Georgia Public Expenditure Review : Diagnostics of Public Investment Management System
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
CAPITAL COSTSCAPITAL PROJECTS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS
BENEFICIARY
ROAD NETWORK
BUDGETARY PROCESS
INVESTMENT PROCEDURES
EXPENDITURE POLICY
ANNUAL BUDGET PREPARATION
INVESTMENT PLANS
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FOREIGN FINANCING
INTERNAL CONTROLS
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
INTERNAL AUDIT
CAPITAL BUDGET
PUBLIC FINANCES
INFORMAL PROCEDURES
VALUATION
TENDERING
CAPITAL SPENDING
NATIONAL INVESTMENT
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
ALLOCATION
PUBLIC MONEY
CASH FLOWS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
EXTERNAL FINANCING
TAX
SERVICE PROVIDERS
UNCERTAINTY
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
CAPITAL BUDGETING
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
CORRECTIVE ACTION
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
BUDGET DEPARTMENT
BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS
EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
BUDGET LAW
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DUTCH AUCTION
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
ANNUAL REPORT
ANALYTICAL SKILLS
BUDGET ENTITY
RESERVE
BUDGET ESTIMATES
ANNUAL BUDGET
HOUSING
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
MONETARY VALUES
CASH PLANNING
NATIONAL STRATEGY
ROAD TRAFFIC
APPROPRIATION
ANNUAL BUDGETS
DECISION-MAKING
PORTFOLIO
SANITATION
INVESTMENT BUDGETING
PUBLIC CAPITAL
SOCIAL BENEFITS
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
DECISION-MAKERS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
BID
BIDS
PRIVATE SECTOR
ASSET MANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
TRANSPARENCY
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
POSSESSION
INVESTMENT NEEDS
REFORM EFFORTS
CAPITAL TRANSFERS
PROCUREMENT PLANS
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TURNOVER
SECTOR EXPENDITURE
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ACCOUNTING
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
RETURNS
FINANCE MINISTRY
FINANCIAL CRISIS
STATEMENT
PROGRAM BUDGETING
DEGREE OF TRANSPARENCY
ANALYSIS OF SERVICE DELIVERY
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
BIDDERS
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
INVESTMENT BUDGETS
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
CITIES
TENDERS
INSTRUMENT
INTERNAL CONTROL
PUBLIC SECTOR
PERFORMANCE AUDITS
CASH MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL ASSETS
INVESTMENT PROGRAM
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
DISBURSEMENTS
OPPORTUNITIES FOR CORRUPTION
NATIONAL POLICY
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
EXPENDITURES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL PLANS
EXPENDITURE PLANNING
BENEFICIARIES
INVESTMENT PRIORITIES
BALANCE SHEET
AUDITORS
BUDGET YEAR
FINANCIAL REGULARITY
DWELLINGS
BUDGET PREPARATION
URBAN AREAS
CASH INFLOW
BUDGET CODE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS
EX POST EVALUATIONS
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
SELF-ASSESSMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
DISCOUNT RATE
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
COST ESTIMATES
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
TREASURY SYSTEM
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
STATE BUDGET
CHECKS
BUDGET DECISIONS
INVESTING
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
INVESTMENT PLANNING
INTERNAL AUDITS
QUALITY ASSURANCE
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
CENTRAL AGENCIES
SERVICE DELIVERY
WRITTEN RECORDS
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
COST OF SERVICES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
EXPENDITURE PRIORITIES
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
TREASURY
BANK POLICY
LIABILITY
PUBLIC FINANCIAL RESOURCES
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS
CAPITAL ASSETS
PROCUREMENT POLICIES
BUDGET ALLOCATION
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET PLANNING
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT
ARTICLE
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
EQUIPMENT
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
WELFARE STATE
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
EXPENDITURE IMPLICATIONS
FINANCIAL CONTROL
INVESTMENT PROJECTS
RECURRENT COST
CASH FLOW
STREET LIGHTING
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
INTERNAL AUDIT FINDINGS
RESERVE FUNDS
CREDIBILITY
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19302Abstract
Generating growth and creating jobs
 within a sustainable fiscal framework is Georgia s biggest
 macroeconomic challenge. Although Georgia registered rapid
 growth of 5.7 percent a year during 2010-13, unemployment
 remains high at 15 percent. New growth companies, especially
 in tourism and other service sectors, did not generate
 enough formal or even informal employment. Fiscal policy
 played a crucial role in Georgia s recent growth performance
 with a fiscal stimulus driven post-crisis recovery which
 increased deficit and debt levels followed by fiscal
 consolidation during 2010-12 when recovery took hold. The
 weak execution of the budget in 2013 and policy uncertainty
 were largely responsible for the growth slowdown during the
 year. Tackling the growth and jobs agenda in Georgia will
 require significant investment in human and physical capital
 and the government has a large role to play here. Additional
 spending, where it is needed, should be undertaken within
 the fiscal consolidation agenda of the government, designed
 to help restore the macroeconomic buffers needed to secure
 stability and sustain confidence in the future. The change
 in government in 2012 marked a shift in fiscal policy with
 prioritization of recurrent social expenditures over capital
 spending, thereby, increasing budget rigidity. During
 2012-13, the government raised the benefit levels under the
 targeted social assistance (TSA) and pensions and introduced
 universal health care (UHC). As a result, the fiscal deficit
 is likely to increase from 2.6 percent of gross domestic
 product (GDP) in 2013 to 3.7 percent in 2014. Over the
 medium term, an aging population and the need to improve
 health outcomes and coverage of the poor in social
 assistance programs will keep social expenditures high at
 more than 9 percent of GDP. The share of capital
 expenditures will level off, meanwhile. Such an outcome will
 reduce the government s flexibility in trimming current
 expenditures in the future.Date
2014-08-14Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/19302http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19302
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kyrgyz Republic Public Expenditure Review Policy Notes : Public Investment ManagementWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-05)Weaknesses in the public investment
 management (PIM) system may limit the gains from higher
 public sector investments in the Kyrgyz Republic. Capital
 spending has averaged 6.4 percent of GDP since 2010, up from
 4.6 percent of GDP between 2005 and 2009, with significant
 investment in the energy sector and roads. Still, it remains
 unclear to what extent these investment decisions reflect
 the country's and sector priorities. Few projects,
 with the exception of donor-financed projects are subject to
 rigorous appraisal and there is no systematic procedure in
 place to monitor implementation progress. As a result,
 projects are often delayed or stalled and cost over-runs are
 frequent. Donor-financed projects, which comprise the bulk
 of public investment, are subject to relatively more
 rigorous project cycle management; however, they too face
 some of the same weaknesses. The rest of the note is
 structured as follows: section two provides a diagnosis of
 the public investment portfolio, including the structure of
 expenditures, the quality of the data, and a quantitative
 assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of the public
 investment portfolio. The assessment builds on previous work
 on public investment in the Kyrgyz Republic, in particular
 the Public Investment Diagnostic undertaken in 2012 under
 the Capacity Building in Economic Management (CBEM) project.
 Section three reviews the institutional and administrative
 framework of PIM in Kyrgyz Republic. This draws largely
 from the draft Investment Diagnostic Report prepared in
 December 2012 using the eight key 'must-have'
 features of a well-functioning public investments framework
 proposed in Rajaram et.al. (2011). Finally, section four
 includes a summary of the findings and detailed
 recommendations on improving PIM.
-
Western Balkans - Public Investment Management Study : Main ReportWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This report summarizes the findings of a
 review of public investment management (PIM) practices in
 the Western Balkans carried out with an eye to improving
 practices over the medium term, sharing experiences on a
 regional basis, providing some initial specific
 recommendations and identifying areas for more intensive
 further analysis. Following this introduction, the second
 section of the main report examines capital expenditure
 trends in the study countries. The third section provides an
 overview of the findings across the six countries. The
 fourth section provides potential drill-down topics for the
 further analysis. The fifth and final section briefly
 outlines the methodology used in the individual country
 studies. The study has revealed frequent weaknesses in the
 institutional arrangements for public investment management,
 although in most cases things are moving in the right
 direction. Box one set out some stylized guidelines on good
 practice for institutional arrangements for public
 investment management, based on what is commonly found in
 OECD countries. The box describes systems involving a
 single, integrated budgeting process for capital and
 recurrent expenditure, within which capital expenditure is
 clearly distinguished from current expenditure because of
 its particular characteristics.
-
Iraq Public Expenditure and Institutional Assessment, Volume 1World Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)The public expenditure and institutional
 assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors.
 First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its
 international development partners have recognized the
 critical importance of sound management of Iraq's
 substantial public financial resources. Both parties support
 the reform and modernization of public financial management
 (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq
 (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the
 importance of establishing a baseline against which progress
 in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for
 an assessment which provides the information necessary to
 measure the performance of a country's PFM system.
 Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the
 past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for
 PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can
 help to shape and prioritize the necessary development
 program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume
 one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA)
 assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM
 issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital
 investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq
 financial management information system (IFMIS), public
 accounting and accountability, and payroll management.
 Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the
 PEFA assessment.