Promoting Access to Primary Equity Markets : A Legal and Regulatory Approach
DOMESTIC STOCK EXCHANGES
GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
TOTAL MARKET CAPITALIZATION
COST OF CAPITAL
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM
NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS
CAPITAL GAINS TAXES
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISE
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractThis paper examines legal and regulatory measures that can be taken to promote access to the primary market in emerging market economies. While capital market development depends on many factors including, primarily, a favorable macroeconomic environment, an appropriately designed and effective legal and regulatory framework can help to encourage market growth and to increase access to finance for all companies, including small- and medium-sized enterprises. In this paper we identify the basic necessities that underpin a regulatory regime that is cost effective and strikes an appropriate balance between, on the one hand, laws and regulations that may be too restrictive to achieve a supply of capital and, on the other, those that may be so relaxed that investors feel that there is an unacceptable level of risk and do not care to venture into the market. We explore the legal foundations for the successful operation of a primary market for securities and identify disclosure and effective monitoring and enforcement as essential elements of legal protection. We then examine different legal and regulatory approaches for improving access to finance. We discuss measures that can be used by traditional stock exchanges to attract smaller enterprises to their lists as well as recent initiatives to create second boards or divide the main board into different market segments. We also discuss different mechanisms for companies to raise funds outside of a formal stock market listing, including private placements and private equity. Finally, we propose some recommendations for a simple legal and regulatory framework that will help promote access to primary equity markets, via both the traditional exchange as well as other alternatives.
TypePublications & Research
Copyright/LicenseCC BY 3.0 IGO
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : VietnamWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-11-19)This report assesses Vietnam's corporate governance policy framework. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulation, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Vietnam. It is an update of the 2006 Corporate Governance ROSC for Vietnam. Good corporate governance enhances investor trust, protects minority shareholders, and encourages better decision making and improved relations with workers, creditors, and other stakeholders. Better investor protection can lower the cost of capital and encourage companies to list and raise funds through equity markets. Good corporate governance also helps to ensure that these companies operate more transparently and efficiently. Vietnam has undertaken important corporate governance reforms in recent years. However protecting minority shareholders, fully tapping the potential of capital markets, and professionalizing boards and management will require that reform continues. Key reforms include: Developing an action plan to address core failings of state owned enterprise corporate governance, including replacing the current state economic groups, or SEG oriented system with one that has more accountable state ownership; and Increasing transparency with greater auditor independence, better disclosure of ownership and control, and convergence of accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS.
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Russian FederationWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-02-09)This report assesses Russia's corporate governance policy framework. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulation, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Russia. Corporate governance has been a major policy issue in Russia since the beginning of its transition to a market economy. The privatization process of the early 1990s was put in place before most elements of the corporate governance and investor protection framework, and there were many widely publicized abuses, leading to very low asset prices. Most observers agree that the corporate governance environment has improved in recent years as the government has enhanced the legal and policy framework, and key institutions have grown in sophistication and maturity. Many major Russian companies have also voluntarily improved their financial and ownership transparency. A number of reform initiatives are currently underway. The report (and this summary) is organized into four sections: i) the commitment of the public and private sectors to reform; ii) shareholder rights; iii) disclosure and transparency; and iv) Boards of Directors. Policy recommendations are developed in detail at the end of each section. The report also includes a special annex that details the reform agenda focusing on related party transaction approval and disclosure, based on the approach of the Protecting Investors indicator developed in the World Bank's Doing Business report.
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : ZambiaWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-15)Good corporate governance ensures that companies use their resources more efficiently, protects minority shareholders, leads to better decision making, and improves relations with workers, creditors, and other stakeholders. It is an important prerequisite for attracting the patient capital needed for sustained long-term economic growth. This report provides an assessment of Zambia's corporate governance policy framework. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulation, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Zambia. Tapping the potential of capital markets and professionalizing boards and management will require reform efforts to continue. The companies act should be revised and harmonized with the securities act. Revisions should be accompanied by an analysis of lessons learned from the recently revised companies act in the UK. Stakeholders should consider moving explicit protection against unfair related party transactions into the Code, and revising the non-financial disclosure framework for listed companies. The Lusaka Stock Exchange (LuSE) and its stakeholders should then consider revisions to the code and further develop the LuSE website as a primary source of information about listed companies. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should continue to build its enforcement capacity, and to establish corporate governance enforcement priorities. More support and resources should be provided by the public and private sector to the Institute of Directors of Zambia.