Author(s)
World BankKeywords
FARM PRODUCTION SYSTEMSPOVERTY INCREASE
AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURAL LAND ACQUISITION
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
PUBLIC SECTOR
LIVING STANDARDS
ECONOMICS
PRIVATE SECTOR
EFFECTIVE USE
PUBLIC ACTIONS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
LOCAL LANGUAGES
CITIZEN FEEDBACK
EMPLOYMENT
TRANSPARENCY
REGIONAL DISPARITIES
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
FINANCIAL SECTOR
COMMODITIES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
FOOD SECURITY
LABOR MARKET
SOCIAL SECTORS
POVERTY RATES
FULL PARTICIPATION
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
PRODUCTIVITY
PUBLIC POLICIES
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
HEALTH SURVEY
MARKET ECONOMY
CIVIL WAR
LAND USE CAPABILITY
FOOD POVERTY LINE
POLICY MAKING
SAFETY NETS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
INCOME
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
SOCIAL INDICATORS
ECONOMIC REFORM
PRIVATE SECTOR
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES
HEALTH STATUS
MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY
GROWTH PATTERN
NATIONAL LEVELS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
MARKET ECONOMY
ETHNIC GROUPS
DECISION MAKING
HEALTH OUTCOMES
LOWLANDS
JOB CREATION PROGRAMS
POLICY MAKERS
DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
POVERTY REDUCTION PROJECTS
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
CRISES
POVERTY REDUCTION
INEQUALITY MEASURES ADMINISTRATIVE BARRIERS
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
GROWTH PRO-POOR
RURAL POVERTY
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
RURAL AREAS
POVERTY MAP
PUBLIC SERVICES
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
INCOME DATA
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
HEALTH SECTOR
PURCHASING POWER
STATISTICAL OFFICE
POVERTY WORK
LOCAL LEVEL
ECONOMIC GROWTH
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
LOCAL LEVELS
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
POVERTY MEASUREMENT
INFORMAL SECTOR
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
EXPENDITURE DATA
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
PRO- POOR
PURCHASING POWER PARITY
URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE
SAFETY NET
ECONOMIC PROGRESS
STATISTICAL DATA
INFANT MORTALITY
SOCIAL SERVICES
VULNERABLE GROUPS
DELIVERY MECHANISMS
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
EMPLOYMENT
DEVELOPMENT REPORT
ETHNIC MINORITIES
CITIZEN
DEVELOPMENT AID
GROWTH RATE
INCREASED INEQUALITY
ENTITLEMENTS
SERVICE DELIVERY
FOOD NEEDS
PUBLIC SPENDING
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR
HEALTH SERVICES
WAGES
AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT
GOVERNANCE OBJECTIVES
POVERTY FOCUS
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
SAVINGS
NUTRITIONAL INTAKE
REDUCING POVERTY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
CONSULTATIVE MANNER
CRONY
POVERTY GAP
ECONOMIC COOPERATION
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
POVERTY RATE
PRO-POOR
DIVERSIFICATION
DEMOCRACY
MASS MIGRATION
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
POPULATION GROUPS
SOCIAL INDICATORS
INFANT MORTALITY
URBANIZATION
POVERTY LINE
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
SOCIAL POLICIES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14651Abstract
Progress in Vietnam has been substantial when other dimensions of poverty, apart from expenditures, are considered. The broader Vietnam Development Goals (VDGs), which are a localized version of the Millennium Development Goals, show a consistent improvement of social indicators, from education enrollment to infant mortality. While some regions and some population groups gained more than others, Vietnam continues to reduce poverty considerably faster than other countries at a similar development level. In the early 1990s, its poverty rate was higher than could be expected, given the country's level of economic development. Some time during the second half of the 1990s Vietnam caught up with the "average" country at its development level, and it largely surpassed it by 2002. The "story" behind the reduction in poverty has somewhat changed over time. Earlier gains had been associated with the distribution of agricultural land to rural households, in a context where economic reform provided the right incentives for increased farm production. But those gains have been mainly reaped by now. In more recent years, the driving forces behind poverty reduction are job creation by the private sector and the increased integration of agriculture in the market economy. A vast majority of the working-age population of Vietnam actually works, and labor market participation rates are among the highest in the world. What has changed is not activity, but rather the composition of employment. Over the last four years, the proportion of people who mainly work on their own farm dropped from almost two thirds to slightly less than half. Instead, many more are now engaged in wage employment: 30 percent of those at work earned a wage in 2002, compared to 19 percent four years earlier. Thanks to its buoyant expansion, by 2002 the formal private sector already accounted for around 2.5 million jobs, more than the entire public sector. But a much larger number of jobs have been created by the private informal sector.Date
2013-07-29Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14651http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14651
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution : Evaluation Techniques and ToolsPereira da Silva, Luiz A.; Bourguignon, Francois; Pereira da Silva, Luiz A.; Bourguignon, Francois (Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press, 2013-08-14)Development is about fundamental change
 in economic structures, about the movement of resources out
 of agriculture to services and industry, about migration to
 cities and international movement of labor, and about
 transformation in trade and technology. Social inclusion and
 change-change in health and life expectancy, in education
 and literacy, in population size and structure, and in
 gender relations-are at the heart of the story. The policy
 challenge is to help release and guide these forces of
 change and inclusion. But how can policymakers assess
 whether what they have done, or what they are doing, is
 right? Since the 1970s public economics has placed the
 serious analysis of growth at the center of its agenda. It
 has shown how to integrate growth and distribution - in
 simple terms, the size of the cake, and the distribution of
 the cake-rigorously into the discussion of public policy,
 both theoretically and empirically.
-
Mali : Poverty and Gender NotesWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-10-02)Mali is one of the poorest countries in the world, with a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of about $ 691 in 2010. Mali's steady per capita GDP growth was accompanied with a significant decline in the poverty rate, from 55.6 percent in 2001 to 43.6 percent in 2009-10. Mali's rapid population growth still has led to an increase of the overall number of people living in poverty, and is constraining progress in terms of per capita health and education outcomes. High fertility rates and gender imbalances are key drivers of Mali's poverty dynamics. The present report compiles three different notes, emphasizing the interrelation between poverty, demographics and gender imbalances. The first note discusses the evolution of poverty in Mali since 2001. The second note reviews recent demographic trends and related policies. The third note reports on the latest available data on females in business and employment within the formal sector. The compilation of these three notes aims to stimulate debates and the exploration of policy options to tackle poverty through its interactions with fertility and gender imbalances. It also highlights conclusion of each note.
-
Republic of Yemen : Poverty Update, Volume 1. Main ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-08-23)Based on the analysis of the household
 budget survey, the report identifies a nationally widespread
 poverty, pervasive in rural areas, concentrated in four
 governorates. The factors that affect the risk of being poor
 in Yemen are lack of education, large households that
 include several children, geographical location that
 prevents access to income generation, and, lack of worker
 remittances from abroad. In addition, while public
 expenditures in social sectors (education and health), are
 mildly pro-poor, they do not address the magnitude of
 rural-urban, and gender gaps, and, by and large, social
 programs are urban biased, mostly benefiting the better-off.
 Incidentally, the benefit-incidence analysis of the safety
 nets, show that coverage is extremely limited, and that
 short-term downturns, and poverty vulnerabilities fail to be
 addressed. Most importantly, the report outlines that
 although programs under the second phase of the Social
 Development Fund are pro-poor, the inter-governorate
 distribution of both the Public Work Programs, and the
 Social Welfare Fund allocations, show no signs of pro-poor
 targeting. It is suggested to pursue structural, and
 institutional reforms, so as to introduce changes in the
 governance structure, that would ensure a pro-poor pattern
 of growth, one that would not widen the gap between the poor
 in urban vs. rural areas. Moreover, public investments in
 the social sectors should be improved, and public
 expenditures for those sectors increased.