Author(s)
World Bank GroupGovernment of Pakistan
European Union
Asian Development Bank
U.K. Department for International Development
Keywords
CASH RATIONINGPROVINCIAL LEVEL
ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
EXPENDITURE COMMITMENTS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
DISTRIBUTION OF REVENUES
EXPENDITURE POLICY
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT
TYPES OF ENTITIES
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
TAX REVENUE
INTERNAL CONTROLS
REFORM STRATEGY
SMALL DEFICITS
INTERNAL AUDIT
FISCAL INFORMATION
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
FISCAL BALANCE
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TAX PAYMENTS
PUBLIC FINANCES
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
NATIONAL INCOME
OIL PRICES
AUDIT OFFICE
AUDITOR GENERAL
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
EXPENDITURE CONTROLS
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS
SOCIAL WELFARE
REFORM PROCESS
PROGRAMS
REVENUE FORECASTING
BUDGET LAW
SELF ASSESSMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
SERVICE CHARGES
INFLATION RATES
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS
BUDGET ESTIMATES
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL STATISTICS
APPROPRIATION
DOMESTIC INVESTMENT
DECISION-MAKING
SANITATION
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
BUDGET SUBMISSIONS
COMMODITY PRICES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
BUDGET PROPOSAL
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
DEBT SERVICE
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
ECONOMIC INSTABILITY
TRANSPARENCY
GOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
FISCAL DEFICIT
GOVERNMENT POLICY
REFORM PROGRAM
EXTRA BUDGETARY FUNDS
EXPENDITURE OBLIGATIONS
BUDGET STRATEGY
GENERAL ACCOUNTS
DEBT MANAGEMENT
SALES TAX
FINANCIAL YEARS
QUALITY SERVICE
FISCAL POLICIES
TAX ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SERVICES
BUDGET PROPOSALS
INTERNAL CONTROL
PUBLIC SECTOR
CASH MANAGEMENT
TAX SYSTEM
FINANCIAL ASSETS
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
FEDERAL BUDGET
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
OPPORTUNITIES FOR CORRUPTION
CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURES
GROSS PUBLIC DEBT
POLICY FORMULATION
EXTERNAL DEBT
NATIONAL PRIORITY
CASH BASIS
NATIONAL BANK
OPERATING EXPENSES
REVENUE FORECAST
FIDUCIARY RISK
APPROPRIATIONS
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
BUDGET PREPARATION
BLOCK GRANTS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCIAL REPORTS
PUBLIC SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE
SOCIAL SECURITY
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
FISCAL FORECASTS
EXCHANGE RATE
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
CREDIBLE BUDGET
FISCAL RISK
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
DELIVERY OF SERVICES
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
TAX COLLECTIONS
DEBT POLICY
BUDGET FORMULATION
ECONOMIC DOWNTURN
PRICE INDEX
FISCAL YEARS
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
INCOME TAX
DOMESTIC REVENUE
SERVICE DELIVERY
COMMUNITY SERVICES
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
SECTORAL ALLOCATIONS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PUBLIC FUNDS
MINISTERS OF FINANCE
POSITIVE IMPACTS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
GROWTH RATE
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
BUDGET ALLOCATION
BUDGET EXECUTION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL OPERATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION
ARTICLE
AGGREGATE FISCAL
DEBT SERVICING
CASH BALANCES
BUDGETARY OUTCOMES
BUDGET SUPPORT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BUDGET CYCLE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
FISCAL DEFICITS
BUDGET REALLOCATIONS
INFLATION
PUBLIC RESOURCES
BUDGET INFORMATION
DEFICIT FINANCING
SOCIAL SERVICES
PUBLIC FINANCE
DONOR FUNDS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE
SECTORAL OBJECTIVES
AGGREGATE REVENUE
FISCAL REPORTING
REFORM PROJECT
MILITARY EXPENDITURES
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET STATEMENT
AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE
FISCAL PROJECTIONS
STRATEGIC POLICY
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
FOREIGN CURRENCY
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26816Abstract
This document reports on a Public
 Financial Management and Accountability Assessment (PFMAA)
 for the Federal Government of Pakistan (GoP). Measured
 against the six core Public Financial Management (PFM)
 objectives examined by the assessment, the assessment
 indicates that there have been improvements in some areas in
 recent years, which have served to improve general public
 financial management. The last PEFAA for the Federal
 Government was published in June 2009. Overall, the maximum
 number of indicators remained unchanged. As PFM concerns the
 efficiency and effectiveness of the use of public resources,
 the interdependence of the components of the budget cycle
 means that weaknesses in one part can adversely affect other
 parts thereby constraining the achievement of better
 budgetary outcomes; conversely, improvements in one area
 which are not matched by corresponding changes in other
 areas can undermine the initial reforms. The strengths and
 weaknesses of Pakistan's public financial management
 system found in the assessment have an impact on the three
 measures of budget effectiveness-aggregate fiscal
 discipline, allocates efficiency and efficient service
 delivery. The GoP has a continuing agenda of PFM reform.
 Current programs are focused on areas of weaknesses in PFM
 administration that have been identified by the GoP and
 development partners. Pakistan's prospects for reform
 implementation should be regarded as positive considering
 the impact of the reform programs so far which have made
 visible contributions in improving budgeting, reporting and
 external audit. The PEFA framework focuses on operational
 performance of the key elements of the PFM system based on
 evidence rather than on the inputs that enable the PFM
 system to reach a certain level of performance. The PFMAA
 assesses the extent to which the PFM system is an enabling
 factor for achieving budgetary outcomes at the three levels
 of aggregate fiscal discipline, strategic allocation of
 resources and efficient service delivery.Date
2017-05-31Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/26816http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26816
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Colombia - National Level Public Financial Management and Procurement Report : Public Financial Management PerformanceInter-American Development Bank; World Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This Public Financial Management
 Performance Report (PFMPR) analyzes the performance of
 Colombia's public financial management (PFM)
 institutions, systems and processes. It documents areas
 where performance is close to or follows international good
 practice, as well as opportunities to further enhance PFM
 contribution to the goals of strengthening fiscal
 discipline, enabling more efficient allocation of resources,
 increasing operational efficiency, and fostering
 transparency. It is expected that the identified
 opportunities will strengthen further the Government of
 Colombia's programs of continuous PFM improvement, as
 provided for under the National Development Plan pillar
 regarding a state at the service of its citizens: efficient
 and effective Government. The main challenges cited in the
 report could also be an important reference to future
 development plans and PFM reforms. Ensuring the
 sustainability and trajectory of PFM programs becomes even
 more critical in the context of public expenditure policies
 to deal with the current international economic crisis. The
 study is based on the 28 high-level indicators and 69
 individual dimensions that compose the PFM performance
 measurement framework. Each indicator seeks to measure
 performance of a key PFM element against a scale from A to
 D. The highest score is warranted for an individual
 indicator if the core PFM element meets the relevant
 objective in a complete, orderly, accurate, timely and
 coordinated way, based on existing good international practices.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.