Serbia and Montenegro : Public Expenditure and Institutional Review, Volume 3. Montenegro
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
BANK RESTRUCTURINGFINANCIAL REPORTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
UTILITIES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REFORM
FISCAL STANCE
SAVINGS
ACCOUNTABILITY
SOCIAL INSURANCE
FINANCIAL SECTORS
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY
ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
TAX REVENUE
ANTI-CORRUPTION
POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION
CITIZENS
ALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT RESOURCES
GOVERNMENTAL REFORM
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
SOCIAL PROTECTION
BANKING SECTOR
BUDGET SYSTEM
ECONOMIC SHOCKS
REFORM IMPLEMENTATION
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
HEALTH SERVICES
ECONOMIC POLICIES
FISCAL REFORM
RETIREMENT
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC SERVICE
EVASION
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
TAX
SOCIAL SECURITY
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS
WELFARE ECONOMICS
FINANCIAL SECTOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
CIVIL SERVICE
ENTERPRISE RESTRUCTURING
ECONOMIC GROWTH
WATER SUPPLY PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
HEALTH SPENDING
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
EXECUTION
DEFAULT RISK
BANK SUPERVISION
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC DEBT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
FINANCIAL BENEFITS
ELECTRICITY
BUDGET FORMULATION
FISCAL CONTROL
FOREIGN BORROWING
TAXATION
CREDITWORTHINESS
DEPOSITS
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
RATIONALIZATION
FISCAL GAP
WAGES
INSOLVENT BANKS
PROVISIONS
SOCIAL EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT DEBT
BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURES
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
TAX COMPLIANCE
FISCAL YEAR
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
EXPENDITURE REFORM
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
TAX BURDEN
AUDITING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
PRIVATE SECTOR
DEBT SERVICE
BANKING SYSTEM
TREASURY
EBF
INSOLVENT
COMMERCIAL BANKS
BANKRUPTCY
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
TRANSPARENCY
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT
FISCAL
LEGISLATION
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
INTEREST COSTS
FISCAL CONSOLIDATION
DEBT FINANCING
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
FISCAL DEFICIT
PENSIONS
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
INTEREST RATES
CENTRAL BANK FUNCTIONS
FISCAL DEFICITS
INFLATION
REFORM POLICY
FISCAL GAPS
TAX REVENUES
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
LIQUIDATION
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
SOCIAL SERVICES
RESERVE REQUIREMENT
PUBLIC FINANCE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
FISCAL POLICIES
TAX ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MUNICIPALITIES
DOMESTIC BORROWING
TAX LAWS
PUBLIC SERVICES
VOUCHER PRIVATIZATION
TAX RATES
PUBLIC HEALTH
FISCAL PROBLEMS
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
STATE SUBSIDIES
FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
BUDGET DEFICIT
GROWTH PROMOTION
PUBLIC SPENDING
FOREIGN DEBT
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14770Abstract
This Public Expenditure and
 Institutional Review (PEIR) aims to help the government of
 the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) in taking their
 public expenditure reforms further. It analyzes public
 expenditure practices, and institutions of the two Republics
 - Serbia and Montenegro - and of the Federal Government,
 and, evaluates their decision-making, and implementation
 processes. The cross-cutting topics of the PEIR are:
 sustainability of public expenditures; strategic allocation
 of public spending, to maximize growth and welfare within
 fiscally sustainable limits; and, accountability of the
 public expenditure system, needed to maintain domestic, and
 international support for the reconstruction programs of the
 two Republics. The success of reforms depends on difficult
 strategic choices: 1) the inherited, distorted fiscal
 systems, and inefficient budget management practices, call
 for a realistic focus in selecting the goals of reform; 2)
 the best solution choice must be derived from the existing
 structures, and practices; and, 3) the Governments of Serbia
 and Montenegro should focus on deepening the reforms already
 initiated, rather than launching a number of new ones. The
 first volume provides an overview of the public expenditure
 reform agenda; volume two focuses on the Republic of Serbia
 and the Federal Government, while volume three discusses
 public expenditure management issues in Montenegro. The
 public expenditure problems of the Federal level receive a
 somewhat limited treatment, as the contours of the future
 union government takes shape. Similarly, challenges of
 fiscal decentralization below the Republic level, receive
 only a brief treatment, actually only in the Serbia volume.Date
2013-08-01Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14770http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14770
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Pakistan - Khyber Pakhtunkhwa : Public Expenditure ReviewWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-10-02)Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) is one of the
 least-developed and crisis-prone provinces in Pakistan.
 Located in far north of the country, the province covers 10
 percent of the total land area and is a home to 13 percent
 of the country's population spread over seven
 administrative districts. Majority of the population (83
 percent) is rural, averaging 7.6 members per household-well
 above the national average of 6.6. The literacy rate remains
 low at 49 percent with more than half of population having
 no access to tap water while unemployment runs at 8.5
 percent. KP's relative underperformance is primarily
 due to low levels of growth, socio-economic underdevelopment
 and lack of public services compared to other provinces of
 Pakistan. Cognizant of the challenges to growth in KP and
 acting upon the assessment of Pakistan Government's
 Post-Crisis Needs Assessment (PCNA) of the region in October
 2010, the donors agreed on a harmonized approach to meet the
 short- and medium-term social and economic needs of KP,
 including the establishment of a Multi-Donor Trust Fund
 (MDTF). This Public Expenditure Review (PER) of KP was
 undertaken in partnership with the government of KP and is
 one of the important outcomes of PCNA funded by the MDTF.
 The report on Operationalization of Post Crisis Needs
 Assessment (OPCNA) highlighted the need for strengthening
 KP's public financial management (PFM) as fundamental
 to improving public services and therefore the quality of
 life in KP. The report acknowledges the strong government
 ownership of reform initiatives which are taken with a view
 of strengthening all aspects of public finances. KP adopted
 a comprehensive fiscal reform program in 2001-02 based on
 four pillars, namely: 1) enhancing resources; 2)
 strengthening ex-ante and ex-post PFM reforms; 3) fiscal
 decentralization; and 4) instituting an output-based
 accountability mechanism.
-
West Bank and Gaza Public Expenditure Review : From Crisis to Greater Fiscal Independence, Volume 2World Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-12)This report examines the fiscal crisis
 facing the Palestinian Authority (PA) that could threaten
 its very existence. It looks at recent macroeconomic and
 fiscal developments and gives and analysis of key issues and
 challenges such as economic and fiscal trends. The report
 also goes in depth analysis of the public financial
 management issues, the challenges of civil service reform,
 reforming intergovernmental fiscal relations, the education
 sector, and social policy and social safety nets. The report
 is divided into two volumes with volume one giving an
 overview with conclusions and recommendations, while volume
 gives an in depth look at the topics.
-
Lebanon : Public Expenditure Review, Reform Priorities for Fiscal Adjustment, Growth and Poverty AlleviationWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-19)Lebanon's current priority -- in the face of high public deficits and unsustainable debt dynamics -- is to contain and rationalize public expenditures in every possible sector while improving the efficiency of social spending. The needed containment of primary public expenditures should be understood as a transition to restore fiscal sustainability and enhance growth prospects. This Public Expenditure Review aims to assist Lebanon in its fiscal stabilization effort. The containment of public expenditures could entail painful choices, which will first require an analysis to identify where spending pressures lie (e.g., contingent liabilities, social sectors), and how to address them. And ideally, eliminating non productive spending should replace containment as the main instrument of adjustment. The report seeks to identify what critical and realistic short and longer term measures can be implemented to achieve this objective. The report is organized as follows. Chapter 1 provides the macro-economic framework and discusses the need for fiscal adjustment. Chapter 2 looks for possibilities to contain primary expenditures in the next five years. Chapter 3 reviews the efficiency for current social expenditures, and explores ways to improve their efficiency with the view to improving support for human development during the ordinary course o f the economy and preventing human capital deterioration during any possible economic crisis. Finally, Chapter 4 discusses options to improve civil service and move towards performance budgeting in the medium-to-long run.