World Bank Engagement at the State
 Level : The Cases of Brazil, India, Nigeria, and the Russian Federation
Author(s)
Independent Evaluation GroupKeywords
BORROWERDEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
ADOPTION
LEADERSHIP
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
REVENUES
FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES
COOPERATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
PURCHASING POWER PARITY
INTERNATIONAL BANK
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MINISTERS
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
INVESTMENTS
FINANCING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
STOCK
FISCAL FEDERALISM
DEBT
GENDER POLICY
FINANCIAL SECTOR ASSESSMENT
FINANCIAL SECTOR REFORM
TRANSPORT
FISCAL REFORM
ECONOMIC POLICIES
PEOPLE
INITIATIVE
GUARANTEE
STATE
GOVERNMENTS
MARKET ECONOMY
VALUE
INTERESTS
GUARANTEES
TAX CAPACITY
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
AGREEMENTS
SOVEREIGN GUARANTEE
PUBLIC
LABOR
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
CAPACITY BUILDING
ADVISORY SERVICES
FINANCE MANAGEMENT
CREDITWORTHINESS
BANK LENDING
DEMOCRACY
FISCAL REFORMS
FINANCIAL CAPACITY
ECONOMIC REFORMS
NATURAL RESOURCES
POLITICS
STATE BANK
POVERTY REDUCTION
ADVISORY WORK
PARTICIPATION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
BANKS
SOCIAL FUNDS
TRANSPARENCY
GOVERNANCE REFORM
UNION
INCOME GROUP
REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS
NUTRITION
FISCAL DEFICIT
BORROWING
DEBT RELIEF
AGREEMENT
FINANCES
SUBSIDIARY
PARTNERSHIP
UNIVERSITY
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PER CAPITA INCOME
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
LIABILITIES
LOCAL LEVEL
MILITARY REGIME
SERVICE
INDEBTEDNESS
MUNICIPALITIES
CRITERIA
CITIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
GOVERNMENT
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
MEDIUM
STRATEGIES
LINES OF CREDIT
CORPORATION
DEBTS
EXPENDITURES
FINANCIAL CRISES
POLITICAL ECONOMY
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TRUST
ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION
STATES
FINANCE
LIMITED ACCESS
LOANS
PRIVATIZATION
LAW
NEW BUSINESSES
TRANSFERS
EXCHANGE RATE
PURCHASING POWER
BANK LOANS
DEVOLUTION
INEQUALITY
INTEREST
LICENSES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
GENDER
INFRASTRUCTURE
DEVELOPMENT BANK
REVENUE
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
SERVICE DELIVERY
STRATEGY
WOMEN
EXPENDITURE
GOVERNANCE
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
GRANT
DEFICITS
GRANTS
COLLECTIONS
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
LOAN
PARTNERSHIPS
INCOME
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
UNIONS
ADB
ORGANIZATION
CORRUPTION
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
EXTERNAL SHOCKS
SOVEREIGN GUARANTEES
FEE
FISCAL POLICY
CAPITAL
LIMITED
TAXES
DELTA
FISCAL DEFICITS
PRINCIPAL
WATER SUPPLY
STATE GOVERNMENTS
ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT
DIRECTORS
PUBLIC FINANCE
SOCIAL SERVICES
POLICIES
ASSOCIATION
PROJECTS
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
LENDING
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
REPORTS
INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
BANK
STATE GOVERNMENT
FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS
SPONSORS
FOREIGN CURRENCY
CREDIT
LENDING PORTFOLIO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2454Abstract
This report summarizes the past 10 years
 (1998-2008) of World Bank engagement at the state level in
 four selected large federal countries: Brazil, India,
 Nigeria, and the Russian Federation. The report identifies
 lessons and good practice examples that warrant further
 examination and wider dissemination. First, the study
 confirms the desirability of continued selective lending in
 a few focus states. The Bank's engagement with
 progressive, reformist states has added value and has been
 highly appreciated, but to enhance the poverty impact of
 state-level interventions, greater weight should be given to
 the needs of the poorest states by balancing states'
 propensity to reform and the concentration of poverty within
 them. Experience shows that it has been possible to achieve
 results in some of the poorer, low-capacity states through
 persistent work with committed state counterparts and
 partnerships with other donors. Second, continued focus on
 public finance management appears sound, irrespective of
 whether engagement is confined to this area or serves as an
 entry point for broader engagement. Third, there is
 considerable scope for greater impact from knowledge
 transfer and expanded knowledge services.Date
2012-03-19Type
Publications & Research :: PublicationIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2454http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2454
978-0-8213-8224-0
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Indonesia : Budget Reform Strategy PrioritiesAllen, R.; Kristensen, J.; Lienert, I.; Jacobs, D.; Schiavo-Campo, S.; Eckardt, S. (International Monetory Fund and the World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007-06)This report is designed to assist the
 authorities develop an overall road map for reforming budget
 preparation. A specific focus is on the steps to be taken to
 introduce a medium-term framework for the central
 government's budget and a performance-based budget.
 These reforms require important preconditions to be in
 place, and a substantial change in the culture, incentives
 and behavior of the public service, and are likely to take
 several years to complete. Successive Indonesian governments
 have embarked on various reforms in the budget and public
 financial management system. New laws for governing budget
 and planning processes were adopted during 2003-04, which
 are gradually being implemented. The national development
 planning agency (BAPPENAS) and spending ministries have
 developed strategic government and ministerial plans that
 provide a basis for elaborating the framework for
 performance measurement and evaluation. Reforms are thus
 starting from a secure base and can also take advantage of
 the improved and stable macroeconomic and fiscal conditions,
 including a low fiscal deficit and a declining government
 debt ratio.
-
Sudan : Public Expenditure Review, Synthesis ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-11)This synthesis provides a baseline assessment of two fundamental dimensions of public finance in post-CPA Sudan-fiscal management and the alignment of resources to broad-based growth and reduced poverty and inequality. This Public Expenditure Review (PER), the first for Sudan, reflects the initial phase of engagement, with the objective of identifying and supporting improvements in budget planning, monitoring and institutional arrangements so as to contribute to improved resource use and outcomes. The emphasis is on establishing a baseline understanding of key fiscal management and policy challenges, highlighting reform measures for policymakers, and setting the agenda for the next phase of work. This report begins with an introduction. The rest of the synthesis report is structured as follows. Sections 2 and 3 cover the Government of National Unity (GNU) revenue and expenditure management, respectively. Section 4 summarizes key aspects of the PER dialogue on identifying and monitoring pro-poor spending in Sudan. Intergovernmental transfers and fiscal decentralization are the focus of Section 5, and section 6 summarizes the main findings from the PER state case studies. Section 7 is dedicated to fiscal issues in the South.
-
Nigeria - A Fiscal Agenda for Change : Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review, Volume 2. Executive SummaryWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-11)This report reviews the trends in
 expenditure patterns in public financial management (PFM) in
 Nigeria since 2001, and assesses the impact thus far of the
 ongoing government reform efforts. The public expenditure
 management and financial accountability review (PEMFAR)
 covers areas that have been traditionally undertaken by
 separate Bank reports such as the public expenditure reviews
 (PER), the country financial accountability assessment
 (CFAA), and the country procurement assessment review
 (CPAR). This analysis covers fiscal policies and performance
 at both federal and state government levels. The PEMFAR is a
 consolidated diagnostic tool designed to enhance Bank,
 development partners' and member countries'
 knowledge of PFM arrangements and reform challenges. The
 core objective of the Nigeria PEMFAR is to advise the
 Government (federal and participating states) on how (i) to
 better focus and sequence its PFM, including the procurement
 reform agenda within a broader economic reform framework,
 and (ii) identify directions and instruments of
 restructuring its expenditure patterns on both macro and
 sectoral levels. The PEMFAR also aims to inform
 international development partners on how they could provide
 more efficient support for the PFM reforms in Nigeria by
 identifying the main bottlenecks within the existing reform process.