• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Responsible Leadership Collection
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Responsible Leadership Collection
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Regulatory Governance in Infrastructure Industries: Assessment and Measurement of Brazilian Regulators

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Melo, Marcus
Correa, Paulo
Pereira, Carlos
Mueller, Bernardo
Keywords
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PRIVATE SECTOR INVOLVEMENT
LEGITIMACY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
PRIVATE SECTOR
TARIFF SETTING
REGULATED INDUSTRIES
REGULATORY ACTIVITIES
REGULATORY SYSTEM
STATE REGULATORY
ENERGY POLICY
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
ENERGY SECTOR
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
WATER SECTOR
EFFECTIVE REGULATION
UTILITIES
REGULATORY EFFECTIVENESS
BENCHMARKING
DEREGULATION
REGULATORY ARRANGEMENTS
REGULATORY PRACTICES
INSTITUTIONAL VARIABLES
DECISION-MAKING
BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS
MAJORITY RULE
GOOD REGULATORY GOVERNANCE
RAILROADS
TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES
PRIVATE OPERATORS
REGULATED INDUSTRY
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VESTED INTERESTS
RULES
LEGAL ACTION
LEGISLATION
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
REGULATORY INSTRUMENTS
REGULATORY CREDIBILITY
SANITATION
RAILWAY SYSTEM
STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
TRANSPORT
DISCRETIONARY POWER
INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRIES
INDEPENDENT REGULATORS
CONSUMER SATISFACTION
STATE AGENCY
TRANSACTION COSTS
INDEPENDENT REGULATORY INSTITUTIONS
FEDERAL AGENCIES
REGULATORY DECISIONS
ECONOMIC REGULATION
REGULATORY OUTCOMES
POLITICAL INFLUENCE
LATIN AMERICAN
JUDICIARY
PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY
MUNICIPALITY
FISCAL CRISES
CONSENSUS
REGULATORY CAPTURE
REGULATORY GOVERNANCE
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSITION ECONOMIES
ELECTRICITY SECTOR
STATE AGENCIES
MOBILITY
COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
LEGAL STATUS
GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS
LEGISLATURES
RAILWAY
LEGISLATURE
POLITICIANS
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
RAILWAYS
ENERGY REGULATORS
REGULATORY PROCESS
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
FINANCIAL AUTONOMY
REGULATORS
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
NATURAL GAS
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
PRESIDENTS
REGULATORY AGENCIES
GOOD GOVERNANCE
REGULATORY ACTION
DELEGATION OF POWERS
TECHNICAL STANDARDS
ROADS
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
REGULATORY DECISION
STATE TRANSPORTATION
POOR PERFORMANCE
MULTILATERAL INSTITUTIONS
TRANSPARENCY
DECISION MAKING
ACCOUNTABILITY
PRIVATIZATION
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
REGULATORY AGENCY
INDEPENDENT REGULATORY
DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
POLITICAL STABILITY
INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/90116
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7059
Abstract
The objective of this report is twofold: to provide a comprehensive assessment of the state of regulatory governance in infrastructure industries in Brazil and to suggest possible indicators for future monitoring. After the introduction, Section 2 sets up the analytical framework for the report, identifying key components of regulatory governance, namely, autonomy (political and financial), procedures for decision making, instruments (including personnel), and accountability. Section 3 assesses each of these components in practice, reporting the results of a survey with 21 regulatory agencies in Brazil, which was designed and implemented by the research team in 2005. Section 4 measures regulatory governance based on three related indexes, ranks the Brazilian regulators among themselves, and compares the proposed indexes with two other indicators available in the literature. Section 5 presents the conclusions.
Date
2012-06-04
Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/7059
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7059
978-0-8213-6609-7
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 Unported
Collections
Responsible Leadership Collection

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Regulatory Governance and Sector Performance : Methodology and Evaluation for Electricity Distribution in Latin America

    Andres, Luis; Lopez Azumendi, Sebastián; Guasch, José Luis (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-01)
    This paper contributes to the literature that explores the link between regulatory governance and sector performance. The paper develops an index of regulatory governance and estimates its impact on sector performance, showing that indeed regulation and its governance matter. The authors use two unique databases: (i) the World Bank Performance Database, which contains detailed annual data for 250 private and public electricity companies in Latin America and the Caribbean; and (ii) the Electricity Regulatory Governance Database, which contains data on several aspects of the governance of electricity agencies in the region. The authors run different models to explain the impacts of change in ownership and different characteristics of the regulatory agency on the performance of the utilities. The results suggest that the mere existence of a regulatory agency, regardless of the utilities' ownership, has a significant impact on performance. Furthermore, after controlling for the existence of a regulatory agency, the ownership dummies are still significant and with the expected signs. The authors propose an experience measure in order to identify the gradual impact of the regulatory agency on utility performance. The results confirm this hypothesis. In addition, the paper explores two different measures of governance, an aggregate measure of regulatory governance, and an index based on principal components, including autonomy, transparency, and accountability. The findings show that the governance of regulatory agencies matters and has significant effects on performance.
  • Thumbnail

    Romania - Functional Review : Transport Sector

    World Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-02-07)
    This report describes the results of the Functional Review of the transport sector in Romania. During its early transition years, Romania implemented radical structural reforms in the institutions of the transport sector, but over the last decade there has been concern that these changes have not led to tangible improvements in transport policy administration nor in the efficiency and effectiveness of the main delivery institutions in the railway and road sectors. The Review has tried to discern the main reasons for these shortcomings and to identify remedial actions. It focuses on three main challenges: the administration of the transport sector as a whole; the corporate governance of state-owned road and railway companies; and the priorities for the companies themselves. Attention is also given to budgeting issues and opportunities for greater private sector participation.
  • Thumbnail

    Institutions for Regulatory Governance

    International Finance Corporation; Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency; World Bank (Washington, DC, 2017-08-16)
    This paper looks at the role and design
 of regulatory reform institutions in developing countries.
 These institutions are classified into four broad types: 1)
 regulatory reform units, commonly known in Organization for
 Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries as
 oversight bodies for regulatory reform; 2) high-level
 committees for regulatory reform, established in some
 countries to leverage support and take decisions at a high
 political level; 3) advisory and/or advocacy bodies in
 charge of proposing improvements to the regulatory system by
 strengthening coordination and consultation mechanisms and
 by promoting the regulatory reform agenda; and 4) Ad hoc
 institutions for regulatory reform, established to launch
 regulatory reform efforts and to work on a single defined
 task or activity. This paper is divided into the following
 sections: section one briefly reviews the theoretical debate
 and literature about the role of institutions in
 facilitating higher economic growth, focusing in particular
 on regulatory institutions and their relevance in developing
 countries; section two discusses the main features of
 regulatory reform institutions at the center of government,
 namely regulatory oversight bodies, high level committees,
 advocacy and/ or advisory bodies and ad-hoc institutions for
 regulatory reform; and section three identifies the features
 of these institutions that are considered to be best
 practice. Section three also identifies and discusses
 lessons learned and the implications for establishing and
 operating such institutions in developing country contexts.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.