Author(s)
International Finance CorporationKeywords
LIQUIDITYPRICING
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
MINORITY SHAREHOLDER
SHAREHOLDER
ACCOUNTABILITY
CENTRAL BANK
PRODUCTIVITY
COST OF FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
MARKET RISK
RETURN ON EQUITY
INTERNAL CONTROLS
INVESTMENTS
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
DEBT
INVESTMENT BANKING
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
BUSINESS CASE
AUDITS
TRANSPORT
TREASURY OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
GOVERNMENTS
VALUE
INVESTOR
EXTERNAL FINANCING
FINANCE CORPORATION
ENTERPRISES
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
INTERESTS
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
EMPLOYMENT POLICY
MARKET PRICE
BORROWERS
LAND
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS
PROFITABILITY
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SHAREHOLDERS
LABOR
INTERNATIONAL BANKING
MISMANAGEMENT
DEPOSITS
BANKING
PORTFOLIO
COST OF CAPITAL
FISCAL YEAR
CONSOLIDATION
CUSTOMER
MARKET PARTICIPANTS
BANKS
ASSET MANAGEMENT
FIRM PERFORMANCE
TRANSPARENCY
SUBSIDIARIES
FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SURVEY
MARKETS
AFFILIATED COMPANIES
SHARES
PROPERTY
REGULATORS
FUTURE
INTEREST RATES
PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
LABOR COSTS
SUBSIDIARY
ACCOUNTING
SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
FINANCIAL CRISIS
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
AUDIT
FOOD PRICES
EQUITY
HUMAN CAPITAL
INSURANCE
CRITERIA
LAWS
INTERNAL CONTROL
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
STRATEGIES
COMMERCIAL LOANS
PRIVATE EQUITY
INDUSTRY
EXTERNAL AUDITORS
SCANDALS
PRIVATE CAPITAL
COMMERCIAL BANK
BALANCE SHEET
AUDITORS
OPERATING EXPENSES
BANKING SECTOR
FINANCE
LOANS
INVESTOR RELATIONS
RETIREMENT
INVESTMENT DECISION
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
REPUTATION
JOB CREATION
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
NEW MARKETS
NET PROFIT
MICROFINANCE
SHARE
EMPLOYMENT
BIS
INTEREST
NONPERFORMING LOANS
RISK MANAGEMENT
LIQUIDITY RISK
INFRASTRUCTURE
CREDIT RISK
RISK
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE
CAPITAL BASE
REVENUE
FINANCIAL COMPANIES
CAPITALIZATION
CUSTOMER BASE
ISLAMIC BANKING
NEW PRODUCT
GOOD GOVERNANCE
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
GOVERNANCE
SERVICES
NET LOSS
ISLAMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK
GRANTS
COLLECTIONS
STOCK EXCHANGE
FIRM VALUATION
MANAGEMENT REPORTS
DEBT FINANCING
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
CAPITAL
PRICE
CUSTOMERS
SHARE OWNERSHIP
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INFLATION
AFFILIATES
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
INVESTORS
FINANCIAL SERVICES
PRICES
PROJECTS
LENDING
MINORITY SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION
NEW PRODUCTS
INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
OPERATIONAL RISK
COMMERCIAL LENDING
BANK
SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
REAL ESTATE
CREDIT
AFFILIATE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24790Abstract
This report summarizes the experiences
 of 19 companies from across the region. Each of the case
 studies highlights the key corporate governance changes made
 and the positive impacts that resulted, as reported by the
 company. The companies represent various countries, sectors,
 types, and sizes. All of the companies featured are former
 IFC Advisory Services clients. Some are IFC Investment
 clients as well. IFC conducted an in-depth corporate
 governance assessment for each of these companies using
 IFC’s Corporate Governance Methodology. The assessments
 resulted in specific recommendations on ways to improve each
 company’s governance framework and identified implementation
 plans. The assessments were conducted at various points over
 the past few years. The time taken to implement changes and
 realize benefits varied. However, all companies reported
 that governance changes are continuous and the corresponding
 benefits manifest themselves in different forms over time.
 This report provides examples of companies in various stages
 of change – from recent changes (e.g., Medgulf) to ongoing,
 longer-term changes (e.g., Bank Audi). This report also
 includes testimony from three MENA private equity firms (all
 IFC investment clients). Collectively, these firms have
 worked with 72 investee companies (past and present funds).
 Selected based on their association with IFC and their
 willingness to share their insight and experiences, these
 firms offer a valuable window into the importance of
 corporate governance from an investor’s perspective. The
 material in this report is based on feedback gathered
 through individual interviews with each organization
 featured, resulting in well-considered responses. The
 achievements highlighted are all the more notable given that
 the interviews and information gathering process took place
 in in late 2009 (first edition) and 2013 (for current
 edition), when the region was still under the stress of the crisis.Date
2016-08-03Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/24790http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24790
Copyright/License
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : VietnamWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-11-19)This report assesses Vietnam's corporate governance policy framework. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulation, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Vietnam. It is an update of the 2006 Corporate Governance ROSC for Vietnam. Good corporate governance enhances investor trust, protects minority shareholders, and encourages better decision making and improved relations with workers, creditors, and other stakeholders. Better investor protection can lower the cost of capital and encourage companies to list and raise funds through equity markets. Good corporate governance also helps to ensure that these companies operate more transparently and efficiently. Vietnam has undertaken important corporate governance reforms in recent years. However protecting minority shareholders, fully tapping the potential of capital markets, and professionalizing boards and management will require that reform continues. Key reforms include: Developing an action plan to address core failings of state owned enterprise corporate governance, including replacing the current state economic groups, or SEG oriented system with one that has more accountable state ownership; and Increasing transparency with greater auditor independence, better disclosure of ownership and control, and convergence of accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS.
-
Practical Guide to Corporate GovernanceInternational Finance Corporation; OECD (International Finance Corporation, Washington, D.C., 2017-08-29)This publication details 14 firms
 recognized for better corporate governance practices that
 had suffered less damage than average listed Latin American
 companies during the finanicial crisis. It offers an
 opportunity for business leaders in Latin America to learn
 from the experience of peers who have successfully
 implemented substantive improvements in governance standards
 and practices. Although the guide has been in the works for
 several years, the timing of its publication coincides with
 a global financial crisis that has catapulted corporate
 governance to a top spot on the global policy agenda. With
 gaps in governance from inadequate risk management to
 distorted incentives structures factoring in as contributing
 to the crisis, good corporate governance practices will be
 an important part of the response needed for Latin American
 economies, as well for others around the world. Within this
 context, there has been a remarkable growth in awareness and
 activity surrounding corporate governance during the last
 decade, as recognized by the Latin American roundtable on
 corporate governance. This is an ongoing initiative of the
 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and
 the International Finance Corporation/World Bank Group that
 has brought together policy-makers, regulators, stock
 exchanges, investors, companies and other stakeholders on an
 annual basis to promote improved policies and practices
 specific to the Latin American context. This practical guide
 is an outgrowth of these efforts, involving many steps along
 the way. When members of the Roundtable called for greater
 participation from private sector companies in the
 Roundtable's corporate governance improvement efforts,
 the companies circle was born. A first book of case studies
 was launched in 2005, with an expanded second edition issued
 in 2006. Members of the circle were keen to share
 experiences and believed a wider audience of Latin
 businesspeople will benefit from a practical guide exploring
 the ways and whys of their governance improvements.
-
Sovereign Wealth Funds and Long-Term Development Finance : Risks and OpportunitiesTordo, Silvana; Arfaa, Noora; Halland, Havard; Gelb, Alan; Smith, Gregory (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-02)Sovereign wealth funds represent a large
 and growing pool of savings. An increasing number of these
 funds are owned by natural resource exporting countries and
 have a variety of objectives, including intergenerational
 equity and macroeconomic stabilization. Traditionally, these
 funds have invested in external assets, especially
 securities traded in major markets. But the persistent
 infrastructure financing gap in developing countries has
 motivated some governments to encourage their sovereign
 wealth funds to invest domestically. This paper proposes
 some basic elements of a conceptual framework to create a
 system of checks and balances to help ensure that the
 sovereign wealth funds do not undermine macroeconomic
 management or become a vehicle for politically driven
 "investments." First, the risks and opportunities
 of domestic investment by sovereign wealth funds are
 analyzed. Central issues are the relationship of sovereign
 wealth fund financing to the budget process and to the
 procurement systems of sector ministries, as well as the
 establishment of appropriate benchmarks and safeguards to
 ensure the integrity of investment decisions. The paper
 argues that a well-governed sovereign wealth fund, with a
 sound mandate and professional management and staffing, can
 possibly improve the quality of the public investment
 program. But its mandate should not duplicate that of other
 government institutions with investment mandates, such as
 the budget, the national development bank, the investment
 authority, and state-owned enterprises. Establishing rules
 on the type of investment (for example, commercial and/or
 quasi-commercial) and its modalities (for example, no
 controlling stakes, leveraging private investment) is one
 way to ensure separation between the activities of the
 sovereign wealth fund and those of other institutions. The
 critical issue remains that of limiting the sovereign wealth
 fund's investment scope to that appropriate for a
 wealth fund. If investments that generate quasi-market
 returns are permitted, the size of the home bias should be
 clearly stipulated and these investments should be reported separately.