Turkey - Public Expenditure and Institutional Review : Reforming Budgetary Institutions for Effective Government
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
FINANCIAL STATISTICSPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
FISCAL STANCE
PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC SECTOR BORROWING
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
DECISION- MAKING
AGGREGATES
ACCOUNTABILITY
STRUCTURAL APPROACHES
BUREAUCRACY
FISCAL COSTS
COUNCIL OF MINISTERS
PUBLIC FINANCING
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
ANTI-CORRUPTION
FISCAL PLANS
CPI
DEBT
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
FISCAL ADJUSTMENTS
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCES
BUDGET SYSTEM
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
AUDITS
POLICY MAKERS
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
BUDGET PROCESS
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
COLLECTIVE DECISION MAKING
BUDGETARY FUNDS
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
STATE PLANNING
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
BASIC EDUCATION
TAX
SOCIAL SECURITY
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
EXCHANGE RATE
ECONOMIC RECOVERY
DECISION MAKING
FINANCIAL SECTOR
AUDIT REPORTS
EMPLOYMENT
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
PUBLIC AGENCIES
ECONOMIC CRISIS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
EXECUTION
PROCUREMENT
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
BUDGET FORMULATION
FISCAL CONTROL
TAXATION
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
BUDGET ACCOUNTING
GOVERNMENT BORROWING
CENTRAL AGENCIES
INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT
BUDGETING
POLICY DECISIONS
DECISION-MAKING
RESOURCE USE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITING
BUDGET EXPENDITURES
NON-WAGE PAYMENTS TAXATION
PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC POLICY
DEFICITS
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT REFORM
BUDGET ANALYSIS
TREASURY
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
EBF
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
INCOME
FISCAL
DECISION MAKERS
BUDGET EXECUTION
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL CONSOLIDATION
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
FISCAL POLICY
GOVERNMENT DECISION-MAKING
FISCAL DEFICIT
ACCOUNTS
BUDGET REFORM
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
INTEREST RATES
BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
BUDGETARY POLICY
FISCAL DEFICITS
EXTRA BUDGETARY FUNDS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
POLICY FORMATION
INFLATION
FINANCIAL REGULATIONS
FINANCIAL SYSTEM
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
PUBLIC FINANCE
WAGES PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
PRESIDENCY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
GOVERNMENT SECTOR
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GNP
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SECTOR
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
CONSOLIDATED EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC SPENDING
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
REPORTING
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15482Abstract
This Public Expenditure and
 Institutional Review presents the findings of an analysis of
 the budget, and institutions of public expenditure
 management, and accountability, fundamental to policy
 decisions, and economic management. It builds on extensive
 analysis undertaken by the Special Ad Hoc Committee on
 Fiscal Transparency, and Public Finance, and, the review
 suggests that the current economic crisis is deep-rooted in
 the institutions of collective decision making in
 government, confirming that unless fundamental improvements
 are made to the processes for formulating public policy,
 allocating resources, and implementing budgets, any economic
 recovery will almost certainly be fragile, and short-lived.
 Thus, from the perspectives of system performance, and
 structural and institutional aspects, an improved budgetary
 system should enable the government to achieve aggregate
 fiscal magnitudes, based on expenditures, sustained by tax,
 and non-tax resources; the budget should generate the
 adequate information to ensure funding of key policy
 objectives; and, public accountability should generate
 incentives to support performance objectives. The report
 identifies aggregate fiscal management as a major weakness,
 compromised by the significant growth of off-budget
 activity, while the weakness of the budget system in terms
 of ability to support decision-making, is equally
 pernicious. A series of actions to restore fiscal discipline
 are outlined for the short-term (2001), and initiatives for
 a multi-year budget commencing in 2002 are included.
 Recommendations include strengthening the aggregate fiscal
 program management capacity; reviving policy formulation
 capacity, and institutional framework to define budgetary
 policy; and, initiating budget control devolution,
 introducing a budget performance approach.Date
2013-08-29Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15482http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15482
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
The Great Crisis and Fiscal Institutions in Eastern and Central Europe
 and Central AsiaSanchez, Luis Alvaro; Barbone, Luca; Islam, Roumeen (2012-03-19)This paper examines fiscal outcomes in
 Eastern and Central European countries before and during the
 global crisis of 2008-2010. These outcomes are evaluated in
 the context of overall changes in fiscal institutions and
 global market conditions. Eastern and Central European
 countries situations improved dramatically in the
 pre-crisis period as tax revenues boomed, and fiscal
 institutions were reformed. Expenditures increased quite
 significantly in real terms for some of the countries in the
 pre-crisis era so that when tax revenues collapsed in the
 wake of the crisis, the countries were left with large
 deficits. Institutional reform helped countries manage their
 fiscal situations better, but the crisis also exposed
 shortcomings of the status quo. In the post-crisis period,
 fiscal institutions aimed at promoting fiscal discipline are
 being strengthened. Governments will also need to take a
 closer look at the sustainability of current expenditure
 patterns, particularly the strong emphasis on social expenditures.
-
Syrian Arab Republic : Modernization of Public Financial ManagementPetrie, Murray; Fouad, Manal; Gardner, John; Webber, David; Messali, Pierre; Radev, Dimitar (International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-03-21)The authorities have made good recent
 progress in important public financial management (PFM)
 areas. They have strengthened the overall regulatory
 framework of the budget process by adopting a new basic
 finance law, and further deepened budget integration by
 transferring the responsibilities for the capital budget
 from the State Planning Commission (SPC) to the Ministry of
 Finance (MoF). They have also improved the budget
 presentation by providing information to parliament for
 selected ministries on the base of a simple program
 structure.The main purpose of this report is to
 assist the authorities in advancing their reform agenda for
 modernization of the PFM system. To this end, the report:
 Develops an action plan for PFM reform. The plan sets out
 specific activities in a selection of reform areas
 identified as priorities in discussion with the Minister of
 Finance, as well as the suggested timing and possible
 requirement of technicalassistance (TA); and
 elaborates, in detail, actions that need to be undertaken in
 four broad PFM areas as identified in the plan: (i)
 medium-term orientation of the budget; (ii) budget
 integration reforms; (iii) budgetary treatment of public
 economic entities; and (iv) treasury reforms. Key
 recommendations of the report include:Prepare a
 three-year fiscal forecast and link fiscal projections to an
 approved debtsustainability and fiscal strategy
 framework; present as part of the budget documentation
 information on the revenues and expenditures of the public
 economic entities; and progressively strengthen governance
 of the sector; gradually extend the use of programs for
 presentation purposes in the budget by adding up to five to
 six new ministries in 2010, including the MoF and the
 ministry of local administration (MoLA); further integrate
 the management of the recurrent and capital budgets by the
 budget department in the MoF; the reform areas included in
 the action plan reflect initial priorities and are not an
 assessment of all areas in which the PFM system in Syria
 might be improved. Strengthen the government banking
 arrangements by introducing a treasury single account (TSA)
 system; develop accounting and cash management functions at
 the MoF, by establishing accounting and cash management
 units in the treasury department; and introduce new budget
 classification and chart of accounts (CoA) to be integrated
 into a new integrated financial management information
 system (GFMIS).