Responsibility, accountability and ethics : the case for public service leadership
Author(s)
Mafunisa, M.J. (Mutuwafhethu John)Contributor(s)
Kuye, Jerry O.Keywords
Administrative responsibilityConflict of interest
Ethical leadership
Public sector ethics
Accountability
Public service leadership
Public officers -- Professional ethics
Administrative responsibility
Public administration -- Moral and ethical aspects
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/4977Abstract
The existence of bureaucratic power cannot be overstated in the public sector.
 It is also important to note that the irresponsible exercise of that power
 arouses public concern. This article examines the responsibility of public
 servants or those who serve the public through the power they exercise, and
 assesses the ethical standards that they bring to their recommendations and conclusions.
 The article begins by explaining the importance of administrative
 responsibility and examines the interrelated issues of administrative accountability,
 public service ethics, and the public interest. The paper further contends that
 the “responsible” bureaucrat is commonly perceived as one who pursues such
 issues as accountability, integrity, neutrality, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness,
 representativeness, and equity in the procurement of good governance in
 the public domain.Date
2008-04-14Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:UPSpaceProd:2263/4977Kuye, JO & Mafunisa, MJ 2003, 'Responsibility, accountability and ethics: the case for public service leadership', Journal of Public Administration, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 421-437. [http://www.saapam.co.za/]
0036-0767
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/4977
Copyright/License
South African Association for Public Administration and ManagementCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Improving the Quality of Public Expenditure in the Dominican RepublicWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2017-08-14)This book addresses the achievements,
 challenges, and opportunities to improve the quality of
 public spending. Steps to make such changes have come
 through monitoring and evaluation approaches that can be
 replicated or expanded; sectoral efforts to improve the
 performance of priority programs; Congress's use of
 information on the results of public spending; the
 implementation of performance budgeting at subnational
 levels; and the harmonization of accounting between the
 three levels of the federal government. All these aspects
 are key elements of comprehensive reform. Currently, as the
 book states, accountability focuses on achieving results
 rather than on centering attention on mere compliance with
 rules and procedures. In this context, based on a new legal
 framework, the government of Mexico has decisively promoted
 results-based management and budgeting. The Performance
 Evaluation System (SED) was finally established in 2008 with
 the institution of the principles, concepts, methodologies,
 guidelines, procedures, and systems that support its
 operation. Its adoption as a common practice in the Federal
 Public Administration (APF) process will require a gradual,
 progressive, systematic learning and continuous improvement
 that should allow performance evaluation to take root in the
 APF. This calls for consolidating the Results-Based
 Budgeting (RBB)-SED in all agencies, expanding its use and
 improving the quality of the information that feeds it.
 However, not just the APF benefit will from the
 implementation of the RBB-SED. As the publication suggests,
 the approach to an expenditure budget based on performance
 information offers Congress great opportunities to enhance
 its regulatory and supervisory functions. The improvement in
 the quality of Matrices de Indicadores para Resultados
 (MIRs), program evaluations, and their integration into the
 budgetary programming cycle also contributes to this purpose.
-
Democratic Republic of Congo Reforming the Public Service Wage System : Background PaperWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-09)The civil service management model in
 the Demorcatic Republic of Congo (DRC) still conforms to the
 old institutional order. The legislation governing
 employment in the public sector is unchanged and still
 responds to centralized administration. The public
 administration categorizes public employees in two main
 groups: civil servants and local public employees. Civil
 servants are governed by legislation that is neither merit
 based nor performance and result oriented. Local public
 employees are governed by labor legislation.
 Decentralization also requires the definition of a salary
 system for the new provincial administrations. For the first
 six months of the establishment of the provincial Civil
 Service, the same salary paid to the State civil servants
 should be ensured and paid to the provincial civil servants
 by the State administration. The provinces would not have
 yet established adequate financial coverage and mechanisms
 to ensure regular payments. While the provincial
 administrations are being consolidated (maximum 2 years),
 new legislation for public sub national service should be
 established including norms on wages. Such legislation
 should be in line with the national civil service
 legislation regarding principles and standards. The DRC
 Government is faced with five main challenges: 1) To
 modernize the Civil Service system and amend its legislation
 to elevate it to improved standards of efficiency in service
 delivery and human resources management. These can be
 achieved by instilling values including merit, results,
 performance, and professionalization. 2) To fill the
 normative vacuum by setting rules and procedures to manage
 the new decentralized Civil Service. 3) To establish
 interactive consultation tools and procedures among all
 levels of public administration. 4) To harmonize the
 national and sub-national Civil Services with the new
 constitutional order. 5) To make the public administration a
 more attractive employer for young skilled professionals by
 reforming and improving the public sector wage system
 through systematic and sound reform measures.
-
Congo, Democratic Republic of - Reforming the Public Service Wage System : Background PaperWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-09)The civil service management model in the Demorcatic Republic of Congo (DRC) still conforms to the old institutional order. The legislation governing employment in the public sector is unchanged and still responds to centralized administration. The public administration categorizes public employees in two main groups: civil servants and local public employees. Civil servants are governed by legislation that is neither merit based nor performance and result oriented. Local public employees are governed by labor legislation. Decentralization also requires the definition of a salary system for the new provincial administrations. For the first six months of the establishment of the provincial Civil Service, the same salary paid to the State civil servants should be ensured and paid to the provincial civil servants by the State administration. The provinces would not have yet established adequate financial coverage and mechanisms to ensure regular payments. While the provincial administrations are being consolidated (maximum 2 years), new legislation for public sub national service should be established including norms on wages. Such legislation should be in line with the national civil service legislation regarding principles and standards. The DRC Government is faced with five main challenges: 1) To modernize the Civil Service system and amend its legislation to elevate it to improved standards of efficiency in service delivery and human resources management. These can be achieved by instilling values including merit, results, performance, and professionalization. 2) To fill the normative vacuum by setting rules and procedures to manage the new decentralized Civil Service. 3) To establish interactive consultation tools and procedures among all levels of public administration. 4) To harmonize the national and sub-national Civil Services with the new constitutional order. 5) To make the public administration a more attractive employer for young skilled professionals by reforming and improving the public sector wage system through systematic and sound reform measures.