Decentralization and Local Democracy
 in the World : First Global Report by United Cities and
 Local Governments 2008
Keywords
FINANCIAL TRANSFERSLOCAL POPULATIONS
CITIZENSHIP
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES
MUNICIPAL COUNCILS
ACCOUNTABILITY
ELECTED OFFICIALS
CONSTITUTIONS
MANDATES
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAFF
GRANT ALLOCATION
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
CABINET
LEGAL ENTITIES
CITIZENS
PUBLIC LIFE
DECENTRALIZATION REFORMS
DEMOCRATIZATION
REVENUE COLLECTION
MUNICIPAL TAX
DECISION-MAKING POWER
INTERMEDIATE TIER OF GOVERNMENT
STATE POWER
NATIONAL LEVEL
TRANSPORT
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL OFFICIALS
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL BUDGET
MEMBER STATES
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT
ASSETS
PUBLIC LAW
PUBLIC AFFAIRS
ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES
FINANCIAL AUTONOMY
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT
LOCAL ADMINISTRATION
PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS
RATIONALIZATION
FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS
CONSENSUS
LOCAL COMMUNITY
DIRECT DEMOCRACY
DEMOCRACY
PARLIAMENT
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
FINANCIAL CAPACITY
DECISION-MAKING
CIVIL SOCIETY
NATURAL RESOURCES
SUFFRAGE
COUNCILS
ELECTION
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS
EQUALIZATION
NATIONAL TERRITORY
LOCAL ECONOMY
URBAN SERVICES
GOVERNORS
TRANSPARENCY
LEGISLATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
FEDERAL SYSTEMS
NATIONAL UNITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITIES
CENTRAL CONTROL
HUMAN RESOURCES
REVOLUTION
MUNICIPAL PROPERTY
TAX REVENUES
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION
COUPS D'ETAT
LOCAL ELECTIONS
LEGAL SYSTEM
REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
EXECUTIVE BODIES
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTONOMY
REHABILITATION
MUNICIPALITIES
CAPITALS
LOCAL PARTICIPATION
PUBLIC SERVICES
GOVERNMENT LEVELS
LOCAL MANAGEMENT
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LEGITIMACY
LAWS
DECONCENTRATION
PUBLIC SECTOR
TAX SYSTEM
TAX COLLECTION
HEADS OF STATE
PREFECTURES
INTERNATIONAL NETWORK
CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEMS
ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION
TOWNSHIPS
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
REPUBLICS
PARTICIPATIVE DEMOCRACY
TAX SYSTEMS
TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM
NATIONS
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
CONSTITUENCIES
LEGISLATURE
ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTIONS
DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC INTEREST
LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
SOCIAL INCLUSION
LOCAL TAX
GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES
DIVISION OF POWERS
URBANIZATION
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION
LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
EMPLOYMENT
DEVOLUTION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DISTRIBUTION OF POWERS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
POLITICAL POWER
LEGALITY
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
TAXATION
LEGAL PROTECTION
LOCAL SERVICES
CANDIDATES
LOCAL RESOURCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
FEDERAL STATES
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
KINGDOMS
REVENUE MOBILIZATION
LOCAL TAXES
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
CAPITAL CITIES
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS
COLONIES
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
EXPENDITURE
GOOD GOVERNANCE
FISCAL POWER
PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY
DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY
LOCAL AUTONOMY
MONARCHY
PUBLIC POLICY
REGIONAL INTEGRATION
MUNICIPALITY
DECREES
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
POLITICAL SYSTEMS
DISTRICTS
DEMOCRATIC MODEL
PUBLIC RESOURCES
LOCAL POPULATION
FINANCIAL SERVICES
PARTY AFFILIATION
INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
MUNICIPAL
LOCAL BODIES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
VOTING
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
CONSTITUTION
URBAN GOVERNMENTS
TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITIES
GOVERNMENT ACTION
EXECUTIVE POWER
ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS
TAX RATES
STATE AUTHORITY
LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
POLITICAL SYSTEM
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2609Abstract
This overall picture of decentralization
 and local democracy in African countries shows significant
 progress at the strictly institutional level. No country now
 publicly opposes the implementation of decentralization
 policies. Local governments exist in all countries, and
 elections are held to elect local authorities. The extent of
 such progress must, however, be set against a number of
 persistent obstacles that continue to hinder a real
 progression of decentralization in Africa. Difficulties
 remain within states concerning the transfer of financial
 resources needed to match the devolved responsibilities.
 Local governments also face difficulties in increasing their
 own resources (aside from state-transfers and grants) at a
 faster pace. Ensuring the availability of qualified human
 resources at the local level and improving public access to
 local services are also fundamental issues of concern.Date
2009Type
Publications & Research :: PublicationIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2609978-0-8213-7734-5
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2609
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World : First Global Report by United Cities and Local Governments 2008United Cities and Local Government; World Bank (Washington, DC: United Cities and Local Government and the World Bank, 2012-03-19)This overall picture of decentralization and local democracy in African countries shows significant progress at the strictly institutional level. No country now publicly opposes the implementation of decentralization policies. Local governments exist in all countries, and elections are held to elect local authorities. The extent of such progress must, however, be set against a number of persistent obstacles that continue to hinder a real progression of decentralization in Africa. Difficulties remain within states concerning the transfer of financial resources needed to match the devolved responsibilities. Local governments also face difficulties in increasing their own resources (aside from state-transfers and grants) at a faster pace. Ensuring the availability of qualified human resources at the local level and improving public access to local services are also fundamental issues of concern.
-
Local Government Discretion and Accountability : Application of a Local Governance FrameworkWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-03-01)This report evaluates the framework of decentralization reforms instituted in decentralizing countries. Decentralization is a multi-faceted process which includes giving discretion to local governments and establishing accountability mechanisms at three different levels of governance: political, administrative and fiscal. Therefore, the analysis of the decentralization reforms should also be based on an inter-disciplinary approach. The report applies this framework to ten countries and two sectors and uses the case studies as the primary data collection tool. These case studies provide detailed contextual analysis of the political, administrative and fiscal aspects of decentralization. The countries identified for the case studies are Angola, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Uganda, Kerala/India, Philippines, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Rwanda and Punjab/Pakistan. The sectors identified are health and education. The review of these case studies suggests that most of the local governments do not fare well on many assessment criteria of well-designed decentralization. In addition to the insubstantial discretion available to the local governments, accountability mechanisms are also not well developed.
-
Decentralization and Local Governance in MENA : A Survey of Policies, Institutions, and PracticesWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-21)Entering the 21st century, the 1999-2000 World Development Report (WDR), identifies two main forces that are shaping the world in which development policy is being defined and implemented: (i) globalization, the increasing worldwide integration of private sector interaction and commercial relationships; and (ii) localization, a process of devolving fiscal and administrative roles and responsibilities from central to sub-national tiers of government. It goes on to note that these global-private and local-public pressures are not only reinforcing, but also challenging traditional paradigms and forms of intergovernmental systems. Political decentralization, often associated with pluralistic politics and representative government, aims to give citizens more say in public policy and decision-making. Its advocates assume that decisions made with greater participation will be better informed and more relevant to diverse interests in society than those made only by national political authorities. The concept implies that the selection of representatives from local electoral jurisdictions allows citizens to know better their political representatives and allows elected officials to know better the needs and desires of their constituents. Administrative decentralization aims to redistribute authority, responsibility and financial resources for providing public services among different levels of government. It typically takes three forms: de-concentration, delegation and devolution. Fiscal decentralization vests greater autonomy and authority with local governments in matters of fiscal importance, empowering local governments to generate their own revenues, through taxes and user charges, as well as determining their expenditure priorities based on a clear assignment of functions and responsibilities. Over the last two decades, it has been estimated that more than 100 countries, most of them in the developing world, have experimented with various forms of decentralization.