Factors contributing to the success of benchmarking : a South African perspective
Keywords
Partnership benchmarkingManufacturing companies
Cost-benefit analysis
Consortium benchmarking
Code of conduct
Benchmarking
Benchmarking projects
Benchmarking partners
Accounting
Manufacturing
Economics
Benchmarking (Management) -- South Africa
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/11224Abstract
This study aims to identify the factors that have an influence on the success of benchmarking projects, and finds that listed South Aftican manufacturing companies achieve a high degree of success with their benchmarking projects. The key success factors are a cost-benefit analysis and the formulation of an implementation plan during the planning stage of the process. Other factors include limitation of the scope and length of the project, an optimum number of four partners, the selection of partners of similar size and the inclusion of partners from other industries. It was also found that the compliance with a code of conduct by all the partners and the consideration of ethical and legal aspects
 are essential elements of success.Date
2009-09-11Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:UPSpaceProd:2263/11224Human, JS & Shotter, M 2001, 'Factors contributing to the success of benchmarking: a South African perspective', South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26-40. [http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_ecoman.html]
1015-8812
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/11224
Copyright/License
Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of PretoriaCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
International Asset Allocations and Capital Flows : The Benchmark EffectRaddatz, Claudio; Schmukler, Sergio L.; Williams, Tomas (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-05-14)This paper studies channels through
 which well-known benchmark indexes impact asset allocations
 and capital flows across countries. The study uses unique
 monthly micro-level data of benchmark compositions and
 mutual fund investments during 1996-2012. Benchmarks have
 important effects on equity and bond mutual fund portfolios
 across funds with different degrees of activism. Benchmarks
 explain, on average, around 70 percent of country
 allocations and have significant impact even on active
 funds. Benchmark effects are important after controlling for
 industry, macroeconomic, and country-specific, time-varying
 effects. Reverse causality does not drive the results.
 Exogenous, pre-announced changes in benchmarks result in
 movements in asset allocations mostly when these changes are
 implemented (not when announced). By impacting country
 allocations, benchmarks affect capital flows across
 countries through direct and indirect channels, including
 contagion. They explain apparently counterintuitive
 movements in capital flows, generating outflows from
 countries when upgraded and with large market capitalization
 and better relative performance.
-
Factors contributing to the success of benchmarking : a South African perspectiveHuman, J.S.; Shotter, Magdalena (Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, 2009-09-11)This study aims to identify the factors that have an influence on the success of benchmarking projects, and finds that listed South Aftican manufacturing companies achieve a high degree of success with their benchmarking projects. The key success factors are a cost-benefit analysis and the formulation of an implementation plan during the planning stage of the process. Other factors include limitation of the scope and length of the project, an optimum number of four partners, the selection of partners of similar size and the inclusion of partners from other industries. It was also found that the compliance with a code of conduct by all the partners and the consideration of ethical and legal aspects are essential elements of success.
-
Deconstructing Herding : Evidence from Pension Fund Investment BehaviorRaddatz, Claudio; Schmukler, Sergio L. (2012-03-19)Pension funds have been expected to
 invest in a wide range of securities and provide liquidity
 to domestic capital markets since they are the most
 sophisticated investors, with plenty of resources to gather
 private information and manage portfolios professionally.
 However, by analyzing unique, monthly asset-level data from
 the pioneer case of Chile, this paper shows that pension
 funds tend to herd. This is consistent with pension funds
 copying each other in their investment strategies as a way
 to extract information, boost returns, and reduce risk. The
 authors compute measures of herding across asset classes
 (equities, government bonds, and private sector bonds) and
 at different pension fund industry levels. The results show
 that pension funds herd more in assets for which they have
 less market information and when risk increases. Moreover,
 herding is more prevalent across funds that narrowly compete
 with each other, that is, when comparing funds of the same
 type across pension fund administrators. There is much less
 herding within pension fund administrators and across
 pension fund administrators as a whole. This herding pattern
 is consistent with incentives for managers to be close to
 industry benchmarks, which might be driven by both market
 forces and regulation.