Governments that Achieve Results : Introducing Performance Mechanisms and Exploring the Trust Dimension
Author(s)
Felcman, DanielaKeywords
LEVELS OF TRUST IN GOVERNMENTSERVICE DELIVERY
BUDGETING
DEMOCRACY
INFORMATION SYSTEM
EXPENDITURE
ACCOUNTABILITY
RESULTS
INTERNATIONAL BANK
BUILDING TRUST IN GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC POLICY
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
GOVERNANCE REFORMS
TRANSPARENCY
CONFIDENCE
LEGAL OBLIGATIONS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL PUBLIC
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
WEB
POLITICIANS
EMERGING ECONOMIES
USERS
TRUST IN GOVERNMENT
POLITICAL COMMITMENT
ACCOUNTING
FISCAL CAPACITY
TAX
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
DELIVERY OF SERVICES
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
INSTITUTION
USES
PUBLIC SERVICES
LAWS
PUBLIC SECTOR
RESULT
PUBLIC SPENDING
CORRUPT
TAX COLLECTION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10154Abstract
Over the past few decades, a significant
 number of advanced countries and, more recently, some
 developing countries have moved the focus of their budget
 arrangements to emphasize performance. The recently
 published book results, performance budgeting and trust in
 Government follows from a conference on performance
 budgeting held in Mexico in June 2008 where a large range of
 experiences from Latin America and Organization for Economic
 Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries was presented.
 Its intention is to provide readers and governments wishing
 to improve elements of their performance budgeting with an
 understanding of the many elements involved in implementing
 these reforms, particularly in performance-informed
 budgeting (PIB), focusing on the challenges and the variety
 of approaches taken to meet these challenges. In many OECD
 and middle income countries, performance budgeting has been
 associated with the use of modern techniques of public
 management that emphasize individual and organizational
 responsibility and accountability for results. The books
 starts by providing an overview of PIB, building on two
 decades of experience and lesson learning, and sets out the
 key themes that provide the basis for discussions in the
 subsequent chapters. It looks at the roles of key
 decision-makers and institutions in creating a network of
 structured performance agreements4 throughout the budget cycle.Date
2012-08-13Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/10154http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10154
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Growth without GovernanceKraay, Aart; Kaufmann, Daniel (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-01)It is well known that there is a strong positive correlation between per capita incomes and the quality of governance across countries. the authors propose an empirical strategy that allows separation of this correlation into (1) a strong positive causal effect running from better governance to higher per capita incomes, and, perhaps surprisingly at first, (2) a weak and even negative causal effect running in the opposite direction from per capita incomes to governance. The first result confirms existing evidence on the importance of good governance for economic development. The second result is new and suggests the absence of a "virtuous circle" in which higher incomes lead to further improvements in governance. This motivates the authors' choice of title, "Growth Without Governance." They document this evidence using a newly updated set of worldwide governance-indicators covering 175 countries for the period 2000-01, and use the results to interpret the relationship between incomes and governance focusing on the Latin America and Caribbean region-within a worldwide empirical context. Finally, the authors speculate about the potential importance of elite influence and state capture in accounting for the surprising negative effects of per capita incomes on governance, present some evidence on such capture in some Latin American countries, and suggest priorities for actions to improve governance when such pernicious elite influence shapes public policy.
-
Local Governance in Developing CountriesShah, Anwar (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-06-05)This book develops a comparative institutional framework for responsive, responsible, and accountable governance in developing countries. It provides a synthesis of analytical literature on local governance. It traces the historical evolution of local governance and presents a stylized view of alternative models of local governance practiced in various countries. It also presents case studies for 10 countries by leading national and international scholars. The country case studies present an in-depth view of local government organization and finance in each country.
-
Decentralization and Local Governance in MENA : A Survey of Policies, Institutions, and PracticesWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-21)Entering the 21st century, the 1999-2000 World Development Report (WDR), identifies two main forces that are shaping the world in which development policy is being defined and implemented: (i) globalization, the increasing worldwide integration of private sector interaction and commercial relationships; and (ii) localization, a process of devolving fiscal and administrative roles and responsibilities from central to sub-national tiers of government. It goes on to note that these global-private and local-public pressures are not only reinforcing, but also challenging traditional paradigms and forms of intergovernmental systems. Political decentralization, often associated with pluralistic politics and representative government, aims to give citizens more say in public policy and decision-making. Its advocates assume that decisions made with greater participation will be better informed and more relevant to diverse interests in society than those made only by national political authorities. The concept implies that the selection of representatives from local electoral jurisdictions allows citizens to know better their political representatives and allows elected officials to know better the needs and desires of their constituents. Administrative decentralization aims to redistribute authority, responsibility and financial resources for providing public services among different levels of government. It typically takes three forms: de-concentration, delegation and devolution. Fiscal decentralization vests greater autonomy and authority with local governments in matters of fiscal importance, empowering local governments to generate their own revenues, through taxes and user charges, as well as determining their expenditure priorities based on a clear assignment of functions and responsibilities. Over the last two decades, it has been estimated that more than 100 countries, most of them in the developing world, have experimented with various forms of decentralization.