Political Capture of Decentralization : Vote-Buying through Grants-Financed Local Jurisdictions
Author(s)
Khemani, StutiKeywords
POLITICAL PARTYCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
GERRYMANDERING
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
MAYORS
UTILITIES
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
CONSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
NATIONAL PARLIAMENT
TAX REVENUE
VILLAGE GOVERNMENTS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CITIZENS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
FISCAL FEDERALISM
DECENTRALIZATION REFORMS
DEMOCRATIZATION
LOCAL EXPENDITURES
SUBNATIONAL
POLITICIANS
AUDITS
PUBLIC ECONOMICS
HEALTH SERVICES
POLICY CHOICES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
TAX
TAX EVASION
PROVINCES
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
DISCLOSURE
LOCAL SPENDING
PUBLIC
PUBLIC AGENCIES
FEDERATIONS
COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
ELECTRICITY
SOCIAL NETWORKS
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
AUTHORITY
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
LOCAL REVENUE
PUBLIC SPENDING PROGRAMS
DEMOCRACY
PARLIAMENT
DECISION-MAKING
LEGISLATOR
CIVIL SOCIETY
SUFFRAGE
DECREE
ELECTION
EQUALIZATION
LEGISLATIVE DECISION
LEVEL OF TAXATION
POLICY OBJECTIVES
POLITICAL PARTIES
POLICY STUDIES
REVENUE ASSIGNMENTS
GOVERNMENT POLICY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
REVOLUTION
DISTRICT
TAX REVENUES
LOCAL ELECTIONS
CONGRESSMAN
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY
SOCIAL CAPITAL
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
FISCAL POLICIES
POLITICAL MOBILIZATION
PUBLIC POLICIES
VILLAGE
MUNICIPALITIES
ECONOMIC ELITES
CASH ASSISTANCE
FISCAL EQUALIZATION
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
CITIES
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
NATIONALS
TAX SYSTEM
BENEFIT INCIDENCE
TAX COLLECTION
MUNICIPAL REVENUES
PROVINCE
LEGISLATURES
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
CONSTITUENTS
PANCHAYATS
PUBLIC GOOD
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
ANTI-CORRUPTION
DEMOCRACIES
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
TAX DECENTRALIZATION
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
CONSTITUENCIES
DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
POLITICAL COMPETITION
ECONOMIC SHOCKS
PUBLIC INTEREST
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
PROVINCIAL GOVERNORS
PUBLIC SERVICE
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
FISCAL CAPACITY
PRIVATE GOODS
DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
EMPLOYMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
DEVOLUTION
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE OF GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
REVENUE-RAISING POTENTIAL
TAX BASES
POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION
COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
WAGES
TOWNS
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
POLICY ISSUES
GAMBLING
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
EXPENDITURE
AUDITING
REVENUE-RAISING POWER
PUBLIC FUNDS
LOCAL AUTONOMY
PUBLIC POLICY
MUNICIPALITY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES
PUBLIC ACTION
LEGISLATORS
VILLAGES
PUBLIC AGENCY
FISCAL POLICY
TAX RATE
CASH TRANSFERS
GOVERNMENT STRATEGY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
STATE GOVERNMENTS
ROADS
SOCIAL COST
DISTRICTS
LOCAL PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
AFFILIATES
SUBNATIONAL FINANCE
CONSTITUENCY
PUBLIC FINANCE
POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM
LOCAL BODIES
ELECTORAL POLITICS
VOTING
CONSTITUTION
BUDGET CONSTRAINT
TAX RATES
LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
STATE GOVERNMENT
REDISTRIBUTION
NET TAX BURDEN
PUBLIC SPENDING
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
USER CHARGES
FISCAL CENTRALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3835Abstract
A recent trend in decentralization in
 several large and diverse countries is the creation of local
 jurisdictions below the regional level -- municipalities,
 towns, and villages -- whose spending is almost exclusively
 financed by grants from both regional and national
 governments. This paper argues that such grants-financed
 decentralization enables politicians to target benefits to
 pivotal voters and organized interest groups in exchange for
 political support. Decentralization, in this model, is
 subject to political capture, facilitating vote-buying,
 patronage, or pork-barrel projects, at the expense of
 effective provision of broad public goods. There is
 anecdotal evidence on local politics in several large
 countries that is consistent with this theory. The paper
 explores its implications for international development
 programs in support of decentralization.Date
2010-06-01Type
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/3835http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3835
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kyrgyz Republic Public Expenditure Review Policy Notes : Intergovernmental Fiscal RelationsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-08-14)Intergovernmental fiscal relations have
 advanced over the last decade in the Kyrgyz Republic. Since
 the previous public expenditure review in 2004, the
 government of the Kyrgyz Republic has developed a number of
 policy changes in the area of intergovernmental fiscal
 relations. These policy changes helped the country to
 introduce a more transparent and equitable system of local
 government financing. Still, effective decentralization
 continues to face challenges. A set of policy
 recommendations for the government to consider are designed
 to clarify the role of local government and provide better
 incentives for improved service delivery. These are based on
 a review of the four pillars of intergovernmental fiscal
 relations in Kyrgyz Republic: (i) the expenditure assignment
 (of who does what); (ii) revenue assignment (with what
 resources) assignment; (iii) the system of transfers; and
 (iv) borrowing. In this context, the report is structured as
 follows: section one gives executive summary. Section two
 provides a brief description of the institutional context in
 terms of the structure of government and the elements of
 political and administrative decentralization. Section three
 analyzes the delineation of expenditure responsibilities
 among government tiers. Section four analyzes revenue
 sources assigned to each tier of government. Section five
 focuses on the system of intergovernmental transfers.
 Section six examines subnational public investments and
 borrowing. In each of these sections main issues and
 problems are identified in the current system and the
 desired directions for reform are pointed out.
-
Decentralization and Local Governance in MENA : A Survey of Policies, Institutions, and PracticesWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-21)Entering the 21st century, the 1999-2000 World Development Report (WDR), identifies two main forces that are shaping the world in which development policy is being defined and implemented: (i) globalization, the increasing worldwide integration of private sector interaction and commercial relationships; and (ii) localization, a process of devolving fiscal and administrative roles and responsibilities from central to sub-national tiers of government. It goes on to note that these global-private and local-public pressures are not only reinforcing, but also challenging traditional paradigms and forms of intergovernmental systems. Political decentralization, often associated with pluralistic politics and representative government, aims to give citizens more say in public policy and decision-making. Its advocates assume that decisions made with greater participation will be better informed and more relevant to diverse interests in society than those made only by national political authorities. The concept implies that the selection of representatives from local electoral jurisdictions allows citizens to know better their political representatives and allows elected officials to know better the needs and desires of their constituents. Administrative decentralization aims to redistribute authority, responsibility and financial resources for providing public services among different levels of government. It typically takes three forms: de-concentration, delegation and devolution. Fiscal decentralization vests greater autonomy and authority with local governments in matters of fiscal importance, empowering local governments to generate their own revenues, through taxes and user charges, as well as determining their expenditure priorities based on a clear assignment of functions and responsibilities. Over the last two decades, it has been estimated that more than 100 countries, most of them in the developing world, have experimented with various forms of decentralization.
-
South East Europe Municipal Finance Review : Local Government Finance in the Western BalkansWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-07-22)This report addresses the limited access
 to local governments of data and knowledge of municipal
 finance issues in South East Europe (SEE). The objective of
 the analytical work under the SEE Municipal Finance Review
 (MFR) aims to (i) contribute to improved understanding of
 local government management and finance in the SEE Region;
 and (ii) contribute to improving the quality and consistency
 of key municipal finance data for improved evidence based
 policy making. The analysis presented in this report
 comprises the first attempt to review and analyze a regional
 set of disaggregated sub-national finance data in the SEE
 Region. Main findings of the MFR are presented in this
 report. Following an introductory chapter, chapter 2
 provides an overview of the decentralization framework in
 the SEE Region, including on the administrative and
 political structure of sub-national governments, their
 population size and distribution, and the service functions
 assigned to local governments. Chapter 3 explains in more
 detail the local government finance framework. This includes
 an overview of the structure and composition of sub-national
 finances, in particular (i) revenue and expenditure
 assignments; (ii) transfers and intergovernmental fiscal
 relations; and (iii) the evolving framework and realities of
 sub-national borrowing and debt. Chapter 4 provides a
 summary of the key trends and findings from the
 cross-country, regional analysis, complemented by detailed
 analysis of the disaggregated datasets, where available.
 Finally, Chapter 5 summarizes conclusions and provides some
 recommendations for a possible way forward. In the medium to
 long term, access to municipal finance information would
 contribute to increasing transparency and accountability of
 local governments, improving revenue collection and
 expenditure performance, optimizing budget allocation
 procedures, and strengthen local authorities' role and
 position in intergovernmental fiscal considerations and
 negotiations in the SEE countries.