Africa's adjustment to transnational capital : the political economy of the African Union and the New Partnership for Africa's Development.

Abstract

This dissertation situates Africa’s macro-restructuring through the AU-NEPAD in the
 context of a disciplined post-colonial Africa. It challenges the claims of the AU-NEPAD
 as being reflective of the aspirations of Africa’s people and the appropriate African
 solution to Africa’s structural challenges. This study argues that the ostensible counterhegemonic
 discourse of AU-NEPAD vis-à-vis global capitalism merely expresses a new
 politics of reformism that ensures Africa integrates its national circuits of accumulation
 into global capitalism on the terms of transnational capital. Africa’s adjustment to
 transnational capital through the AU-NEPAD is not the same as national debt based
 conditionality adjustment. Instead, AU-NEPAD macro-restructuring is treated as a multidimensional
 class project to ensure a new African order is constituted in which Africa’s
 states and societies are further subordinated to the non-hegemonic rule of transnational
 capital. AU-NEPAD macro-restructuring is central to facilitating Africa’s continental
 passive revolution and creating the conditions for a new scramble for Africa’s natural
 resources, markets and states.
 This study explains the role of AU-NEPAD macro-restructuring as a class project of the
 transnational fraction of Africa’s ruling classes in three ways. First, it highlights how the
 shifting relations of force of a disciplined Africa spawned a conjuncture in which
 nationally based transnational class formation and structural change created the
 conditions for a continental project of Afro-neoliberal macro-restructuring. This study
 historicises the underpinnings of this project. It shows how a class consensus emerged
 around new concepts of control for the macro-restructuring of Africa. Such new concepts
 of ‘security and stability’, ‘liberal democracy’, ‘globalisation’ and ‘partnership’ cemented
 the basis for a common Afro-neoliberal consensus within the transnational fraction of
 Africa’s ruling classes. This consensus expressed itself concretely through the AUNEPAD
 and indigenised transnational neoliberalism as Afro-neoliberalism at the
 continental level.
 iv
 Second, this study goes inside the AU-NEPAD project to understand how Afroneoliberalism
 works at the level of macro-restructuring as distinct from national
 structural adjustment to transnational capital. It shows how macro-restructuring is a form
 of adjustment but grounded in situated class practices at a continental level. Such class
 practices are materially grounded and express the structural and direct power of the
 transnational fraction of Africa’s ruling class to advance AU-NEPAD macrorestructuring.
 Concepts, principles, discourses, policy frameworks and various tactics are
 expressions of these class practices. In this study the AU-NEPAD is based on five key
 strategic thrusts which inform class practices inside AU-NEPAD macro-restructuring: (i)
 the discourse of the African Renaissance and Afro-neoliberal capitalism through which
 pan-Africanism is appropriated; (ii) the imposition and construction of partnership on the
 continent; (iii) using peace and stability interventions not just to end conflict but to
 implant Afro-neoliberal societies and assimilate illiberal Africa; (iv) excluding and
 coopting mass forces and (v) fostering ‘partnership’ with the US-led transnational
 historical bloc.
 Finally, this study explains AU-NEPAD macro-restructuring as a class project by
 bringing into view how Afro-neoliberalism as an instrument of class rule is further
 defined at the intersection with and through responses from key multi-lateral and private
 transnational institutions within the US-led transnational historical bloc. This study
 shows how the UN, the IMF and World Bank, the G8 and the World Economic Forum
 embrace AU-NEPAD macro-restructuring and globalise a consensus about what Africa
 means and what its development challenges and solutions are. In this process of
 hegemonic engagement Africa is integrated into global capitalism through a new balance
 between consent and coercion and the politico-ideological integration of the Afroneoliberal
 historic bloc into the US-led transnational historical bloc on the terms of
 transnational capital.