Keywords
COMMERCIAL PAPERLIQUIDITY
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
DERIVATIVE
HARMONIZATION OF LAWS
INSTRUMENT OF RATIFICATION
CONFLICT
DEBT SECURITIES
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
INTERNATIONAL BANK
ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS
TERM DEPOSITS
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
DEBT
OFFICIAL LANGUAGES
INVESTMENT POLICIES
BOUNDARIES
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
JUDGES
VALUATION
ARBITRATION REQUEST
AMBASSADOR
INVESTMENT HORIZONS
LLC
CASH FLOWS
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TREATY
CLAIMANT
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
FINANCE CORPORATION
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
VALUATION TECHNIQUE
NATIONALITY OF ARBITRATORS
DISCLOSURE
ARBITRATION RULES
RECONSTRUCTION
CASE MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PENDING PROCEEDINGS
MATURITY
CAPACITY BUILDING
CRIMINAL LAW
DEPOSIT
DEFERRED REVENUE
DEPOSITS
DIPLOMACY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARKET DATA
HOLDING
FOREIGN INVESTORS
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
FAIR VALUE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
LIQUIDITY RISKS
ROAD
FINANCIAL RISKS
ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS
HOLDINGS
INVESTMENT CONTRACT
TRANSPARENCY
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT
CONFLICT RESOLUTION
ARBITRATION AWARDS
CASE ADMINISTRATION
EXCHANGE RATES
AMORTIZATION
COURT
NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS
MARKET PRICES
PENDING ARBITRATION
INTEREST RATES
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN STATES
ACCOUNTING
REGISTRATION FEES
RETURNS
MODERN ARBITRATION
FAIR VALUES
INVESTMENT DISPUTES
MEETINGS
TRADE AGREEMENT
TRADING
ARBITRATIONS
BANK ACCOUNT
MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT GUARANTEE AGENCY
REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
RECEIVABLES
INSTRUMENT
INTERNATIONAL LAW
LEGAL PRACTITIONERS
CLAIMANTS
FINANCIAL POSITION
JUDGMENT
FINANCIAL ASSETS
MANDATE
ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
NEGOTIATORS
FINANCIAL REPORTING
SWAPS
TRUST FUNDS
FACTS
INVESTMENT CONTRACTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
LIQUID FUNDS
RULES IN EFFECT
ENTRY INTO FORCE
EXPENDITURES
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS
SECURITIES
SENIOR DEBT
AMOUNT OF CREDIT
NATIONS
JUDICIAL TRAINING
COLLATERAL
IFC
CURRENCY
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
INVESTMENT PROMOTION
ARBITRATOR
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
FRAUD
ARBITRATORS
COMMERCIAL DISPUTES
INSURANCE CORPORATION
ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES
SETTLEMENT PROVISIONS
FEE INCOME
TIME DEPOSITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
HEARING ROOM
INVESTING
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
SETTLEMENT
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES
RISK MANAGEMENT
DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS
MORTGAGE
LIQUIDITY RISK
CREDIT RISK
LEGAL PROTECTION
INVESTMENT INCOME
JURISDICTION
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
PORTFOLIOS
REMEDIES
EXPENDITURE
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS
ACTIVE MARKETS
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
MONEY MARKET
ARBITRATION CASES
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
ARBITRAL AWARD
FOREIGN INVESTOR
PANEL OF ARBITRATORS
LOAN
PROCEDURAL RULES
SUBSCRIPTIONS
CONFIDENTIALITY
MEETING
CHAPTER 7
INTEREST INCOME
ARBITRATION
RULES
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS
IBRD
EQUIPMENT
LIQUID MONEY
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS
CREDIT ENHANCEMENTS
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
MONETARY FUND
REMEDY
FINANCIAL LOSS
FORWARD CONTRACTS
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
CONVENTION
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
PAR VALUE
ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL
CASH FLOW
INTERNATIONAL COURTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
UNIVERSITIES
ARBITRATION SYSTEM
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
YIELD CURVES
DERIVATIVES
COMPARATIVE LAW
INVESTMENT RETURNS
DISPUTE
TREATIES
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16648Abstract
International investment law and
 international investment arbitration are relatively new
 disciplines: the first bilateral investment treaty was
 signed by Pakistan and Germany in 1959, the first investment
 treaty offering investor-state arbitration was concluded in
 1968 between the Netherlands and Indonesia, the first
 International Center for Settlement of Investment Dispute
 (ICSID) case was registered in 1972, and the first
 treaty-based investment case was registered by the Centre in
 1987. The Centre itself was established in 1966, along with
 the coming into force of the ICSID convention. It was the
 first dispute resolution facility designed exclusively for
 international investment dispute settlement, and it
 continues to be the only international facility dedicated to
 this area. This specialized mandate has allowed ICSID to
 develop an unparalleled expertise and focus, which benefits
 disputing parties, arbitrators and contracting states.
 Cumulatively, ICSID has administered over 430 cases,
 involving foreign investors from all regions of the world
 and more than 95 states and state agencies under the ICSID
 convention and rules. In addition, it has administered over
 40 investment arbitration cases initiated under the United
 Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
 arbitration rules and other arbitral rules. The
 end-of-fiscal year results confirm that ICSID remains the
 leader in international investment dispute resolution. This
 report is organized as follows: chapter one gives
 introduction; chapter two gives list of contracting states
 and other signatories of the convention; chapter three
 presents panels of arbitrators and of conciliators; chapter
 four gives operations of the Centre; chapter five presents
 outreach of ICSID; chapter six deals with forty-sixth annual
 meeting of the administrative council; and chapter seven
 presents financial statements of ICSID.Date
2014-01-28Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16648http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16648
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
ICSID 2012 Annual ReportInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (Washington, DC, 2014-01-28)The recent growth in investor-state
 arbitration has continued apace. International Center for
 Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) registered a record
 38 cases in 2011, and had registered 19 further cases by
 June 30, 2012. Included in these numbers are 3 new
 conciliation cases, showing an increased resort not simply
 to arbitration but also to alternative methods of dispute
 resolution available under the ICSID convention and
 additional facility. Such statistics should not be
 considered in isolation from their broader economic context.
 There have been unprecedented increases in global flows of
 foreign direct investment in the last two decades. These
 statistics must also be read in light of the fact that
 international investment law and investor-state dispute
 settlement are a new discipline. ICSID continues to play a
 vital role in the evolving international investment legal
 system. Its primary job is very specific: to offer foreign
 investors and host States an impartial, effective and
 accessible facility for arbitration and conciliation of
 international investment disputes. ICSID has taken numerous
 steps in the past year to enhance its capacity to fulfill
 this role. In September of 2011, ICSID announced a new list
 of Chairman's appointees to the panel of arbitrators
 and panel of conciliators. ICSID will continue its efforts
 to provide excellent service to disputing parties in the
 upcoming year.
-
ICSID 2014 Annual ReportInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2015-02-02)The Centre s activities in fiscal year
 2014 are presented in detail in this report. They
 demonstrate why the Centre is still considered the lead
 international institution in this field. ICSID benefits from
 a broad and diverse membership, representing States from all
 legal traditions. In the past year ICSID welcomed Canada as
 the 150th Member State, and the Republic of San Marino as
 the 159th signatory State to the ICSID Convention.
 Similarly, ICSID has encouraged the development of a larger
 and more diverse group of case decision-makers, who reflect
 the diversity of ICSID s membership. It has adopted
 practices to propose arbitrators and conciliators from all
 States and of both genders, and has made progress in
 reaching this objective. Likewise, Member States have
 contributed to this objective by designating 82 new persons
 to the Panels of Arbitrators and of Conciliators in the past year.
-
MIGA Annual Report 2010, Volume 2Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-03-19)The Multilateral Investment Guarantee
 Agency's (MIGA's) mandate to promote foreign
 direct investment into developing countries to improve
 people's lives and create more opportunities remains
 more important than ever. Despite a challenging business
 climate, during the past year MIGA sought out and supported
 projects that contributed to its mission and growth. In
 fiscal year 2010, MIGA provided $1.5 billion in new
 guarantee coverage. This amount targeted a wide range of
 projects across all regions from bank liquidity in Serbia
 and Latvia to guarantees on complex port projects in Turkey,
 China, and Senegal. Over the past year MIGA supported
 investments in frontier markets, such as Sierra Leone and
 Ethiopia. And as was the case last year, MIGA experienced a
 lower-than-usual level of cancellation. MIGA also continued
 to support financial flows from banks to their subsidiaries
 in Europe and Central Asia that were harmed by the financial
 crisis. Beyond the financial sector, MIGA supported clients
 seeking political risk insurance for energy and
 infrastructure investments with a strong development impact.
 The projects that MIGA supports create jobs; provide water,
 electricity, and other basic services; strengthen financial
 systems; generate tax revenues; transfer skills and
 technological know-how; and help countries tap natural
 resources in an environmentally sustainable way. MIGA again
 demonstrated thought leadership in the political risk
 insurance arena. The report fills an information gap and
 underlines that investors view political risk as the most
 important short- and medium-term obstacle to investing in
 developing countries. MIGA's management continues to
 focus on change to increase effectiveness and improve
 efficiency for investors and lenders. MIGA has also worked
 more closely with other units of the World Bank Group to
 ensure the best use of the Bank Group's expertise,
 products, and services.