Author(s)
World BankKeywords
MEDIUM-TERM FISCAL FRAMEWORKECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION
TAX PAYERS
ECONOMIC POLICY
DISTRICT COUNCILS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
CENTRAL BANK
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL SPACE
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX REVENUE
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
REFORM STRATEGY
INTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT
PROGRAM STRUCTURE
REVENUE SOURCES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
REVENUE COLLECTION
BUDGET MANAGERS
SUBNATIONAL
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
ALLOCATION
PROGRAM EXPENDITURE
AUDITOR GENERAL
TAX BASE
TAX
TAX POLICY
EFFICIENT USE
NATIONAL BUDGET
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PROGRAMS
TAX POLICIES
CAPACITY BUILDING
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
SECTOR PROGRAMS
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ANNUAL REPORT
FIDUCIARY ASSESSMENT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ANNUAL BUDGET
LOCAL REVENUE
REFORM OBJECTIVES
NATIONAL STRATEGY
APPROPRIATION
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
POLICY DECISIONS
DECISION-MAKING
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
DECISION-MAKERS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
MASTER PLAN
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE PLAN
PRIVATE SECTOR
TRANSPARENCY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REFORM
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
GOVERNMENT POLICY
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
REFORM PROGRAM
BUDGETARY IMPACT
DISCRETIONARY REVENUES
MEDIUM-TERM PLAN
NATIONAL SECURITY
PETTY CORRUPTION
DISTRICT
TAX REVENUES
AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
ACCOUNTING
DONOR FINANCING
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
TAX EXPENDITURES
REVENUE AUTHORITY
DEBT MANAGEMENT
TAX ADMINISTRATION
DEBT SUSTAINABILITY
OUTCOME INDICATORS
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
DECENTRALIZATION STRATEGY
CIVIL SERVICE REFORMS
FISCAL TRANSFERS
DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
DISTRICT LEVEL
INTERNAL CONTROL
PUBLIC SECTOR
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS
CASH MANAGEMENT
POLICY PRIORITIES
TAX SYSTEM
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
TAX COLLECTION
CAPACITY-BUILDING
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET
FORWARD ESTIMATES
EXTERNAL AUDIT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
SUB-NATIONAL
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION
EXPENDITURES
POLICY FORMULATION
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
EXTERNAL DEBT
GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION
CASH BASIS
EXTERNAL AUDITS
TAX SYSTEMS
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
AUDITORS
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
FIDUCIARY RISK
BUDGET SYSTEM
BUDGET PREPARATION
PUBLIC PROVISION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL REVENUE MOBILIZATION
FINANCIAL REPORTS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMMING
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
FOREIGN GRANTS
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGET ACCOUNTS
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
FISCAL CAPACITY
STATE BUDGET
FISCAL RISK
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
TAXPAYERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
PUBLIC DEBT
TAX COLLECTIONS
BUDGET FORMULATION
OUTCOME TARGETS
STRATEGIC PLANS
DOMESTIC REVENUE
BUDGET OUTTURNS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
PUBLIC ENTITIES
SERVICE DELIVERY
ANALYSIS OF TRENDS
POVERTY REDUCTION SUPPORT
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
PUBLIC FUNDS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
COMMERCIAL BANKS
GROWTH RATE
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
BUDGET EXECUTION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
TAX REFORMS
ARTICLE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BUDGET CYCLE
MEDIUM-TERM FISCAL
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
DISTRICTS
INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
BUDGET INFORMATION
PUBLIC FINANCE
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
TREASURY MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM RESULTS
EXPENDITURE PROGRAM
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET STRUCTURE
DECENTRALIZATION PROGRAM
CIVIL SERVANTS
POLICY ANALYSIS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20761Abstract
The Public Financial Management (PFM)
 Sector Strategic Plan (SSP) identifies key challenges and
 proposes solutions in each program that are translated into
 a foundation for defining sector priorities and outcomes
 through FY2017-18. Improving coherence between national
 strategies, the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF),
 and the annual budget process has been identified as an area
 for improvement under the first program, on economic
 planning and budgeting. In the second program, on resource
 mobilization, key challenges are inadequate resource
 mobilization, resulting in aid dependency at the national
 level and lack of discretionary revenues at the subnational
 level. Across the PFM sector, particularly under program 7,
 on PFM sector and coordination, capacity and skill shortages
 are identified as key bottlenecks. Capacity and skill
 shortages are more pronounced at the subnational level,
 especially on core PFM areas such as accounting, auditing,
 budgeting, and reporting. NISR made significant progress in
 the quality, timeliness, and dissemination of data, mainly
 in the social and demographic domain, under the first
 National Strategy for Development of Statistics, or NSDS
 (2009-14). The overarching objectives of NSDS 2 are to
 produce relevant, reliable, and timely statistics to monitor
 the progress of EDPRS 2 and to strengthen the NSS.Date
2014-09-14Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Financial Accountability StudyIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/20761http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20761
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Indonesia : Budget Reform Strategy PrioritiesAllen, R.; Kristensen, J.; Lienert, I.; Jacobs, D.; Schiavo-Campo, S.; Eckardt, S. (International Monetory Fund and the World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007-06)This report is designed to assist the
 authorities develop an overall road map for reforming budget
 preparation. A specific focus is on the steps to be taken to
 introduce a medium-term framework for the central
 government's budget and a performance-based budget.
 These reforms require important preconditions to be in
 place, and a substantial change in the culture, incentives
 and behavior of the public service, and are likely to take
 several years to complete. Successive Indonesian governments
 have embarked on various reforms in the budget and public
 financial management system. New laws for governing budget
 and planning processes were adopted during 2003-04, which
 are gradually being implemented. The national development
 planning agency (BAPPENAS) and spending ministries have
 developed strategic government and ministerial plans that
 provide a basis for elaborating the framework for
 performance measurement and evaluation. Reforms are thus
 starting from a secure base and can also take advantage of
 the improved and stable macroeconomic and fiscal conditions,
 including a low fiscal deficit and a declining government
 debt ratio.
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.
-
Strengthening Institutions for the Preparation of Government BudgetsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2011-02)The Government of Zimbabwe (GOZ) faces
 difficult choices in managing the size of its civil service
 wage bill. The Government understands the need to watch the
 escalating wage bill carefully and put in place a strategy
 to steer it to a sustainable level as early as possible.
 Historical and international comparisons suggest that an
 overall wage bill of around 10 percent of GDP should be the
 medium-term target. This note illustrates that Zimbabwe
 could take immediate steps in 2010 and 2011 that will put it
 on the path of a sustainable level of wage bill in the
 medium-term. The focus of efforts to contain the wage bill
 should be on short-term measures because designing and
 implementing a medium-term approach to wage bill management
 would be too challenging in view of prevailing economic
 uncertainty and complex political reality. The note covers
 the staff employed by the Central Government, including
 uniformed services and staff employed by the Grant-in-Aided
 (GIA) institutions. The staff employed by local governments
 and public enterprises are excluded because direct transfers
 from the central budget to local government and public
 enterprises are rather small. (annex A has an outline of the
 institutional aspects of civil service in Zimbabwe). Given
 the paucity of information, the note does not make any
 recommendations specific to the GIA wage bill.