Author(s)
World BankKeywords
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLESRISK OF FRAUD
FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
BUDGET MONITORING
FINANCIAL REPORTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
BILLS
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTABILITY
SOCIAL INSURANCE
OLIGARCHY
EXPENDITURES
TOWNSHIPS
BOOKKEEPING
REPUBLICS
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
AUDITING STANDARDS
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
BALANCE SHEET
INTERNAL CONTROLS
CITIZENS
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT
BANKING SUPERVISION
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
LEGISLATURE
BANKING SECTOR
AUTHORIZATION
PUBLIC FINANCES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEWS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
BUDGET PROCESS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROCESSES
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
NATIONAL LEVEL
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
BUDGET REVENUES
BUDGETARY FUNDS
FISCAL REFORM
TREASURY OPERATIONS
INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
CASH FLOWS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
TAX
INTERNAL AUDITING
CORRUPT PRACTICES
DECISION MAKING
FINANCIAL SECTOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
EXECUTION
ACCOUNTANTS
PROCUREMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING
TAX COLLECTIONS
BUDGET FORMULATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE
TAXATION
GOVERNMENT AGENCY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSENSUS
BUDGET PERFORMANCE
BUDGETING
DEMOCRACY
CONSOLIDATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
AUDITING
PRIVATE SECTOR
PUBLIC POLICY
EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
BANKING SYSTEM
TREASURY
BUDGETARY ORGANIZATIONS
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
TRANSPARENCY
LEGISLATION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK ACCOUNT
FISCAL
LOWER HOUSE
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL
BUDGET EXECUTION
BUDGET FINANCING
JUDICIARY
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
UPPER HOUSE
POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
ACCOUNTS
BORROWING
ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS
HUMAN RESOURCES
ANTI- CORRUPTION
SOCIAL POLICY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
INSOLVENCY
DISTRICTS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
CHECKING
FINANCIAL CONTROL
ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
BUSINESS PROCESSES
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
TAX ADMINISTRATION
REVENUE MANAGEMENT
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MUNICIPALITIES
CONSTITUTION
TAX LAWS
OFF-BUDGET SUBSIDIES
SUBNATIONAL FINANCES
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
STATE AGENCIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
CASH MANAGEMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION OBJECTIVES
TAX COLLECTION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14698Abstract
This CFAA concentrates, by design, on
 federal-level public sector financial management in the
 Russian Federation. Its results feed into the fiduciary
 discussion presented in the new Russian Federation Country
 Assistance Strategy (CAS), and into the Core Integrative
 Fiduciary Assessment (CIFA). In budget management the CFAA
 recommends 1) strengthening the strategy phase of budget
 preparation to link macroeconomic resource constraints and
 sectoral and program targets; 2) adopting a uniform,
 simplified budget coding structure; 3) adopting a more
 participatory approach to budget planning and formulation;
 4) introducing accounting principles by entities with
 extra-budgetary funds and preparing reports that are
 compatible with Treasury accounts and fiscal reporting; 5)
 preparing a program of institutional development for the MOF
 and applying modem information technology; and 6) amending
 the chart of accounts (COA) to fully reflect the budget
 classification. The development and implementation of a
 full-function Treasury system will take several years and is
 not expected to become fully operational before 2004/05. In
 the interim, the CFAA recommends immediate implementation of
 an improved system of expenditure monitoring, extension of
 Treasury control of expenditure commitments to all items of
 the economic expenditure classification, and replacement of
 weekly cash finding limits by monthly funding of
 established expenditure commitments. In accounting and
 financial reporting, some recommendations are to 0 review of
 existing budget classifications and coding structures and
 design of a revised structure and COA that conform with the
 IMF GFS classification; and to integrate the two existing
 coding systems. To improve internal controls and internal
 auditing, the report recommends regarding the internal audit
 as an important management tool, shifting to a new model,
 based on service orientation and performance/risk
 assessment, internal audit functions becoming independent
 from other organizational and functional departments, staff
 reporting directly to the head of the organization,
 regulating the entity by an audit charter, and audit
 functions be carried out by multi-disciplinary teams. As for
 external audits, the CFAA strongly supports the
 Chambers' program of institutional and methodological
 improvements, in particular its preparation of a long- term
 plan to assess public institutions' performance (value
 for money) in the use of public funds. Finally, the CFAA
 finds that the World Bank is adequately discharging its
 financial management fiduciary responsibilities with respect
 to its lending operations. The CFAA risk assessment
 concludes that the current ring-fencing approach to project
 implementation arrangements should be maintained,
 recognizing that--based on the effective operationalization
 of the reforms being introduced in public financial
 accountability--the present arrangements could in due course
 be subject to revision.Date
2003-09-16Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14698http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14698
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kingdom of Morocco : Country Financial Accountability AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2003-06)This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) reviews Morocco's public sector financial management system, largely based on the French system that separates accounting practices from services organization, and from the initial expenditure control to the latter jurisdictional control. The Moroccan system appears largely robust, characterized by legal institutions; however, this seemingly, poses delays affecting the relation between public expenditures, and its results. Given these apparent weaknesses, the Government fostered reforms to modernize public administration, and improve services delivery. Recommendations included in this CFAA to improve public sector efficiency, address actions to improve budget preparation, and to formally standardize budgetary information to Parliament. Budget implementation should be made public, supported by legislation, while improved ministerial support should be ensured in human resources expenditures, and management; similarly, information related to investment payments should be improved, and itemized. Public expenditures control should be developed, ensuring performance in parallel to public spending, and, the role of ministerial inspections should be reinforced, through a regulatory framework, and enforcement of recommendations.
-
Local Public Financial ManagementShah, Anwar (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-05-30)This volume provides an overview of local government financial accounting and reporting and where better practices in cash management are documented. The use of transparent procurement processes to mitigate corruption is also elaborated on while practical guidance is imparted on how and when to use debt, how to assess debt affordability, what debt to use, how to issue debt, and how to manage debt. The use of internal controls and audits to ensure efficiency and integrity is highlighted in this volume with particular emphasis on the role of external audit in combating corruption. Audit methods to detect corruption are also presented and discussed. The volume represents a collaborative effort of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency and the World Bank Institute to support reform of the public expenditure management and financial accountability systems in developing countries, especially in Africa.
-
Iraq Public Expenditure and Institutional Assessment, Volume 1World Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)The public expenditure and institutional
 assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors.
 First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its
 international development partners have recognized the
 critical importance of sound management of Iraq's
 substantial public financial resources. Both parties support
 the reform and modernization of public financial management
 (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq
 (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the
 importance of establishing a baseline against which progress
 in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for
 an assessment which provides the information necessary to
 measure the performance of a country's PFM system.
 Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the
 past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for
 PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can
 help to shape and prioritize the necessary development
 program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume
 one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA)
 assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM
 issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital
 investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq
 financial management information system (IFMIS), public
 accounting and accountability, and payroll management.
 Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the
 PEFA assessment.