Show simple item record

dc.contributorMahoney, Joseph T
dc.contributorSomaya, Deepak
dc.contributorLeblebici, Huseyin
dc.contributorChatain, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorMawdsley, John Kenneth
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-24T08:39:00Z
dc.date.available2019-10-24T08:39:00Z
dc.date.created2017-02-28 00:10
dc.date.issued2015-09-29
dc.identifieroai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87961
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/2142/87961
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/915333
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the implications on the performance and business scope of knowledge-based service firms (???suppliers???) that build deeply embedded exchange relationships with their clients. Prior research in the relational view has revealed the potential for firms to gain advantages (but also to become exposed to hazards) through close inter-organizational relationships characterized by greater levels of relationship-specific investments (or ???relational commitments???). However, theory development and empirical examinations in the relational view have largely been at the level of the dyad. Thus, the firm-level impacts from deeper commitments across a firm???s portfolio of relationships, and whether firms can generate competitive advantages from being a more relational partner, are less understood. In my first empirical study (chapter two), I extend the relational view by examining the firm-level growth performance impacts of supplier firms choosing a more embedded relational strategy across their portfolio of client relationships. I find that suppliers who receive greater relational commitments from their existing clients can gain advantages for growing their business, but unilateral commitments by suppliers may not provide similar advantages. Rather, unilateral supplier commitments may be hazardous for supplier growth performance. Furthermore, consistent with the joint value-maximizing perspective of the relational view, I find bilateral, or mutual, relational commitments by suppliers and clients provide the greatest opportunity for supplier growth. By contrast, strong relational commitments constrain a supplier from taking advantage of more broad-based demand growth within the business domains in which that supplier operates, thereby negatively impacting supplier growth performance. In my second empirical study (chapter three), I extend the relational view -- and connect corporate strategy with business strategy -- by providing a novel, relational theory of corporate diversification. I show that the advantages suppliers gain in sourcing new business from existing clients lead those suppliers to expand their business scope in response to diversification by their clients. Furthermore, I reveal that this ???client-led diversification??? effect is strengthened by suppliers??? client-specific knowledge and clients??? relational commitment to suppliers, and when suppliers hold greater excess resource capacity. My third empirical study (chapter four), also connects the relational view and corporate strategy literatures by investigating how a broader portfolio of businesses impacts supplier survival, and how a supplier???s client management strategy moderates this scope-survival relationship. I find that suppliers gain survival advantages through a more diversified portfolio of client services, and these supplier scope-survival advantages are enhanced when suppliers dedicate a greater fraction of their business to serving long-term clients. In addition, a supplier???s scope-survival advantage is also increased when their clients have a greater presence in fast-paced, innovative markets, relative to the markets within the supplier???s own business portfolio. I test my dissertation predictions using detailed longitudinal panel data on legal patent prosecution work outsourced by corporate clients to patent law firms. The findings provide nuanced insights into the value of relationship-specific investments for firm performance and business scope, and test the limits to which deeply embedded relationships provide firm-level advantages.
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCopyright 2015 John Kenneth Mawdsley
dc.subjectrelational view
dc.subjectbuyer-supplier relationships
dc.subjectfirm performance
dc.subjectdiversification
dc.subjectrelational assets
dc.subjectprofessional service firms
dc.titleRelational strategy, business scope, and firm performance: evidence from supplier-client relationships in knowledge-based services
dc.typeThesis
ge.collectioncodeOAIDATA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:10528060
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gtl/10528060
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-02-28 00:10
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149000
ge.oai.repositoryid4412
ge.oai.setnameDept. of Business Administration
ge.oai.setnameCollege of Business
ge.oai.setnameGraduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois
ge.oai.setnameDissertations and Theses - Business Administration
ge.oai.setnameGraduate Dissertations and Theses at Illinois
ge.oai.setspeccom_2142_14790
ge.oai.setspeccom_2142_9216
ge.oai.setspeccom_2142_5130
ge.oai.setspeccol_2142_14791
ge.oai.setspeccol_2142_5131
ge.oai.streamid5
ge.setnameGlobeTheoLib
ge.setspecglobetheolib
ge.linkhttp://hdl.handle.net/2142/87961


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record