Show simple item record

dc.contributorNantana Gaiaseni
dc.contributorChulalongkorn University. Faculty of Political Science
dc.contributor.authorBernadetta Puspita Devi
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T15:01:13Z
dc.date.available2019-09-23T15:01:13Z
dc.date.created2016-02-02 19:51
dc.date.issued2011-09-10
dc.identifieroai:cuir.car.chula.ac.th:123456789/15824
dc.identifierhttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/15824
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/91144
dc.description.abstractThesis (M.A.) -- Chulalongkorn University, 2008
dc.description.abstractThis research examines key governance factors of Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) at the local level, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Measures of governance factors are developed from two approaches to determine the key factors and the perception differences among major parties for ICM sustainability. The first approach is based on a qualitative methodology for two villages: Atep Oki village and Basaan I village. Key governance factors at these two villages were assessed through interaction of social and ecological systems. The second approach combined qualitative and quantitative methods to a group of experts (government officials, NGOs/development workers and scientists). The group of experts provided further explanation of the key governance factors of ICM at the local level and placed values on the degree of importance for each factor. The research findings indicate there are nineteen key governance factors that are important for the sustainability of ICM. However, the status and urgency of the factors are different for each where they have been categorized as ‘reach’, ‘intermediary’ and ‘contradictory’ agreements. Therefore, for the two villages, leadership clearly determines the success of ICM. The role of a key person is vital for transforming ICM from a critical failure to adaptive management. The information obtained from the group of experts illustrated that the degree of importance for key governance factors is markedly different amongst government officials, NGO workers and scientists as well as villagers on the ground level. Differences in valuing key governance factors were influenced by parties’ perceptions of their roles in ICM. This, in turn, affects the way each party views the outcomes of ICM and the outcomes that follow.
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherChulalongkorn University
dc.rightsChulalongkorn University
dc.subjectGood governance -- -- Indonesia
dc.subjectCoastal zone management -- Indonesia -- Sulawesi
dc.subjectIndonesia -- Politics and government
dc.titleKey governance factors of integrated coastal management (ICM) at the local level, North Sulawesi, Indonesia
dc.typeThesis
ge.collectioncodeBL
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:7111449
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/7111449
ge.lastmodificationdate2016-03-21 18:11
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid53
ge.oai.repositoryid1165
ge.oai.setnamePol - Theses
ge.oai.setnameFaculty of Political Science - Pol
ge.oai.setnameFaculty and Institute
ge.oai.setspeccol_123456789_44
ge.oai.setspeccom_123456789_43
ge.oai.setspeccom_123456789_4587
ge.oai.streamid1
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/15824


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record