Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
ColombiaAt the request of the Colombian
 authorities, the bank resolution regime was assessed against
 the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for
 Financial Institutions (KAs). The assessment was conducted
 by staff of the Financial Stability Board (FSB),
 International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank utilizing
 the draft KA Assessment Methodology (AM). The assessment
 reviewed the resolution regime as of October 2015, and was
 limited to the banking sector, considering only those
 elements of the AM that directly relate to bank resolution
 without assessing those addressing the resolution of
 insurance firms, investment firms and financial market
 infrastructures (FMIs). As a draft methodology was used, the
 findings of the assessment should be viewed as preliminary.
 A central goal of this assessment was to test the draft AM,
 and a future revision of the AM might yield different
 results with respect to the adherence of the Colombian bank
 resolution regime to the KAs. In this light, no ratings were
 assigned in this review. This assessment was the first one
 undertaken in a country that is not a member of the FSB, or
 home to a Global Systemically Important Financial
 Institution (G-SIFI).
-
Colombia Detailed Assessment of ObservanceAt the request of the Colombian
 authorities, the bank resolution regime was assessed against
 the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for
 Financial Institutions (KAs). The assessment was conducted
 by staff of the Financial Stability Board (FSB),
 International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank utilizing
 the draft KA Assessment Methodology (AM). The assessment
 reviewed the resolution regime as of October 2015, and was
 limited to the banking sector, considering only those
 elements of the AM that directly relate to bank resolution
 without assessing those addressing the resolution of
 insurance firms, investment firms and financial market
 infrastructures (FMIs). As a draft methodology was used, the
 findings of the assessment should be viewed as preliminary.
 A central goal of this assessment was to test the draft AM,
 and a future revision of the AM might yield different
 results with respect to the adherence of the Colombian bank
 resolution regime to the KAs. In this light, no ratings were
 assigned in this review. This assessment was the first one
 undertaken in a country that is not a member of the FSB, or
 home to a Global Systemically Important Financial
 Institution (G-SIFI).
-
Doing Business 2011 : Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs - Comparing Business Regulation in 183 EconomiesDoing Business 2011: making a difference for entrepreneurs is the eighth in a series of annual reports investigating regulations that enhance business activity and those that constrain it. Doing Business presents quantitative indicators on business regulations and the protection of property rights that can be compared across 183 economies, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, over time. A set of regulations affecting 11 areas of the life of a business's are covered: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, registering property, getting credit, protecting investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and closing a business. Data in Doing Business 2011 are current as of June 1, 2010. The indicators are used to analyze economic outcomes and identify what reforms have worked, where, and why. The paper includes the following headings: overview, starting a business, dealing with construction permits, employing workers, registering property, getting credit, protecting investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts, and closing a business.