Author(s)
World BankKeywords
ECONOMIC REFORMREVENUE TRANSFERS
FINANCIAL REPORTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
STATE REVENUES
ACCOUNT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
PAYROLL
ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
INTERNAL AUDITORS
INSTITUTION BUILDING
MINISTERS
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
REPUBLICS
EXTERNAL AUDITS
ANTI-CORRUPTION
INTERNAL CONTROLS
CITIZENS
ACCOUNTING& REPORTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
AUDITORS
INTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
REVENUE GROWTH
FIDUCIARY RISK
SOCIAL PROTECTION
BUDGETARY SUPPORT
BUDGET SYSTEM
BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
BUDGET PREPARATION
BUDGET PROCESS
TRANSPORT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
SOCIAL SECTOR
BUDGETARY FUNDS
HUMAN RESOURCE
SOCIAL SECTORS
PRIVATIZATION
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
TAX
TAX POLICY
EXCISE TAXES
INTERNAL AUDITING
CORRUPT PRACTICES
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC RECOVERY
STATE BUDGET
FINANCIAL SECTOR
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
STAFF RECRUITMENT
CIVIL SERVICE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
FISCAL REVENUE
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
CAPACITY BUILDING
EXECUTION
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
ACCOUNTANTS
PROCUREMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
BUDGET FORMULATION
INTERNAL AUDITS
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL AUDITING STANDARDS
ADJUSTMENT LENDING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSENSUS
CASH ACCOUNTING
AUTHORITY
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
BUDGETING
DEMOCRACY
DECISION-MAKING
FINANCIAL CAPACITY
STATE FUNDS
CASH BASIS ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
JUDICIAL REFORM
EXPENDITURE
AUDITING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
CORPORATE INCOME TAXES
PRIVATE SECTOR
LEGAL REFORM
TREASURY
EBF
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
FISCAL
LEGISLATION
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
DIVIDEND PAYOUT
BUDGET EXECUTION
DEPRECIATION
JUDICIARY
CENTRAL TRANSFERS
WATER SUPPLY INTERNAL CONTROLS
BORROWING
ACCOUNTS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
PENSIONS
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
GOVERNMENT SPENDING POLICY
FISCAL DEFICITS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
INFLATION
ROADS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
TAX REVENUES
FINANCIAL CONTROL
ACCOUNTING
BUDGET SYSTEMS
SOCIAL SERVICES
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
TAX ADMINISTRATION
AUTONOMOUS REGIONS
ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES
BUDGET CONTROL
REHABILITATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
CONSTITUTION
GOVERNMENT ACTION
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LAWS
STATE AGENCIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14587Abstract
A number of in-depth studies were
 conducted between the time of the preparation of the first
 draft CFAA report in May 2002 and the final mission in
 February 2003. These included a PER, CPAR and an IMF Report
 on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) mission.
 Each of these missions identified a number of serious
 weaknesses and made recommendations to address them. Some of
 these weaknesses had been identified in the CFAA report and
 others represented new findings. These new findings and
 their associated recommendations have been reflected in the
 final CFAA report, sometimes by explicit inclusion, other
 times by reference. As a result, this final report has a
 strong emphasis on the internal control framework and
 fiduciary risks and presents specific short- and medium-term
 recommendations to mitigate them. In conducting its mission,
 the team noted that the availability and reliability of
 financial information beyond routine budget utilization data
 is severely limited, precluding analysis in a number of
 areas. Improving the quality of reliable, complete and
 accurate financial information is essential for sound
 management decision-making. This report makes four priority
 and an additional twenty-one recommendations. They are
 designed to strengthen the legal foundation for internal
 financial control, construct a modem internal control
 framework, and develop the human capacity to administer them
 successfully. Internal controls must be the priority of the
 Government if it is to reduce its fiduciary risk. The four
 priority most areas of risk for the Government of Georgia
 include: implement a sound legal foundation for effective
 financial controls, build the internal audit function,
 strengthen the external audit function, and build staff
 capacities in financial management and auditing.Date
2013-07-25Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14587http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14587
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kingdom of Morocco : Country Financial Accountability AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2003-06)This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) reviews Morocco's public sector financial management system, largely based on the French system that separates accounting practices from services organization, and from the initial expenditure control to the latter jurisdictional control. The Moroccan system appears largely robust, characterized by legal institutions; however, this seemingly, poses delays affecting the relation between public expenditures, and its results. Given these apparent weaknesses, the Government fostered reforms to modernize public administration, and improve services delivery. Recommendations included in this CFAA to improve public sector efficiency, address actions to improve budget preparation, and to formally standardize budgetary information to Parliament. Budget implementation should be made public, supported by legislation, while improved ministerial support should be ensured in human resources expenditures, and management; similarly, information related to investment payments should be improved, and itemized. Public expenditures control should be developed, ensuring performance in parallel to public spending, and, the role of ministerial inspections should be reinforced, through a regulatory framework, and enforcement of recommendations.
-
Province of Santa Fe, Republic of Argentina : Public Financial Management AssessmentWorld Bank (CC BY 3.0 Unported, 2012-12-06)The assessment for the Province of Santa
 Fe was prepared jointly by the Ministry of Finance of the
 Province of Santa Fe and the World Bank (WB) on the basis of
 findings from missions. It seeks to: (i) provide the
 provincial government with a reference tool for dialogue and
 action to strengthen their public financial management
 systems; (ii) assess the province's PFM systems and
 identify and address their main fiduciary issues, as well as
 their impact on the implementation of World Bank operations;
 and (iii) contribute in a broader sense to the dialogue
 between the Bank and Argentina's national and
 provincial authorities regarding fiduciary portfolio
 management and reliance on the country's systems. The
 assessment is not a fully fledged PFM performance report
 using all PEFA performance indicators. As agreed with the
 provincial government and the World Bank s Country
 Management Unit, the team selected and used 19 PFM
 performance indicators (PI 1, PI 4, PI 5-7, PI 9-12, PI
 16-18, and PI 20-26) to review the status of PFM in the
 province. The report was prepared based on the findings of
 the missions that visited Argentina in the first semester of
 2009 and refers to the 2006-2008 fiscal years. The report
 was completed in June 2012 and highlights the progress and
 improvement in some PFM areas since 2009 whenever provided
 by the Province (in footnotes wherever appropriate).
-
Republic of South Sudan Public Finance Management Assessment : Western Equatoria StateWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-05-31)The purpose of the assessment is to
 assess the public finance management (PFM) system
 performance of the Government of Western Equatoria State.
 The effort is one of a number of Public Expenditure
 Financial Accountability, or PEFA assessments being
 conducted in South Sudan: the others focus on Government of
 Republic of South Sudan (GRSS), Unity State, Jonglei State
 and Northern Bahr el Ghazal State. These assessments will
 later feed into a Country Integrated Fiduciary Assessment
 (CIFA) along with a country procurement assessment report
 being prepared by another World Bank team on the procurement
 systems of GRSS and the same state governments. The
 assessment team received a lot of support and cooperation
 from state officials. The DG of taxation had attended the
 PEFA orientation and introduction workshop in April 2011 in
 Juba. The team appreciated this support, and without it the
 extent of its work would have been very limited given the
 short time the team was in the state. Prior reconnaissance
 by the assessment team with key state officials proved to be
 a key success factor in this assessment.