Keywords
STOCK OPTIONENFORCEMENT ACTION
DERIVATIVE
PRICE MOVEMENTS
SECURITIES DEALERS
SHAREHOLDER
FINANCIAL ADVISER
DEBT SECURITIES
ASSET VALUE
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
CENTRAL BANK
INTERNATIONAL BANK
MUTUAL FUNDS
TAX LAW
DEBT SECURITY
SECURITIES REGISTRATIONS
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
MARKET TRANSPARENCY
INTERNAL AUDIT
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES
DEBT
BROKERAGE FIRM
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
BANKRUPTCY LAW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
VALUATION
AUDITS
BANKING LAWS
MARKET MANIPULATION
CAPITAL REQUIREMENT
ENFORCEMENT POWERS
MARKET OVERSIGHT
SECURITIES FIRM
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
GROUPS OF INVESTORS
TAX
TRADING VOLUMES
TRANSACTION
EQUITY TRADING
FUND UNITS
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME
MARKET PRICE
EQUITY INVESTMENTS
DISCLOSURE
SHAREHOLDERS
BOND MARKET
CAPITAL MARKETS
PENSION
FUND DISCLOSURE
TRADING SYSTEM
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DEPOSITS
BOND
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HOLDING
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
MARKET FAILURES
FOREIGN INVESTORS
FAIR VALUE
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
PORTFOLIO
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
REAL-TIME MARKET
PRIVATE AUDITING
MARKET INTERMEDIARIES
HOLDINGS
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
WARRANTS
BID
MARKET PARTICIPANTS
REGULATORY OVERSIGHT
ASSET MANAGEMENT
BANKRUPTCY
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
TRADING SURVEILLANCE
TRANSPARENCY
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
ISSUANCE
TANGIBLE ASSETS
NET ASSET
INVESTMENT ADVISERS
TURNOVER
INSIDER
FINANCES
SECONDARY MARKET
ACCOUNTING
CAPITAL ADEQUACY
PUBLIC INFORMATION
AUDIT COMMITTEE
CUSTODY
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
SMALL CAP
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP
INSURANCE
TRADING
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
GROSS SETTLEMENT SYSTEM
MUTUAL FUND MANAGEMENT
INSIDERS
IPO
VALUATION PROCESS
SYSTEMIC RISKS
ACCOUNTING STANDARD
LEGAL AUTHORITY
FUND MANAGEMENT
INSIDER TRADING
FRAUDS
DISCLOSURE SYSTEM
AUDITOR
FUND SHAREHOLDERS
CIVIL PENALTIES
BROKER DEALER
MARKET INTERMEDIARY
SECURITIES DEPOSITORY
BROKERAGE
PROSPECTUS
SELF-REGULATION
EQUITY MARKET
SECURITIES
PRUDENTIAL STANDARD
SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL
COMPANY STOCKS
INVESTOR FUNDS
COMPANY STOCK
EQUITIES
AUDITORS
INDIVIDUAL SECURITIES
INVESTMENT ADVISORS
REGULATORY SYSTEM
CAPITAL MARKET DEVELOPMENT
MUTUAL FUND
BROKERAGE ACCOUNTS
INVESTOR EDUCATION
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
WITHDRAWAL
RISK FACTORS
SECURITIES EXCHANGES
SECURITIES LAW
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS
PRIVATE RATING AGENCIES
TRADING SYSTEMS
EQUITY SECURITIES
MUTUAL FUND ASSETS
SECURITIES REGULATION
BROKER
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
TRUSTEE
SECURITIES MARKETS
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
INVESTOR CONFIDENCE
VALUABLE ASSET
BROKER-DEALER
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT
FUND MANAGERS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
SHARE PRICE
AUDIT COMMITTEES
DEBT OFFERINGS
FUND EXPENSES
SETTLEMENT
STOCK MARKET
CLASS ACTION
DEFAULT RISK
INSIDE INFORMATION
RISK MANAGEMENT
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE
UNDERWRITER
LEGAL PROTECTION
CAPITAL MARKET
FIDUCIARY DUTY
OPEN-END FUNDS
GOVERNMENT DEBT
ELECTRONIC FUNDS
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANIES
STOCK TRADING
PROVIDENT FUNDS
CORPORATE FRAUD
LEGAL JURISDICTION
CAPITAL MARKET REGULATION
SYSTEMIC RISK
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
BROKERS
INDIVIDUAL STOCK
FUTURES EXCHANGE
STOCK EXCHANGE
MARKET SHARES
LIABILITY
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
CONFIDENTIALITY
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
SECURITIES COMMISSIONS
MONETARY FUND
FINANCIAL ADVISORS
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
NAV
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
MARKET SURVEILLANCE
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
SECURITIES LAWS
DEBT MARKET
BROKER-DEALERS
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT
NET ASSET VALUE
REDEMPTION
REDEMPTION OF UNITS
SECURITIES INVESTMENTS
CREDITOR RIGHTS
DERIVATIVES
CIVIL LAW
REGULATORY STANDARDS
DISCLOSURE STANDARDS
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
FOREIGN CURRENCY
FUTURES
CREDITOR
FOREIGN MARKETS
SECURITIES FIRMS
STOCKS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28232Abstract
The responsibilities of the regulator
 should be clearly and objectively stated. The regulator
 should be operationally independent and accountable in the
 exercise of its functions and powers. The regulator should
 have adequate powers, proper resources and the capacity to
 perform its functions and exercise its powers. The regulator
 should adopt clear and consistent regulatory processes. The
 staff of the regulator should observe the highest
 professional standards including appropriate standards of
 confidentiality. The regulatory regime should make
 appropriate use of Self-Regulatory Organizations (SROs) that
 exercise some direct oversight responsibility for their
 respective areas of competence, and to the extent
 appropriate to the size and complexity of the markets. SROs
 should be subject to the oversight of the regulator and
 should observe standards of fairness and confidentiality
 when exercising powers and delegated responsibilities. The
 regulator should have comprehensive inspection,
 investigation and surveillance powers. The regulator should
 have comprehensive enforcement powers. The regulatory system
 should ensure an effective and credible use of inspection,
 investigation, surveillance and enforcement powers and
 implementation of an effective compliance program. The
 regulator should have authority to share both public and
 non-public information with domestic and foreign
 counterparts. Regulators should establish information
 sharing mechanisms that set out when and how they will share
 both public and non-public information with their domestic
 and foreign counterparts. The regulatory system should allow
 for assistance to be provided to foreign regulators who need
 to make inquiries in the discharge of their functions and
 exercise of their powers.Date
2017-09-08Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/28232http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28232
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
SME Exchanges in Emerging Market Economies : A Stocktaking of Development PracticesKonidaris, Tanya; Harwood, Alison (World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2015-02-03)In recent years, many emerging market countries have developed or are in the process of developing SME Exchanges to provide financing to SMEs, but few have succeeded. This paper aims to help stock exchanges and policy makers think through the key questions to be addressed to determine if, when, how and for whom to develop an SME Exchange in emerging market countries. It takes stock of some of the actions that exchanges can take to reduce issuance costs, in time and money for SMEs, without compromising the prudential needs of investors. The paper draws on the experience of seven SME Exchanges and the World Federation of Exchanges that participated in a workshop organized and led by the WBG to discuss these and other questions. It does not recommend a specific model to follow and does not address specific context issues, however the analysis suggests approaches that are widespread and/or could be beneficial to consider such as (1) focus on SMEs with a sizeable growth rate, (2) have the SME exchange legally related to the main board, (3) do not reduce disclosure content to reduce costs, (4) allow private placements, (5) have well regulated advisors to vet issuers and provide comfort to investors about the quality of the issue, (6) have outreach, public awareness campaign and training for SMEs, (7) consider tax incentives for investors. The report is the first in a series on this topic, and subsequent reports will address and expand on related and broader issues.
-
Review of Governance of Collective Investment Funds in the New Member States of the European UnionWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)This review examines corporate
 governance practices in the investment fund sector of the
 ten new member states in the European Union, composed of the
 European countries that transitioned to market economies in
 the 1990s: the eight countries that joined the European
 Union (EU) in 2004 .Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary,
 Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. plus
 Bulgaria and Romania which joined in 2007. Croatia, for
 which accession negotiations started in 2005, is also
 included in this Review. (For simplification, these
 countries will be referred to as the EU11.) The review draws
 on two sources for data. Over the last two years, in-depth
 diagnostic reviews of investment governance were conducted
 by the World Bank in two of the countries, the Czech
 Republic and Slovenia. The objectives of the reviews were to
 develop a set of good practices. for investment fund
 governance and provide specific recommendations for the
 supervisory authorities in each country. The second source
 was the public websites of each of the supervisory
 authorities. The analysis in the review also draws on a
 number of recent studies done by international organizations
 such as IOSCO and the EU on governance in the investment
 fund sector. This review does not attempt to replicate these
 studies, but instead aims to identify selected areas where
 fund governance could be strengthened either by laws and
 regulations or by government policies.
-
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : UkraineWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-15)This report assesses Ukraine's corporate governance policy framework and enforcement and compliance practices. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulations, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Ukraine. Several developments have worked to improve the corporate governance environment in recent years, including high levels of economic growth and a growing demand for capital growth in Ukrainian industry. The equity market has boomed, and over 45 companies have issued depository receipts abroad. A corporate governance code was issued in 2003, and a number of private-sector and donor initiatives have continued to work to promulgate the code and introduce good practice at the company level. Several reforms have been carried out, including the passage of a new securities law. The report recommends: (i) a variety of legal reforms, including a revised company law that would be enacted by the Parliament, (ii) institutional strengthening, including focusing the enforcement activities of the Securities and Stock Market State Commission (SSMSC) on large and traded companies, and (iii) enhanced listing requirements for the top tier of the Persha Fondova Totgovelna System (PFTS), including a requirement to "comply or explain" compliance with the Ukraine Corporate Governance Principles.