Russian Federation : National and Regional Trends in Regulatory Burden and Corruption
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
REGULATORY BURDENCOMPETITORS
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAWS
COMMODITY PRODUCERS
PRIVATE SECTORS
RESOURCE-RICH REGIONS
REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
ACCOUNTABILITY
REGIONAL VARIATION
REGIONAL DUMMY
DATA ANALYSIS
PRODUCTIVITY
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
BUSINESS OPERATIONS
ANTI-CORRUPTION
REGIONAL CIVIL SERVANTS
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
SEARCH
POLITICIANS
WEB SITES
PUBLIC OFFICIAL
REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
USERS
FIRMS
INITIATIVE
LAND LABOR
KICKBACK
REGIONAL TRENDS
GRAFT
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
REGIONAL PROCUREMENT
ANTICORRUPTION
MANUFACTURING
CRONY
TRANSACTION
POORER REGIONS
ENTREPRENEURS
REGIONAL BUSINESS
MEDIA
REGIONAL LEVELS
ASSETS
USES
LICENSES
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
CIVIL SERVANT
COMMODITY
PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS
BRIBES
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
ELECTRICITY
BUSINESS OPERATION
REGIONAL LEVEL
REGIONAL POLICIES
RELIABILITY
CORRUPT
REGIONAL PATTERNS
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
RICH REGIONS
REGIONAL AVERAGE
CIVIL SOCIETY
NATURAL RESOURCES
FINANCIAL BENEFIT
POVERTY REDUCTION
RESULTS
LICENSE
REGIONAL PRODUCT
PUBLIC FUNDS
BANKS
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
PRIVATE SECTOR
GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION
PRIVATE GAINS
ENTERPRISE SURVEYS
REGIONAL PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS CLIMATE
TRANSPARENCY
CONFIDENCE
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
BUSINESSES
CUSTOMS
CORRUPTION
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
LAGGING REGIONS
INSPECTIONS
WEB
BRIBERY
LICENSING
EQUIPMENT
PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS
FOREIGN OWNERSHIP
INSPECTION
PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX
COMPLAINTS
REDUCTION IN TIME
ACCOUNTING
FIRM SIZE
GOVERNMENT DECREES
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
BRIBE
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP
GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL
REGIONAL POPULATION
PROCUREMENTS
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
GOVERNMENT CONTRACT
REGULATORY REFORM
LAWS
RESULT
NATURAL RESOURCE
CIVIL SERVANTS
FOREIGN TRADE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16566Abstract
Using data from business environment and
 enterprise performance survey (BEEPS) and other enterprise
 surveys, studies have shown that firm entry, growth and
 productivity are impeded by corruption and overly burdensome
 regulation. Most of these studies have been based on
 cross-country data (e.g. Barseghyan, 2008), or
 country-specific studies of firms in China (e.g. Cai et al.,
 2011; Cull and Xu, 2005), Mexico (Bruhn, 2011) and other
 nations. Other studies, however, are specific to Russia
 (e.g. Yakovlev and Zhuravskaya, 2007). Cross-regional
 variation in corruption and regulatory burden in Russia are
 potentially important factors in explaining differential
 performance in private sector development, income levels and
 growth rates. The intended audiences of this note are
 policymakers and policy analysts in the non-governmental
 organization (NGO) and academic communities who are
 interested in regulatory reform, corruption, and related
 aspects of the business environment in Russia. A broad range
 of evidence shows that overly burdensome regulation and
 corruption are significant impediments to firm entry,
 productivity and growth. Cross-regional variation in
 corruption and regulatory burden in Russia is a potentially
 important factor in explaining differential performance in
 private sector development, income levels and growth rates.
 Moreover, further research can investigate the extent to
 which distortions in various regulatory and administrative
 areas and transactions may be redundant, in their effects on
 firm entry and growth. Reforms in a limited number of areas
 may show disappointing results, if there are remaining
 distortions sufficient to deter entry or expansion.
 Rent-seekers may be able to substitute one regulatory
 barrier for another in blocking competitors.Date
2014-01-10Type
Publications & Research :: Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16566http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16566
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Russian Federation - National and Regional Trends in Regulatory Burden and Corruption : Policy Note - Russian Federation : National and Regional Trends in Regulatory Burden and CorruptionWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-01-10)Using data from business environment and enterprise performance survey (BEEPS) and other enterprise surveys, studies have shown that firm entry, growth and productivity are impeded by corruption and overly burdensome regulation. Most of these studies have been based on cross-country data (e.g. Barseghyan, 2008), or country-specific studies of firms in China (e.g. Cai et al., 2011; Cull and Xu, 2005), Mexico (Bruhn, 2011) and other nations. Other studies, however, are specific to Russia (e.g. Yakovlev and Zhuravskaya, 2007). Cross-regional variation in corruption and regulatory burden in Russia are potentially important factors in explaining differential performance in private sector development, income levels and growth rates. The intended audiences of this note are policymakers and policy analysts in the non-governmental organization (NGO) and academic communities who are interested in regulatory reform, corruption, and related aspects of the business environment in Russia. A broad range of evidence shows that overly burdensome regulation and corruption are significant impediments to firm entry, productivity and growth. Cross-regional variation in corruption and regulatory burden in Russia is a potentially important factor in explaining differential performance in private sector development, income levels and growth rates. Moreover, further research can investigate the extent to which distortions in various regulatory and administrative areas and transactions may be redundant, in their effects on firm entry and growth. Reforms in a limited number of areas may show disappointing results, if there are remaining distortions sufficient to deter entry or expansion. Rent-seekers may be able to substitute one regulatory barrier for another in blocking competitors.
-
Institutions for Regulatory GovernanceInternational Finance Corporation; Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency; World Bank (Washington, DC, 2017-08-16)This paper looks at the role and design
 of regulatory reform institutions in developing countries.
 These institutions are classified into four broad types: 1)
 regulatory reform units, commonly known in Organization for
 Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries as
 oversight bodies for regulatory reform; 2) high-level
 committees for regulatory reform, established in some
 countries to leverage support and take decisions at a high
 political level; 3) advisory and/or advocacy bodies in
 charge of proposing improvements to the regulatory system by
 strengthening coordination and consultation mechanisms and
 by promoting the regulatory reform agenda; and 4) Ad hoc
 institutions for regulatory reform, established to launch
 regulatory reform efforts and to work on a single defined
 task or activity. This paper is divided into the following
 sections: section one briefly reviews the theoretical debate
 and literature about the role of institutions in
 facilitating higher economic growth, focusing in particular
 on regulatory institutions and their relevance in developing
 countries; section two discusses the main features of
 regulatory reform institutions at the center of government,
 namely regulatory oversight bodies, high level committees,
 advocacy and/ or advisory bodies and ad-hoc institutions for
 regulatory reform; and section three identifies the features
 of these institutions that are considered to be best
 practice. Section three also identifies and discusses
 lessons learned and the implications for establishing and
 operating such institutions in developing country contexts.
-
Regulatory Capacity Review of TanzaniaInternational Finance Corporation; Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency; World Bank (Washington, DC, 2010)Regulatory reform has emerged as an
 important policy area in developing countries. For reforms
 to be beneficial, regulatory regimes need to be transparent,
 coherent, and comprehensive. They must establish appropriate
 institutional frameworks and liberalized business
 regulations; enforce competition policy and law; and open
 external and internal markets to trade and investment. This
 report analyses the institutional set-up and use of
 regulatory policy instruments in Tanzania. It is one of five
 reports prepared on countries in East and Southern Africa
 (the others are on Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and Zambia), and
 represents an attempt to apply assessment tools and the
 framework developed by the Organization for Economic
 Cooperation and Development (OECD) in its work on regulatory
 capacity and performance to developing countries.