Agriculturally Related Environmental Issues in Free Trade Agreements
Author(s)
Colyer, DaleKeywords
trade and environmentagricultural trade
trade liberalization
Doha Round
Environmental Economics and Policy
International Relations/Trade
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemOnline Access
http://purl.umn.edu/25756Abstract
The consideration of environmental matters in trade liberalization agreements has become an issue since they were included in NAFTA and recognized Uruguay round agreement that created the WTO. Many WTO members, especially the less developed countries, remain opposed to including environmental issues in trade agreements. However, Canada, the U.S. and a few other countries now include environmental provisions in their bilateral and regional trade agreements; the U.S. is required to do so under its 2002 Trade Promotion Act (PL 107-210). Furthermore, the declaration establishing the Doha Round of multilateral negotiations recognizes a role, albeit a limited one, for the environment in negotiating the next multilateral trade liberalization agreement. Negotiations on these issues have been intense with relatively little agreed on to date.Date
2006-06-07Type
Conference Paper or PresentationIdentifier
oai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:2575622108
http://purl.umn.edu/25756
Colecciones
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
Regional Trade AgreementsFreund, Caroline; Ornelas, Emanuel (2012-03-19)This paper reviews the theoretical and
 empirical literature on regionalism. The formation of
 regional trade agreements has been, by far, the most popular
 form of reciprocal trade liberalization in the past 15
 years. The discriminatory character of these agreements has
 raised three main concerns: that trade diversion would be
 rampant, because special interest groups would induce
 governments to form the most distortionary agreements; that
 broader external trade liberalization would stall or
 reverse; and that multilateralism could be undermined.
 Theoretically, all of these concerns are legitimate,
 although there are also several theoretical arguments that
 oppose them. Empirically, neither widespread trade diversion
 nor stalled external liberalization has materialized, while
 the undermining of multilateralism has not been properly
 tested. There are also several aspects of regionalism that
 have received too little attention from researchers, but
 which are central to understanding its causes and consequences.
-
Integration of Markets vs. Integration by AgreementsAminian, Nathalie; Fung, K.C.; Ng, Francis (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-03)This paper provides an analysis of the
 two channels of regional integration: integration via
 markets and integration via agreements. Given that East Asia
 and Latin America are two fertile regions where both forms
 of integrations have taken place, the authors examine the
 experiences of these two areas. There are four related
 results. First, East Asia had been integrating via markets
 long before formal agreements were in vogue in the region.
 Latin America, by contrast, has primarily used formal
 regional trade treaties as the main channel of integration.
 Second, despite the relative lack of formal regional trade
 treaties until recently, East Asia is more integrated among
 itself than Latin America. Third, from a purely economic and
 trade standpoint, the proper sequence of integrations seems
 to be first integrating via markets and subsequently via
 formal regional trade agreements. Fourth, regional trade
 agreements often serve multiple constituents. The reason why
 integrating via markets first can be helpful is because this
 can give stronger political bargaining power to the
 outward-looking economic-oriented forces within the country.
-
A Preliminary Analysis of the Impact of a Ukraine-EU Free Trade Agreement on Agriculturevon Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan; Hess, Sebastian; Brummer, Bernhard (2010-04-01)Agriculture including food products is
 of particular interest for Ukraine. However, in free trade
 agreements involving the European Union, agriculture is
 always given special treatment and subject to less and
 slower liberalization than other sectors. This paper employs
 the standard Global Trade Analysis Project model in order to
 assess how World Trade Organization accession affects
 agriculture in Ukraine, and how potential bilateral tariff
 cuts may interact with potential productivity gains within
 Ukrainian agriculture. The results indicate that, due to
 trade liberalization, Ukraine can expect gains from a more
 efficient allocation of its resources in line with
 comparative advantage, leading to an increase of production
 and exports of wheat, other grains, and oilseeds, but also
 of several processed food products that benefit from less
 expensive intermediate inputs. However, Ukraine's
 exports are concentrated on a small number of destinations,
 especially Russia and some other Former Soviet Union
 countries because they fail to meet quality standards
 elsewhere. When Ukrainian production of these products
 increases due to increased allocative efficiency, exports to
 Russia increase further and prices there fall, generating
 negative terms of trade effects that largely offset the
 allocative gains. Ukrainian imports of agricultural products
 increase as well, partly because Ukrainian consumers switch
 to higher quality imported goods even though domestic
 production increases. Regarding free trade agreement
 negotiations with the European Union, these results
 highlight for Ukraine the fact that improved agricultural
 productivity will help to get most out of improved market
 access. However, the results also highlight for Ukraine the
 great importance of adopting internationally accepted
 quality standards in order to diversify its export structure.