Decentralization and the Provision of Public Services : Framework and Implementation
Author(s)
Kim, AehyungKeywords
FINANCIAL TRANSFERSACCOUNTABILITY
MATCHING GRANTS
PERSONAL INCOME
INTERNATIONAL BANK
SOURCES OF REVENUE
SURCHARGES
FEDERAL SYSTEM
GOVERNMENT FAILURE
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
TAX REVENUE
LOCAL GOODS
MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION
PROPERTY TAXATION
MARKET CONDITIONS
POLITICAL STABILITY
FISCAL FEDERALISM
METROPOLITAN CITIES
REVENUE SOURCES
LOCAL EXPENDITURES
FISCAL BALANCE
TAX PAYMENTS
LOCAL RESIDENTS
FISCAL SYSTEMS
PUBLIC ECONOMICS
CENTRAL AUTHORITY
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL TRANSFERS
PUBLIC SERVICE PROVISION
HEALTH SERVICES
FEDERALISM PERSPECTIVE
METROPOLITAN AREAS
STABILIZATION FUNCTION
CAPITA INCOME
TRANSFER OF RESOURCES
LOCAL OFFICIALS
ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
TAX BASE
TAX
EXCISE TAXES
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINT
TRANSITION COUNTRIES
PAYROLL TAXES
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
PUBLIC
SOCIAL WELFARE
SOCIAL EXPENDITURES
ASSIGNMENT OF TAXES
CAPACITY BUILDING
REVENUE RESPONSIBILITIES
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
ASSIGNMENT OF EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
MARKET FAILURES
PROVISIONS
EXPENDITURE DECISIONS
FEDERAL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
PRIVATE SECTOR
EQUALIZATION
TRANSPARENCY
LEGISLATION
PERSONAL INCOME TAXES
AUTONOMY
REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
LOCAL PROPERTY TAX
FISCAL SOVEREIGNTY
LEVY
PUBLIC GOODS
ALLOCATION FUNCTION
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
CENTRAL CONTROL
HUMAN RESOURCES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL GRANTS
REGIONAL EXCISES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER SYSTEM
FINANCES
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
ECONOMIC STABILITY
LOCAL ELECTIONS
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
SALES TAX
TAX ADMINISTRATION
HUMAN CAPITAL
INDEBTEDNESS
HORIZONTAL EQUITY
HARD BUDGET
PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL TRANSFERS
PROPERTY TAX
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
DECONCENTRATION
PUBLIC SECTOR
VALUE ADDED TAXES
RETAIL SALES TAXES
TAX COLLECTION
FISCAL EFFORT
TAX FIELD
ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
FISCAL ACTIVITIES
POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES
BENEFICIARIES
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER
FISCAL FLOWS
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
PROPERTY TAXES
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMPETITION
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
SUBSIDIARITY PRINCIPLE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC SERVICE
LOCAL TAX
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
GARBAGE COLLECTION
FISCAL CAPACITY
FISCAL AUTONOMY
CHECKS
LOCAL PROVISION
REVENUE SHARING
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
EMPLOYMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
DEVOLUTION
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
TAXING POWERS
INCOME LEVEL
TAX SHARING
POLITICAL POWER
DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
TAXATION
TAX BASES
POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION
INCOME TAX
INCOME TAXES
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL CAPACITY
TAX REGIMES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
ENFORCEABILITY
REGIONAL DISPARITIES
HEALTH EXPENDITURES
LOCAL TAXES
BUSINESS TAXES
FEDERAL STRUCTURE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
DEFICITS
PUBLIC POLICY
REVENUE AUTONOMY
REVENUE ASSIGNMENT
ELASTIC REVENUE
LOCAL EXPENDITURE
MARKET MECHANISM
FISCAL SYSTEM
MACROECONOMIC INSTABILITY
FISCAL POLICY
TAX RATE
FIXED FRACTIONS OF REVENUES
NATIONAL TAXES
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FRAMEWORK
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MONETARY FUND
ROADS
LOCAL PUBLIC GOODS
GRANT PROGRAMS
PUBLIC FINANCE
EXTERNALITIES
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
PRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT
BENEFIT-RELATED TAXES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
FISCAL EQUIVALENCE
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITIES
TAX RATES
LOCAL ELITES
BENEFIT TAXATION
BUDGET DEFICIT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
USER CHARGES
DECENTRALIZATION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6708Abstract
This paper discusses decentralization
 (administrative, fiscal and political) of government in
 public service provision. It aims to facilitate
 understanding among practitioners, policy makers, and
 scholars about what decentralization entails in practice
 compared to theory. A review of the empirical literature
 and experience of decentralization is presented. The paper
 highlights issues that policy makers in developing and
 transitional countries should be aware of when reforming
 government, considering their unique political and economic
 environment. The author argues that decentralization
 produces efficiency gains stemming from inter-jurisdictional
 competition, enhanced checks and balances over the
 government through voting at the subnational level, and
 informational advantages due to proximity to citizens. By
 contrast, arguments against decentralization include the
 risk of an increased level of corruption, coordination
 problems stemming from multiple layers of government, low
 capacity of subnational government, and unproductive
 inter-jurisdictional competition. Decentralization itself
 does not render increased government effectiveness in public
 service provision. Instead, the effectiveness of government
 largely depends on the quality of human capital and institutions.Date
2012-05-30Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/6708http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6708
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Intergovernmental Reforms in the
 Russian Federation : One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?Golovanova, Natalia; Kurlyandskaya, Galina; De Silva, Migara O.; Andreeva, Elena (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009)Intergovernmental reforms in the Russian
 Federation: one step forward, two steps back? Is a critical
 analysis of Russia's intergovernmental reform program
 which began in the early 1990s. It assesses the effects of a
 broad range of reforms adopted over two tumultuous decades
 during which the Russian Federation experienced significant,
 and at times drastic, political regime changes, coupled with
 a similarly turbulent economic growth trajectory. This
 environment reshaped intergovernmental relations, requiring
 certain fiscal responsibilities to be delegated to the
 sub-national levels. These reforms, however, were not always
 accompanied by the kinds of administrative and political
 structures required to support a truly devolved system of
 intergovernmental fiscal relations. As this study indicates,
 in recent years there has been a tendency to recentralize
 some powers that had been granted to sub-national
 governments under earlier reforms, a trend that may call
 into question the future of fiscal decentralization in the
 federation. Moreover, the current global economic downturn
 has had a significant effect on Russia' economic
 growth, largely because of the country's overdependence
 on oil, gas, and mineral exports. It is likely that in the
 present economic climate the political regime will be
 inclined to further limit sub-national autonomy.
-
Autonomy with Equity and Accountability : Toward a More Transparent, Objective, Predictable and Simpler (TOPS) System of Central Financing of Provincial-Local Expenditures in IndonesiaShah, Anwar (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-29)During the past decade, Indonesia has
 transformed itself from centralized governance to
 decentralized local governance. Local governments were given
 extensive expenditure responsibilities while keeping the tax
 system centralized. To finance decentralized
 provincial-local expenditures, Indonesia implemented a new
 system of intergovernmental finance. This paper provides a
 review of the equity and efficiency implications of the
 current system of central-provincial-local transfers. It
 finds that the system of intergovernmental finance
 represents one of the most complex systems ever implemented
 by any government in the world. The system is primarily
 focused on a gap-filling approach to provincial-local
 finance to ensure revenue adequacy and local autonomy but
 without accountability to local residents for service
 delivery performance. This is done through a great degree of
 academic rigor using highly complex procedures. The
 complexity leads to a lack of transparency, inequity and
 uncertainty in allocation as well as creating incentives for
 jurisdictional fragmentation and reducing own-tax effort.
 Simpler alternatives are available that have the potential
 to address equity objectives while also enhancing efficiency
 and citizen-based accountability. Such alternatives would
 represent a move away from complex gap filling and special
 allocation approaches to simple, output based transfers to
 finance operating expenditures. These would be complemented
 by capital grants to deal with infrastructure deficiencies,
 and fiscal capacity equalization as a residual program with
 an explicit standard to ensure that all local jurisdictions
 have adequate means to deliver reasonably comparable levels
 of public services at reasonably comparable levels of tax
 burdens across the country. The paper argues that such an
 alternative system of intergoveernmental finance would
 preserve autonomy, while enhancing equity, simplicity,
 objectivity, transparency and accountability.
-
General Purpose Central-provincial-local Transfers (DAU) in Indonesia : From Gap Filling to Ensuring Fair Access to Essential Public Services for AllQibthiyyah, Riatu; Shah, Anwar; Dita, Astrid (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-06-29)Indonesia has come a long way from centralized governance to decentralized local governance, and today Indonesia ranks among the most decentralized developing countries. The Government of Indonesia is revisiting all aspects of local governance to make appropriate legal and institutional adjustments based on lessons leaarned during the past decade. An important area of this re-examination and possible reform is the central financing of subnational expenditures. The system of intergovernmental finance represents one of the most complex systems ever implemented by any government in the world. The system is primarily focused on a gap-filling approach to provincial-local finance in an objective manner to ensure revenue adequacy and local autonomy but without accountability to local residents for service delivery performance. This paper takes a closer look at Dana Alokasi Umum -- the most dominant program of unconditional central transfers to finance provincial-local government expenditures in Indonesia. The paper also presents illustrative simulations of alternative programs and compares these with the existing Dana Alokasi Umum allocations. The paper concludes that super complexity leads to lack of transparency, inequity, and uncertainty in allocation. Simpler alternatives are available that have the potential to address autonomy and equity objectives while also enhancing efficiency and citizen-based accountability. Such alternatives would represent a move away from the complex gap-filling approach to simple output-based transfers to finance operating expenditures. Capital grants would deal with infrastructure deficiencies. And the alternatives would institute fiscal capacity equalization as a residual program with an explicit standard to ensure that all local jurisdictions have adequate means to deliver reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of tax burdens across the country.