United Republic of Tanzania - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Review 2009
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURESPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
INTEREST PAYMENTS
EDUCATION SPENDING
BUDGET CREDIBILITY
FISCAL AFFAIRS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
POVERTY REDUCING
CAPITAL ACCOUNT
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
TAX REVENUE
CAPITATION GRANT
DOMESTIC TAX
SECTOR BUDGETS
FOREIGN FINANCING
INTERNAL CONTROLS
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
STATED OBJECTIVE
INTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT
CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
CAPITAL SPENDING
HEALTH SERVICES
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
OIL PRICES
PUBLIC MONEY
AUDIT OFFICE
AUDITOR GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
EXTERNAL FINANCING
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
TAX POLICY
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
REVENUE TARGET
OIL PRODUCTS
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
SOCIAL WELFARE
CAPACITY BUILDING
FOREIGN FUNDS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
PERSONNEL EXPENSES
BUDGET ESTIMATES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MACROECONOMIC CONDITIONS
NATIONAL STRATEGY
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
INTEREST PAYMENT
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES
NATURAL RESOURCES
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION
POVERTY REDUCTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
BUDGET DATA
TAX EXEMPTIONS
DEBT SERVICE
EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
NATIONAL AUDIT
ALLOCATION CHOICES
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
BUDGET DISCUSSIONS
HEALTH INSURANCE
EXCHANGE RATES
HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC ASSETS
BUDGETARY POLICIES
FISCAL DEFICIT
DEBT RELIEF
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
REAL EXCHANGE RATE
ACCOUNTING
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
REALLOCATIONS
FOREIGN RESERVE
DOMESTIC DEMAND
MACROECONOMIC MODEL
FINANCIAL CRISIS
DEBT MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL YEARS
PROGRAM BUDGETING
TAX ADMINISTRATION
DEBT SUSTAINABILITY
EXOGENOUS SHOCKS
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
INDEBTEDNESS
DOMESTIC BORROWING
PUBLIC SERVICES
MACRO INDICATORS
PUBLIC SECTOR
PERFORMANCE AUDITS
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS
CASH MANAGEMENT
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
SECTOR BUDGET
TAX COLLECTION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR CORRUPTION
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
SECTOR POLICIES
FOREIGN RESERVES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
EXTERNAL DEBT
HEALTH SECTOR
AUDITORS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
BUDGET PREPARATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES
MACROECONOMIC SITUATION
FOREIGN GRANTS
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
EXCHANGE RATE
DEBT DYNAMICS
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
HEALTH SPENDING
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
SERVICE LEVELS
PUBLIC DEBT
QUALITY ASSURANCE
SECTOR MINISTRIES
FISCAL YEARS
STRATEGIC PLANS
INCOME TAX
DOMESTIC REVENUE
ELECTRONIC FUNDS
SERVICE DELIVERY
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURE LEVEL
FISCAL POSITION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
SIZE OF GOVERNMENT
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
COMMERCIAL BANKS
GROWTH RATE
GENERAL BUDGET SUPPORT
BUDGET ALLOCATION
AGGREGATE SPENDING
BUDGET EXECUTION
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE DATA
SOCIAL BENEFIT
FISCAL POLICY
SOCIAL SERVICE
PUBLIC SECTOR DEBT
ACCOUNTANT
MACROECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
EQUIPMENT
BUDGET SUBMISSION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MONETARY FUND
INFLATION
INVESTMENT BANK
PUBLIC RESOURCES
STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION
SOCIAL SERVICES
DONOR FUNDS
QUALITY OF LIFE
MULTILATERAL DONORS
CASH FLOW
INTEREST RATE
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
RESOURCE ALLOCATION SYSTEM
MACROECONOMIC POLICY
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET STRUCTURE
RETURN
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
FISCAL PROJECTIONS
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
BUDGET DEFICIT
MAINTENANCE BUDGET
CIVIL SERVANTS
POVERTY REDUCTION OBJECTIVES
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2944Abstract
The budget analysis section constitutes
 the 'core analyses of the Public Expenditure and
 Financial Accountability Review (PEFAR) 2009 report. The
 rapid budget analysis 2009 and the budget execution analysis
 2009 are two key inputs into the report's core
 analysis. The report presents an overview of the main
 findings and key messages of the various sector and thematic
 reports carried out as part of the rapid budget analysis and
 budget execution analysis of the 2008-09 cycle. The analysis
 in this part of the report utilizes both budget estimates
 and actual expenditure data. The budget estimate data used
 are as originally approved by the Parliament, while the
 actual expenditure data used are as generated from the
 Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). The actual
 expenditure data are in some parts complemented by the data
 downloaded from the 'logintanzania' website,
 especially data for Local Government Authorities (LGAs). As
 much as possible, the analysis is cast from a medium term
 perspective, with both budget estimates and actual spending
 data giving a three year trend or more in order to make some
 meaningful comparison. The last stage of the analysis in
 this part addresses the question of whether actual
 expenditures in 2008-09 were consistent with the original
 approved budget. It also examines the question of whether
 the budget achieves its stated impact on the ground, in
 terms of providing effective public services to the
 population in an equitable and efficient manner. In
 particular, the analysis of the execution of the budget in
 2008-09, with a particular focus on the Ministries,
 Departments and Agency (MDA) development budget, is
 presented in this part. The analysis in this section
 continues by shedding some light on value audits conducted
 by the National Audit Office (NAO) in two key sectors,
 education and health.Date
2012-03-19Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure ReviewIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2944http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2944
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
Liberia - 2008 Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability ReviewWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The 2008 Public Expenditure Management
 and Financial Accountability Review (PEMFAR) assess
 Liberia's public expenditure performance along four
 main dimensions: macroeconomic, institutional, allocations
 between sectors, and allocations within key sectors. At the
 macroeconomic level, it describes the external economic
 constraints and opportunities that will drive growth and
 revenue mobilization over the medium term and determine the
 likely fiscal envelope (chapter one). It next reviews the
 institutional structures that guide and ensure appropriate
 resource allocation and assesses the strength and weaknesses
 of the current systems using a standardized public
 expenditure and financial accountability scoring system
 (chapter two). It then assesses how public expenditure has
 been allocated between sectors and priorities (chapter
 three). It lastly reviews the allocation of resources within
 two priority sectors, health and education (chapter four).
-
United Republic of Tanzania Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Review 2008World Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-08-14)Rising inflation represents a serious
 challenge for the government, including fiscal policy. By
 December 2008, inflation has risen to 13.5 percent, far
 above the government target of five percent since 2004. It
 is important the government continue its effort to reduce
 inflation through monetary and fiscal policies, including
 reducing inflationary pressures on the budget by controlling
 wage bill growth in line with medium-term pay policy. The
 2008-09 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) projected
 optimistic targets for domestic revenue and, at a same time,
 pessimistic targets for foreign aid. Although domestic
 revenue has been rising over the recent past, the targeted
 18.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in revenue
 effort is high given the fact that revenue has increased by
 only one percent of GDP annually in the past five years. It
 is important to improve reliability of the macro-framework
 by sustaining efforts to develop capacity in macro-fiscal
 policy and macro-modeling, which is an important tool for
 the government to properly assess expected levels of
 domestic revenue collection over the medium term. Although
 some major achievements have been obtained in capacity
 building program, priority areas for intervention have also
 been identified for 2009. These areas are: (i) strengthening
 of macroeconomic model (MACMOD) and the macro policy
 framework paper, taking into account the world economic
 crisis as well as new data developments in Tanzania; (ii)
 initiating MTEF upgrades (both central and sector) as well
 as program budgeting starting with the ministry of health
 and social welfare; and (iii) preparing the second edition
 of the budget background and medium term framework for
 2009/10 - 2011/12.