Pakistan - Balochistan Province : Public Financial Management and Accountability Assessment
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
LIQUIDITYBUDGET DOCUMENTATION
CASH RATIONING
ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION
FINANCIAL STATISTICS
PUBLIC REVENUES
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
FINANCIAL REPORTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET CREDIBILITY
EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
DISTRIBUTION OF REVENUES
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL BANK
REVENUE ESTIMATE
REFORM STRATEGY
INTERNAL CONTROLS
DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS
INTERNAL AUDIT
REFORM AGENDA
DEBT
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS
PUBLIC FINANCE LAW
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
REVENUE COLLECTION
PUBLIC FINANCES
APPROPRIATIONS
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
DUE PROCESS
BUDGET PREPARATION
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
BUDGET PROCESS
EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
AUTONOMOUS BODIES
PUBLIC SERVICE
SELF-ASSESSMENT
AUDITOR GENERAL
OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE
COMPOSITION OF EXPENDITURES
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
TAX
FISCAL FORECASTS
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
FISCAL RISK
EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES
REVENUE ESTIMATES
DEVOLUTION
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
PUBLIC
REFORM PROGRAMS
PROGRAMS
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
REVENUE FORECASTING
PUBLIC DEBT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
BUDGET FORMULATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FISCAL YEARS
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS
BUDGET ESTIMATES
PROVISIONS
ANNUAL BUDGET
DOMESTIC REVENUE
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
BUDGET PERFORMANCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
COMMUNITY SERVICES
APPROPRIATION
DECISION-MAKING
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
NATURAL RESOURCES
BUDGET INSTITUTIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
EFFICIENCY OF EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC FUNDS
DEBT SERVICE
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
TREASURY
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
TRANSPARENCY
PROVINCIAL LEVELS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
FEDERAL TRANSFERS
BUDGET SUPPORT OPERATIONS
BUDGET EXECUTION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET OUTCOMES
EXTERNAL SHOCKS
REFORM EFFORTS
BUDGET PLANNING
PUBLIC ACCOUNT
FISCAL RISKS
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION
ARTICLE
AGGREGATE FISCAL
BORROWING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BUDGET SUPPORT
BUDGETARY OUTCOMES
DEBT SERVICING
BUDGET CYCLE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FISCAL DEFICITS
BUDGET RESOURCES
EXPENDITURE OBLIGATIONS
FINANCIAL SYSTEM
ACCOUNTING
REALLOCATIONS
SOCIAL SERVICES
PUBLIC FINANCE
DEBT MANAGEMENT
DONOR FUNDS
FINANCIAL YEARS
BUDGET EXPENDITURE
REVENUE MANAGEMENT
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
AGGREGATE REVENUE
FISCAL REPORTING
PUBLIC SERVICES
BUDGET TRANSFERS
GOVERNMENT BUDGETING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET PROPOSALS
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7770Abstract
This document reports on a Public
 Financial Management and Accountability Assessment (PFMAA)
 for the province of Balochistan. The study was commissioned
 jointly by the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB),
 the UK Department for International Development (DfID), and
 the European Commission (EC). The Government of Balochistan
 welcomed the initiative of the World Bank, ADB, DFID and EC
 in carrying out the PFM assessment. The provincial Finance
 Department is also working on framing new financial rules in
 order to streamline utilization of funds while ensuring
 transparency in financial management.. The PFMAA was
 conducted against 31 Public Financial Management (PFM)
 performance measurement indicators in accordance with the
 Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) framework.Date
2007-05Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/7770http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7770
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.
-
Indonesia : Repeat Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Report and Performance IndicatorsWorld Bank (World Bank, Jakarta, 2012-12)This public expenditure and financial
 accountability (PEFA) assessment for Indonesia was
 undertaken by a team of World Bank staff and development
 partners with close involvement of counterparts from the
 Government of Indonesia, including the ministry of finance,
 state ministry of development planning (Bappenas), and some
 line ministries. The objective of the assessment is to
 update the integrated, standardized, indicator-led
 assessment of public financial management (PFM) systems,
 processes, and institutions as a whole against good
 international practices. This PEFA assessment has been
 funded by the Bank and a multi-donor trust fund, supported
 by contributions from the European Commission, the
 Governments of the Netherlands and the Swiss Confederation,
 and United States Agency for International Development
 (USAID). This report focuses mainly on the changes in the
 performance of the PFM system from 2007 to 2011. This report
 focuses largely on the major changes since 2007, and also on
 the ongoing reforms that should impact an assessment in the
 future organizations. It provides an integrated,
 standardized, and indicator-led methodology to measure and
 monitor PFM performance over time. The objective is to help
 assess the performance of PFM systems, processes, and
 institutions relative to internationally recognized good
 system characteristics. The rating methodology, covering a
 set of 31 high level performance indicators, with over 70
 dimensions, emphasizes empirical and observable facets for
 each PFM area.
-
Province of Cordoba, Republic of Argentina : Public Financial Management AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-12-11)This public financial management
 assessment for Cordoba has three main objectives: (i) to
 provide the provincial governments with a reference tool for
 dialogue and action to strengthen their public financial
 management (PFM) systems; (ii) to provide an assessment of
 provincial PFM systems, identifying and addressing their
 main fiduciary issues, as well as the impact of these issues
 on the implementation of World Bank operations; and (iii) to
 contribute to the World Bank's dialogue with
 Argentina's national and provincial authorities on
 fiduciary portfolio management and reliance on country
 systems. The study focuses on budget preparation and
 execution, with emphasis on budget comprehensiveness and
 performance, and on public accountancy and control. It
 describes strengths and weaknesses of the provincial systems
 and analyzes their impact on fiscal discipline and the
 allocation of resources. Chapter 2 of this assessment
 describes the economic and institutional framework of the
 Province of San Juan. Chapter 3 summarizes the
 province's main achievements and challenges ahead in
 public financial management reform, drawing on Chapter 4,
 which gives a detailed analysis of public financial
 management in the province, using the PEFA indicators agreed
 with the provincial government. Chapter 3 summarizes the
 province's main achievements and challenges ahead in
 public financial management reform, drawing on Chapter 4,
 which gives a detailed analysis of public financial
 management in the province, using the PEFA indicators agreed
 with the provincial government.