• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Corruption and Transparency Collection
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Corruption and Transparency Collection
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Monitoring and Evaluation in the United States Government

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Pfeiffer, John R.
Mark, Katharine
Keywords
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
INFORMATION PRODUCTS
IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
LEADERSHIP
EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT
DATA COLLECTION
ACTION FRAMEWORK
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
ACCOUNTABILITY
E DEVELOPMENT
DATA ANALYSIS
POLICE
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
DISCUSSION FORUMS
INTEGRITY
ATTRIBUTION
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
DONATIONS
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
TELEPHONE
CUSTOMER SERVICE
RECOGNITION
FRAUD
INITIATIVE
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
E PRACTICES
SOCIAL SECURITY
AGING
HOMELAND SECURITY
BEST PRACTICES
NETWORKS
ACTION PLANS
PUBLIC AGENCIES
PROGRAMS
GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY
CAPACITY BUILDING
HUMAN SERVICES
PROCUREMENT
DATA SOURCES
PROBLEM SOLVING
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
DETAILED INFORMATION
PROTOCOLS
SERVICE QUALITY
TARGETS
SERVICE DELIVERY
ONE-STOP SHOP
LEARNING
DECISION-MAKING
CIVIL SOCIETY
INNOVATION
PUBLIC FUNDS
PRIVATE SECTOR
PUBLIC POLICY
WEB SITE
COLLECTION OF DATA
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
TRANSPARENCY
CONFIDENCE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
DECISION MAKERS
TRIALS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
INFORMATION SHARING
WEB
USER
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS
ATTENTION
INTERNAL GOVERNMENT
INVENTORY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
HABITS
TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC INFORMATION
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
CAPABILITIES
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
ACHIEVEMENT
PUBLIC ACCESS
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERS
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
E-MAIL
HUMAN CAPITAL
CREATIVITY
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
COLLABORATION
ABUSE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
INVESTIGATIONS
VIDEO
LAWS
CITIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
RESULT
EARLY CHILDHOOD
CIVIL SERVANTS
PDF
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/93454
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26684
Abstract
This report is divided into five parts.
 Following this introduction, Section two provides an
 overview of the institutions and most important features in
 the landscape of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) at the
 federal level in the United States. Section three detailed
 the actual systems for performance M&E that is now in
 place in the Executive Branch and coordinated (or led) by
 the office of management and budget, including a look at
 their evolution and expected future trends. The focus is on
 the executive system, because it directly supports
 management and budgeting decisions, and because it provides
 a key basis for evaluation and research conducted by other
 agencies (such as the U.S. Government Accountability Office,
 or GAO and Congressional Budget Office, or CBO). Section
 four discusses the strengths and particular challenges faced
 by these systems, and section five concludes the report with
 lessons that may be useful to other countries.
Date
2011-10
Type
Working Paper
Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/26684
978-1-60244-198-9
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26684
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGO
Collections
Corruption and Transparency Collection

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Right to Information

    Trapnell, Stephanie E.; Trapnell, Stephanie E. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-08-20)
    This first round of eight case studies was completed in 2012. The case studies were prepared examining the experience of a number of countries that have passed Right to Information (RTI) legislation within the last 15 years: Albania, India, Mexico, Moldova, Peru, Romania, Uganda, and the United Kingdom. Each country case study assesses four dimensions critical to the effective implementation of RTI legislation as follows: 1. The scope of the information that the law covers, which determines whether an RTI law can serve as the instrument of more transparent and accountable governance as envisaged by its advocates. For example, a law that leaves too many categories of information out of its purview, that does not adequately apply to all agencies impacting public welfare or using public resources, or that potentially contradicts with other regulations, like secrecy laws, will not be effective. 2. Issues related to public sector capacity and incentives, additional key functions and demands within the public sector created by RTI, entities responsible for these functions, and various organizational models for fulfilling these functions. 3. Mechanisms for appeals and effective enforcement against the denial of information(whether it be an independent commission or the judiciary); the relative independence, capacity, and scope of powers of the appeals agency, and the ease of the appeals process; and the application of sanctions in the face of unwarranted or mute refusals, providing a credible environment. 4. The capacity of civil society and media groups to apply the law to promote transparency and to monitor the application of the law, and a regulatory and political environment that enables these groups to operate effectively. The in-depth research presented in these case studies was conducted to examine factors that promote the relative effectiveness of these four key dimensions when implementing RTI reforms, including institutional norms, political realities, and economic concerns. An analysis was conducted to determine which models have the potential to work in different contexts and what lessons can be drawn from these experiences to help countries currently in the process of setting up RTI regimes.
  • Thumbnail

    Public-Private Partnerships in e-Government : Knowledge Map

    Institute for Public-Private Partnerships (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-07-23)
    The last few years have seen
 considerable research and applications in the areas of
 Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) and electronic-government
 (e-government). Rather than attempting to redefine these
 areas, or considering them as two distinct paradigms, the
 authoring of this Knowledge Map (KM) and its accompanying
 Handbook is an effort to bring a certain degree of
 convergence, and see whether PPPs are, or can be, effective
 instruments for e-government initiatives in a country. The
 increasing emphasis on e-government is often directly
 attributed to the fact that the use and application of
 Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) are now
 commonly accepted as powerful engines for economic growth.
 As governments embrace ICT as a means to accelerate the
 development process this also becomes foremost in the
 reforms agenda, and in their delivery of services to
 citizens, businesses, civil society organizations, and other
 government agencies. This 'public-private partnerships
 in e-government: knowledge map' is designed to be an
 introductory guide to PPPs for public officials responsible
 for e-government initiatives. It is for those who are
 seeking to enhance the quality, efficiency, and
 affordability of those initiatives by employing PPPs.
  • Thumbnail

    Proactive Transparency

    Darbishire, Helen (2010-09-14)
    This paper identifies four primary
 drivers of proactive disclosure throughout history. The
 first is the need to inform the public about laws and
 decisions and the public's right to be informed, to
 know their rights and obligations. The second is the
 public's demand for the information needed to hold
 governments accountable both at and between elections. The
 third is the demand for information in order to participate
 actively in decision-making. The fourth is the provision to
 the public of information needed to access government
 services, which has expanded significantly in the past
 decade with growth of electronic access to services or
 'e-government.' This paper attempts to advance the
 debate around that question by analyzing the multiple
 proactive disclosure provisions in national law and
 international treaties in order to identify the emerging
 global consensus on the classes of information which should
 be included in a proactive disclosure regime. The paper
 examines the practical challenges related to the
 implementation of proactive disclosure regimes and some of
 the lessons learned from which principles for making
 proactive disclosure work in practice can be derived. It
 concludes by identifying some future challenges and areas
 where additional research is needed.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.