Government Expenditures on Education, Health, and Infrastructure : A Naive Look at Levels, Outcomes, and Efficiency
Keywords
DEREGULATIONPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
INFANT MORTALITY
INEFFICIENCY
LEVELS OF EFFICIENCY
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ROAD NETWORK
QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
SECTORAL POLICIES
OUTCOME MEASURES
SECTORAL ALLOCATION
RELATIVE IMPORTANCE
EMPIRICAL APPLICATION
CROSS-COUNTRY STUDIES
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
ELASTICITIES
HEALTH EXPENDITURE
PERFORMANCE IN EDUCATION
AVERAGE SHARE
TRANSPORT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ALLOCATION
AIR
DATA SET
PRODUCTION FUNCTION
OUTPUT INDICATORS
EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVICE DELIVERY
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
CONSTANT PRICES
COMPETITION POLICY
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
LOW INCOME
POLICY RESEARCH
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE LEVELS
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
PURCHASING POWER
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES
TAXPAYERS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
PROGRAMS
OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES
INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
INCOME LEVEL
NEGATIVE TERMS
COUNTRY LEVEL
EMPIRICAL LITERATURE
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
ROAD SECTOR
INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR
SANITATION
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
CAPITAL STOCK
DATA QUALITY
BENCHMARKS
SECTORAL EXPENDITURE
INCOME GROUPS
MONETARY DATA
FINANCIAL MARKETS
PRIVATE SECTOR
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE IN TRANSPORT
GDP
BENCHMARK
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
COUNTRY PERFORMANCE
INCOME
RAIL
POLITICAL SCIENTISTS
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
LENGTH OF ROAD
DATA ON CORRUPTION
EXPENDITURE DATA
EFFICIENCY OF GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
EDUCATION SERVICES
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
TOLL
SECTORAL BUDGET
FUNCTIONAL FORM
INCOME MEAN
ADJUSTMENT PROGRAMS
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
MORTALITY RATES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
RELATIVE POSITION
DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENDITURES
EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS
ROADS
SECTOR EXPENDITURE
FUEL
FISCAL ADJUSTMENT
ACCOUNTING
BENCHMARKING
CROSS-COUNTRY DATA
AIR TRAFFIC
MULTILATERAL DONORS
INTERVENTION
SAMPLE SIZE
OUTCOME INDICATORS
OUTCOME DATA
AIRCRAFT
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS
TRANSPORT = INFRASTRUCTURE
NATIONAL POLICIES
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES
TRANSPORT SECTOR
SECTORAL COMPOSITION
PUBLIC SECTOR
CAP
PRODUCTIVE SECTOR
POWER PARITY
CIVIL SERVANTS
DECENTRALIZATION
LIFE EXPECTANCY
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7066Abstract
All interested parties seem to agree
 that it is important to be able to monitor public sector
 performance at the sectoral level, but most current work
 based on multi-country databases does not lend itself to
 country-specific conclusions. This is due to a large extent
 to major data limitations both on sectoral expenditures and
 on sectoral outcomes. This paper discusses the related
 issues and shows what we can do with the current data
 inspite of the drastic limitations. The main conclusions of
 the paper are that any efforts to assess country-specific
 performances in relative terms are likely to be difficult in
 view of the data problems. A rough sense of performance
 across sectors can be estimated for groups of countries,
 allowing some modest benchmarking exercises. These estimates
 show that low-income countries generally lag significantly
 behind higher-income countries. Efficiency has improved
 during the 1990s in energy and education but has not
 improved significantly in transport.Date
2007-05Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/7066http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7066
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth : Lessons for Eastern Europe and Central AsiaGray, Cheryl; Varoudakis, Aristomene; Lane, Tracey (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-06-01)This study explores public finance
 policies in the transition countries of Europe and Central
 Asia (ECA) and their likely effects on economic growth. The
 analysis is organized in three parts. Part one reviews
 public finance systems across the ECA region with regard to
 overall size, structure of expenditures and revenues, and
 patterns of fiscal adjustment over time. It compares these
 patterns and trends in ECA countries against those in
 fast-growing economies in other regions, and it explores
 possible relationships between these public finance
 variables and rates of economic growth. Part two undertakes
 detailed analysis of public expenditures policies in four
 major areas: infrastructure, education, health, and
 pensions. Part three turns to the revenue side of the budget
 and looks in detail at two issues of particular importance
 in current policy debates: the impact of flat income tax
 reforms and the level and structure of taxes on labor.
-
Public Expenditure Policies in Southeast EuropeWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-14)The countries of Southeastern Europe
 (SEE) and the province of Kosovo (thereafter, Kosovo) have
 undergone a significant, though difficult, transition over
 the past decade. Series of conflicts in the region have
 complicated the transition process, which in the initial
 phase focused on macroeconomic stabilization and
 reconstruction. Helped by macroeconomic stability and
 efforts in advancing structural reforms, real Gross Domestic
 Product, or GDP growth in region has picked up this century,
 averaging 5.8 percent during 2000-2006, although it has
 still lagged the pace in both the more advanced reformers
 and the average for emerging Asia. In addition to boosting
 living standards, the SEE countries' shared aspiration
 to advance European Union (EU) integration has been
 increasingly shaping the reform agenda. This report reviews
 the level, composition and outcomes of government spending
 and distills some of the lessons that emerge from efforts by
 the SEE countries in reforming expenditure policies. The
 report identifies key remaining challenges and proposes a
 broad menu of options in further reforms of sectors that
 account for the largest shares of public spending across the
 countries, and where reforms are likely to have significant
 budgetary implications. This has motivated the choice of
 sectors discussed in the report: social protection
 (including pensions), health, education, public
 administration and infrastructure.
-
Financing Public Infrastructure in Sub-Saharan AfricaFoster, Viven; Smits, Karlis; Briceño-Garmendia, Cecilia (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-08)To be credible, any plan for scaling up
 infrastructure in Africa must rest on a thorough evaluation
 of how fiscal resources are allocated and financed. Because
 in every plausible scenario the public sector retains the
 lion's share of infrastructure financing, with private
 participation remaining limited, a central purpose of such
 an evaluation is to identify where and how fiscal resources
 can be better used if not increased without jeopardizing
 macroeconomic and fiscal stability. The stakes are high,
 because the magnitude of Africa's infrastructure needs
 carries a commensurate potential for misuse of scarce fiscal
 resources. The authors analyze recent public expenditure
 patterns to identify ways to make more fiscal resources
 available for infrastructure. The authors do this in three
 ways. First, we quantify the level and composition of public
 spending on infrastructure so as to match fiscal allocations
 to the particular characteristics of individual subsectors
 and to countries' macroeconomic type (low-income
 fragile, low-income no fragile, oil-exporting, and
 middle-income). Second, the authors evaluate public
 budgetary spending for infrastructure against macroeconomic
 conditions to get a sense of the scope for making additional
 fiscal resources available based on actual allocation
 decisions in recent years. And, third, the authors look for
 ways to make public spending for infrastructure more
 efficient, so as to better use existing resources. Any
 exercise of this kind encounters data limitations. First,
 because it was not feasible to visit all sub national
 entities, some decentralized infrastructure expenditures
 probably have been underrepresented, with particular
 implications for the water sector. Second, it was not always
 possible to fully identify which items of the budget are
 financed by donors, and contributions by nongovernmental
 organizations (NGOs) to rural infrastructure projects are
 likely to have been missed completely. Third, it was not
 always possible to obtain full financial statements for all
 of the infrastructure special funds that the authors
 identified. Fourth, accurate recording of annual changes in
 fixed capital formation (capital expenditure) of State-owned
 enterprises (SOEs) remains a methodological challenge.
 Fifth, accurate measurement of existing public
 infrastructure stock will require further methodological development.