Use of Social Accountability Tools and Information Technologies in Monitoring and Evaluation
Author(s)
Sharma, RajivKeywords
CORRUPTCITY GOVERNMENT
USE OF E-GOVERNANCE
GOVERNMENT WORKERS
CONNECTIVITY
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
CAPACITY BUILDING
DECISION MAKING
INFORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
ANTICORRUPTION
CITIZEN SERVICE
CITIZEN ADVISORY
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CIVIL SOCIETY
SERVICE STANDARDS
CITIZENS
STAKEHOLDERS
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR GOVERNMENT
STAKEHOLDER
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
CALL CENTER
RIGHT TO INFORMATION
PUBLIC OPINION
BRIBES
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
PUBLIC POLICY
TARGET GROUPS
CONFIDENCE
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
FRAUD
URBAN GOVERNANCE
TELEPHONES
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
POLITICIANS
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM
STANDARDS OF SERVICE
USES
RELIABILITY
SOCIAL WELFARE
RESULTS
WEB SITES
CERTIFICATE
ONLINE FORMS
FLOW OF INFORMATION
E-PROCUREMENT
SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING
OPEN GOVERNMENT
LICENSES
GOOD GOVERNANCE
WEB SITE
INTERFACE
PROJECT DESIGN
INSPECTION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC SECTOR
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
QUALITY OF SERVICES
LEADERSHIP
PROCUREMENT
LAWS
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM
SOCIAL AUDITS
E-LEARNING
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
QUALITY OF SERVICE
USER
TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNMENT
PRIVATE SCHOOLS
CRIMINAL
WEB
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
DISCUSSION FORUM
COMPLAINTS
TECHNICAL ISSUES
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
PHOTOGRAPHS
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
VIDEO
DISCRETION
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
SMART CARDS
PUBLIC DOMAIN
PARTICIPATORY PERFORMANCE MONITORING
PUBLIC SERVICES
GOVERNMENT TO CITIZEN
E-GOVERNMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CIVIL SERVANTS
DOMAIN
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGEMENT
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
INFORMATION SYSTEM
SERVICE PROVIDERS
ID
FIGURES
GOVERNANCE PROCESSES
SOCIAL AUDIT
BETTER SERVICE DELIVERY
PREPARATION
POSTAL SERVICE
RESULT
CONSULTATIONS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
INDEPENDENT BUDGET ANALYSIS
MATERIAL
SERVICE PROVIDER
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
ASSETS
EGOVERNANCE
PUBLIC INTEREST
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
USERS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ELECTRICITY
BUREAUCRACY
USE OF INFORMATION
DETAILED INFORMATION
MOBILE TELEPHONE
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
USE OF WEB
TELEPHONE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
OPENNESS
SERVICE DELIVERY
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
CORRUPTION
CITIZEN REPORT CARD
CITIZEN
PUBLIC AGENCIES
E-GOVERNANCE
CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS
TRANSPARENCY MECHANISMS
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
KIOSKS
USER FEEDBACK
TRANSPARENCY
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
MOBILE PHONE
CRIMINAL LAW
COMMUNITY SCORECARDS
DIGITAL ASSISTANTS
MINISTER
TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVES
EMBEZZLEMENT
INITIATIVE
ONLINE ACCESS
ICT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11065Abstract
This note attempts to cover the basic concepts relating to the use of social accountability and information technology to monitor and evaluate public services and other governance processes that affect citizens. With the help of simple though practical examples that use these concepts, the note explains how to bring a qualitative change in monitoring and evaluation by making the whole process more citizen centered and outcome oriented. In turn, these practices can help improve the quality of service delivery. The note also covers a few country-specific initiatives from India to support the related arguments.Date
2012-08-13Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/11065http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11065
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Right to InformationTrapnell, Stephanie E.; Trapnell, Stephanie E. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-08-20)This first round of eight case studies was completed in 2012. The case studies were prepared examining the experience of a number of countries that have passed Right to Information (RTI) legislation within the last 15 years: Albania, India, Mexico, Moldova, Peru, Romania, Uganda, and the United Kingdom. Each country case study assesses four dimensions critical to the effective implementation of RTI legislation as follows: 1. The scope of the information that the law covers, which determines whether an RTI law can serve as the instrument of more transparent and accountable governance as envisaged by its advocates. For example, a law that leaves too many categories of information out of its purview, that does not adequately apply to all agencies impacting public welfare or using public resources, or that potentially contradicts with other regulations, like secrecy laws, will not be effective. 2. Issues related to public sector capacity and incentives, additional key functions and demands within the public sector created by RTI, entities responsible for these functions, and various organizational models for fulfilling these functions. 3. Mechanisms for appeals and effective enforcement against the denial of information(whether it be an independent commission or the judiciary); the relative independence, capacity, and scope of powers of the appeals agency, and the ease of the appeals process; and the application of sanctions in the face of unwarranted or mute refusals, providing a credible environment. 4. The capacity of civil society and media groups to apply the law to promote transparency and to monitor the application of the law, and a regulatory and political environment that enables these groups to operate effectively. The in-depth research presented in these case studies was conducted to examine factors that promote the relative effectiveness of these four key dimensions when implementing RTI reforms, including institutional norms, political realities, and economic concerns. An analysis was conducted to determine which models have the potential to work in different contexts and what lessons can be drawn from these experiences to help countries currently in the process of setting up RTI regimes.
-
Citizens and Service Delivery : Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in the Human Development SectorsRingold, Dena; Holla, Alaka; Srinivasan, Santhosh; Koziol, Margaret (World Bank, 2012)Efforts by governments, donors, and civil society alike to improve governance, accountability, and development results on the ground have heightened attention to the idea that citizens can contribute to better public services by holding their policy makers, providers, and program managers accountable. While the use of social accountability to improve services in low- and middle-income countries is not new, the topic has gained currency in recent years. This book looks at how this works in practice. It aims to learn from the experiences gained from the implementation of World Bank projects and from the small, but growing, set of impact evaluations. The review is a first step to identify lessons, knowledge gaps, and questions for further research that can improve the use of these tools in government policies and through programs supported by civil society and donors, including the World Bank. The book documents a diverse and exciting set of cases the rapid adoption of access-to-information laws, the use of public expenditure tracking surveys by civil society organizations to 'follow the money' from central government budgets to schools and health clinics, and the incorporation of grievance redress mechanisms into the design of conditional cash transfer programs. Many of the examples discussed here are new initiatives, and some are being evaluated now. Much will be gained from more evaluation and the sharing of experiences across countries developed and developing alike.
-
Citizens and Service Delivery :
 Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in the
 Human Development SectorsSrinivasan, Santhosh; Koziol, Margaret; Holla, Alaka; Ringold, Dena (World Bank, 2012)Efforts by governments, donors, and
 civil society alike to improve governance, accountability,
 and development results on the ground have heightened
 attention to the idea that citizens can contribute to better
 public services by holding their policy makers, providers,
 and program managers accountable. While the use of social
 accountability to improve services in low- and middle-income
 countries is not new, the topic has gained currency in
 recent years. This book looks at how this works in practice.
 It aims to learn from the experiences gained from the
 implementation of World Bank projects and from the small,
 but growing, set of impact evaluations. The review is a
 first step to identify lessons, knowledge gaps, and
 questions for further research that can improve the use of
 these tools in government policies and through programs
 supported by civil society and donors, including the World
 Bank. The book documents a diverse and exciting set of cases
 the rapid adoption of access-to-information laws, the use of
 public expenditure tracking surveys by civil society
 organizations to 'follow the money' from central
 government budgets to schools and health clinics, and the
 incorporation of grievance redress mechanisms into the
 design of conditional cash transfer programs. Many of the
 examples discussed here are new initiatives, and some are
 being evaluated now. Much will be gained from more
 evaluation and the sharing of experiences across countries
 developed and developing alike.