Author(s)
Servén, LuisKeywords
LIQUIDITYDERIVATIVE
PUBLIC REVENUES
USER FEES
ECONOMIC POLICY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
INTEREST PAYMENTS
CAPITAL STOCKS
PUBLIC SECTOR BORROWING
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
INTERNATIONAL BANK
LONG-RUN DEBT
DISCOUNT RATES
TAX REVENUE
CASH BALANCE
PUBLIC DEBT STOCK
FINANCIAL RATE OF RETURN
FISCAL ACCOUNTS
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEBT
MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
TYPES OF EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC FINANCES
FISCAL STRATEGIES
ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES
PUBLIC ECONOMICS
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
CAPITAL SPENDING
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
GROSS DEBT
CASH FLOWS
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT EXPENDITURE
TAX BASE
TAX
TAX POLICY
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
TRANSACTION
OPERATING COSTS
OUTPUT RATIO
UNCERTAINTY
MARKET PRICE
DEBT ACCUMULATION
INVESTMENT RISK
FISCAL REVENUE
RATES OF RETURN
NET INVESTMENT
PROGRAMS
CAPITAL ACCUMULATION
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
DEBT DEFAULT
FINANCIAL MARKET
BRIBES
FISCAL RULES
REAL GROWTH
GOLDEN RULE
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
HOLDING
NET LENDING
PUBLIC CONSUMPTION
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
CASH DEFICIT
COST OF CAPITAL
SANITATION
CAPITAL STOCK
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES
REAL INTEREST RATES
PUBLIC CAPITAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
PUBLIC DEFICITS
REAL INTEREST
PRIVATE SECTOR
OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR
INCOME GROWTH
FISCAL AGGREGATES
TRANSPARENCY
UNION
SELF-FINANCING
BORROWING REQUIREMENT
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
GROWTH MODEL
RESEARCH ASSISTANCE
PRESENT VALUE
PUBLIC ASSETS
FISCAL DEFICIT
PUBLIC GOODS
PENSIONS
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
INTEREST RATES
AGGREGATE DEMAND
BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING
INVESTMENT SPENDING
GOVERNMENT DEFICIT
TAX REVENUES
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
FISCAL CONSEQUENCES
ACCOUNTING
RETURNS
MACROECONOMIC MODEL
PHYSICAL ASSET
HUMAN CAPITAL
BIASES
INDEBTEDNESS
PUBLIC SERVICES
SOLVENCY
FINANCIAL MARKET PARTICIPANTS
OUTSTANDING DEBT STOCK
DEBT RATIO
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
FUTURE INCOME
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR
TAX SYSTEM
FUTURE GROWTH
TAX COLLECTION
REAL INTEREST RATE
EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION
INITIAL DEBT
MARGINAL COST
EXPENDITURES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
MEMBER COUNTRIES
PRIVATE CAPITAL
PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM
NEGATIVE VALUES
INVESTMENT RATE
BALANCE SHEET
POLITICAL ECONOMY
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
FISCAL STABILITY
FISCAL AUSTERITY
DEFAULT PREMIUM
FISCAL TARGETS
OUTSTANDING DEBT
FACE VALUE
EFFICIENCY GAINS
WELFARE LOSS
PRIVATE INVESTORS
FISCAL POLICY FRAMEWORK
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
PRIVATIZATION
BUDGET DEFICITS
PUBLIC SERVICE
DISCOUNT RATE
CURRENT ACCOUNT
DEBT DYNAMICS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
CHECKS
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
STABILIZATION POLICIES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
INEQUALITY
TAXPAYERS
PUBLIC DEFICIT
FISCAL AUTHORITIES
PUBLIC DEBT
USER FEE
PUBLIC REVENUE
TAX BASES
FUTURE CASH FLOWS
WAGES
INVESTMENT FLOWS
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
GOVERNMENT BORROWING
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
CAPITAL FORMATION
CORPORATE FINANCE
SERVICE PROVISION
ENDOWMENTS
REAL GROWTH RATE
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
INITIAL INVESTMENT
EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT INDEBTEDNESS
FISCAL RETRENCHMENT
FINANCIAL MARKETS
DEFICITS
FINANCIAL POLICY
TREASURY
BANK POLICY
EQUALITY
GROWTH RATE
CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS
CAPITAL ASSETS
DEPRECIATION
FINANCING NEEDS
DEBT ISSUANCE
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
BUDGET BALANCE
FISCAL POLICY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
TAX RATE
ASSET ACCUMULATION
MONETARY FUND
INFLATION
OPTIMAL CHOICE
RATE OF RETURN
FISCAL ADJUSTMENT
DEBT ISSUE
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
MACROECONOMIC IMPACT
INVESTMENT PROJECTS
PUBLIC FINANCE
CASH FLOW
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
DEBT FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR NET WORTH
BUDGET CONSTRAINT
TAX RATES
RETURN
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
FISCAL PROJECTIONS
PUBLIC SPENDING
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STOCKS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7543Abstract
Solvency is an intertemporal concept,
 relating to the present value of revenues and expenditures,
 and encompassing both assets and liabilities. But the
 standard practice among policy makers, financial market
 participants and international financial institutions is to
 assess the strength of the fiscal accounts solely on the
 basis of the cash deficit. Short-term cash flows matter, but
 a preponderant focus on them can encourage governments to
 invest too little, especially during episodes of fiscal
 tightening. This has potentially adverse consequences for
 growth and, paradoxically, even for fiscal solvency itself.
 The paper offers an overview of the links between fiscal
 targets, public investment, and public sector solvency.
 After reviewing the international experience with public
 investment under fiscal adjustment, the paper lays out an
 analytical framework to illustrate the consequences of using
 the public deficit as a guide to solvency. The paper then
 discusses some alternatives to conventional cash deficit
 rules and their implications for investment and fiscal solvency.Date
2012-06-08Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/7543http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7543
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries : A Framework and Some QuestionsPerotti, Roberto (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007-09)This paper surveys fiscal policy in
 developing countries from the point of view of long-run
 growth. The first section reviews existing methodologies to
 estimate the effects of fiscal policy shocks and of
 systematic fiscal policy, with time series or with
 cross-sectional methods, and their applicability to
 developing countries. The second section surveys optimal
 fiscal policy in developing countries, by considering the
 role of the intertemporal government budget, and
 sustainability and solvency. It also reviews the fuzzy
 debate on "fiscal space" and "macroeconomic
 space" - and the usefulness (or lack thereof) of these
 terms for policy analysis. The third section asks what
 theory tells us about the optimal cyclical behavior of
 fiscal policy in developing countries. It shows that it very
 much depends on the assumptions about the interactions
 between credit market imperfections at the individual,
 firms, or government level, and on the supply of external
 funds to the country. Different sets of assumptions lead to
 different implications about optimal cyclical behavior. The
 available evidence on the cyclical behavior of fiscal
 policy, and possible reasons for the observed prevalence of
 a procyclical behavior in developing countries, is also
 reviewed. If one agrees that fiscal policy is indeed less
 countercyclical than we think is optimal, the issue is how
 to correct the problem. One obvious question is why
 government do not self-insure, i.e. why they do not
 accumulate assets in upturns and decumulate them in
 downturns. This leads to the analysis of fiscal rules and
 stabilization funds, in the fourth section. The last
 section concludes with what the author considers important
 research and policy questions in each part.
-
Uganda - Fiscal Policy for Growth : Public Expenditure Review 2007, Volume 1. Executive SummaryWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2007-06-24)Uganda needs to increase infrastructure investments if impressive growth is to continue. But the Budget is showing increasing signs of stress from expenditure pressures and fiscal tightening. Recent increases in employee costs in central Government functions of public administration, justice law and order, defense, prisons and police have deteriorated the composition of the Budget from the perspective of growth. In common with global experience in tight fiscal circumstances, public infrastructure spending is getting squeezed. These expenditure trends suggest a further squeeze on infrastructure and maintenance is inevitable, in which case growth could slow down. This report concerns how should Uganda respond to these fiscal challenges? Whereas there is scope for prudent new concessional borrowing for infrastructure, disbursement rates in infrastructure projects are too low, making it a priority to address constraints to effective spending. As part of a fiscal strategy for growth, Uganda needs in the short to medium-term to rapidly improve revenue performance without taxing key growth sectors, and to shift the composition of spending towards infrastructure. A compositional shift will require deep public sector reforms, early action on postponed reforms to public administration, and a working program to reduce waste and increase the efficiency of public expenditures, including in Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF) priority sectors and agencies. A reduction in waste and an increase in public sector efficiency will ultimately require more accountability for the delivery of quality public services than is evident in Uganda today. It will also require a much more systematic effort by spending ministries and agencies: a more structured and a much more strategic approach to public service efficiency from the ministry of finance could be built into budget framework papers as well as preparation of the next Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP).
-
Uganda - Fiscal Policy for Growth : Public Expenditure Review 2007, Volume 2. Main ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2007-06-24)Uganda needs to increase infrastructure investments if impressive growth is to continue. But the Budget is showing increasing signs of stress from expenditure pressures and fiscal tightening. Recent increases in employee costs in central Government functions of public administration, justice law and order, defense, prisons and police have deteriorated the composition of the Budget from the perspective of growth. In common with global experience in tight fiscal circumstances, public infrastructure spending is getting squeezed. These expenditure trends suggest a further squeeze on infrastructure and maintenance is inevitable, in which case growth could slow down. This report concerns how should Uganda respond to these fiscal challenges? Whereas there is scope for prudent new concessional borrowing for infrastructure, disbursement rates in infrastructure projects are too low, making it a priority to address constraints to effective spending. As part of a fiscal strategy for growth, Uganda needs in the short to medium-term to rapidly improve revenue performance without taxing key growth sectors, and to shift the composition of spending towards infrastructure. A compositional shift will require deep public sector reforms, early action on postponed reforms to public administration, and a working program to reduce waste and increase the efficiency of public expenditures, including in Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF) priority sectors and agencies. A reduction in waste and an increase in public sector efficiency will ultimately require more accountability for the delivery of quality public services than is evident in Uganda today. It will also require a much more systematic effort by spending ministries and agencies: a more structured and a much more strategic approach to public service efficiency from the ministry of finance could be built into budget framework papers as well as preparation of the next Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP).