Author(s)
Operations Evaluation DepartmentKeywords
BORROWERDEREGULATION
MACROECONOMIC CRISES
REVENUES
ENVIRONMENT
INCOME LEVELS
INTERNATIONAL INVESTORS
LABOR MARKETS
INCENTIVES
UNEMPLOYMENT
DIVISION OF LABOR
CONDITIONALITY
TRADE
EXPENDITURES
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
CROWDING OUT
PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT
MARKET ECONOMIES
INTERNATIONAL BANK
SECURITIES
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
POLITICAL ECONOMY
PROFIT
PRIVATE PROPERTY
DEBT
ECONOMIES
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
BARRIERS TO ENTRY
FINANCE
PROPERTY RIGHTS
LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
TAX REFORM
BENEFIT ANALYSIS
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
FISHERIES
MINES
OIL PRICES
ECONOMIC POLICIES
POVERTY
TARIFFS
PROFITS
GUARANTEE
LABOR FORCE
DIRECT INVESTMENT
EFFICIENCY
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INVESTOR
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
TRANSACTION
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
SOCIAL COSTS
MACROECONOMIC CRISIS
SHARE
VALUES
LAND
ECONOMIC GROWTH
INVESTING
CAPITAL MARKETS
OIL
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
SUSTAINABLE USE
INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR
INSTRUMENTS
PUBLIC DEBT
ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTMENT CLIMATES
REVENUE
TRANSACTION COSTS
RESOURCES
WAGES
HOLDING
CREDIT RATIONING
MACROECONOMIC CONDITIONS
QUOTAS
PORTFOLIO
NATURAL RESOURCES
CDF
ECONOMISTS
RESOURCE USE
EMERGING MARKETS
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
JUDICIAL REFORM
ECONOMICS
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
MARKET
SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
COMPLIANCE COSTS
COMMERCIAL BANKS
LOAN PORTFOLIO
FARMS
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
LOAN
TRANSPARENCY
SUBSIDIES
EXCHANGE
MARKETS
PROPERTY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
LAND USE
OPTIONS
TAX REFORMS
INTERNATIONAL INVESTOR
PUBLIC GOODS
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
ECONOMIC IMPACT
MACROECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
TAXES
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
EXPECTATIONS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
LABOR COSTS
COMPETITION
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
INVESTORS
LIVING CONDITIONS
FINANCIAL STABILITY
PRICES
FINANCIAL CRISIS
DEBT MANAGEMENT
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
GOOD
AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT
LENDING
EQUITY
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
COMPETITIVE MARKETS
INVESTMENT
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
ENVIRONMENTS
TRANSACTIONS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
TRANSITION ECONOMIES
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
TAX RATES
NET WORTH
MODELS
MARKET LIBERALIZATION
EFFECTIVE USE
COUNTRY RISK
CREDIT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24109Abstract
The Investment Climate Study is a
 evaluation of the Operations Evaluation Department (OED).
 The OED report reviews the Bank’s investment climate lending
 and non-lending activities during fiscal years 1993 through
 2002-03. The report presents the collected findings of
 several evaluative exercises: a literature review; an
 analysis of investment climate themes in country assistance
 strategies and sector strategies; an analysis of lending
 operations as well as economic and sector work including
 survey-based diagnostic assessments; discussions with groups
 of international investors as well as with Bank staff; and
 client consultations and country case studies for five
 countries of Indonesia, Romania, India, Mozambique, and
 Peru. The key lessons learned are as follows: (i) the Bank’s
 non-lending intellectual and coordinating contributions can
 be as important as its financial contributions; (ii)
 institutional weaknesses in the form of administrative and
 regulatory barriers and poor property rights, as well as
 inadequate infrastructure and capability problems in public
 administration and private business, can continue to
 constrain growth; (iii) reform efforts must be coupled with
 a convincing analysis of the costs and benefits of reform,
 together with an exercise to set reform priorities, capacity
 building to address weaknesses of executing agencies, and
 efforts on the ground to achieve political consensus and
 commitment by government leaders to adopt and implement
 required reforms; (iv) partial programs may fall well short
 of achieving their objectives; (v) in cases where
 comprehensive reform programs are politically impossible,
 greater effort may be needed to prioritize what needs to be
 fixed first and what needs to be worked on in the longer
 run; (vi) reform efforts need people on the ground to help
 build required political commitment; and (vii) there may be
 a need for interventions to assist firms in these areas by
 way of vocational and in-firm training and cost-sharing
 subsidies for technology transfer to increase the
 possibilities for a growth response to investment climate
 reforms. The OED evaluation concludes with the following
 recommendations to improve Bank support for investment
 climate reforms: (i) pay more attention to institutions and
 the political economy of reform; (ii) improve the focus and
 use of survey-based diagnostics; (iii) do a better job of
 prioritizing and packaging investment climate reforms in
 lending operations; and (iv) find organizational solutions
 that help integrate microeconomic and macroeconomic reform agendas.Date
2016-04-21Type
EvaluationIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/24109http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24109
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Investment Law ReformWorld Bank Group (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-10-19)The chief purpose of this handbook is to
 provide government lawyers with a framework to evaluate the
 quality of a country's investment legislation (if it
 exists) and how the legislation relates to its investment
 policy and investment incentives. More specifically, it
 deals with creating new and reforming existing investment
 legislation in developing and transition economies in
 furtherance of the World Bank Group's (WBG's)
 mandate to promote private investment - domestic and foreign
 - in those economies. Handbook appendices contain drafting
 guidelines and checklist of issues that foreign direct
 investment (FDI) laws should include and that countries can
 use when drafting investment legislation. The report is
 structured as follows: chapter one defines key terms about
 investment law reform in an effort to clarify terminology
 and concepts and show how they are related. Chapter two
 examines how widespread investment codes are and explains
 their utility and limitations. Chapter three provides
 recommendations on the structure of investment legislation
 and the key provisions to be included such as definitions,
 investors' guarantees, incentives, framework for
 investment promotion, and transitional provisions. Chapter
 four discusses the fundamental issue of investor entry, in
 particular the conditions under which foreign investors can
 invest including sectoral restrictions, limitations on
 foreign ownership, authorization and screening, minimum
 investment, and performance requirements. Chapter five
 discusses key investor guarantees including fair and
 equitable treatment, national treatment, most-favored-nation
 (MFN) treatment, protection against expropriation,
 guaranteed convertibility and repatriation of profits, and
 settlement of disputes. Chapter six looks at the issue of
 investment incentives, (fiscal incentives in particular) and
 their effectiveness. Chapter seven summarizes key aspects of
 investment promotion to guide legal drafters, should
 policymakers want the investment code to set out the basic
 framework of investment promotion. Chapter eight presents
 the various phases of investment law reform projects, from
 the government's request for assistance with
 legislation to the delivery of a project plan. Chapter nine
 identifies some of the challenges in preparing an investment
 code and the support that governments may need until the law
 is promulgated. Chapter ten discusses the monitoring and
 evaluation (M and E) of investment law reforms, including
 the key indicators involved in a desk review and medium- and
 large-scale projects.
-
New Voices in Investment : A Survey of Investors from Emerging CountriesKenyon, Thomas; Margalit, Yotam; Reis, Jose Guilherme; Gomez-Mera, Laura; Varela, Gonzalo (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2015)One out of every three dollars invested
 abroad in 2012 was originated in multinationals from
 developing countries. This study sheds light on the
 characteristics, motivations, strategies, and needs of
 emerging market investors. By including information on
 investors, potential investors, and non-investors, the study
 identifies differentiating factors among them that are
 associated with investment decisions. Results show that
 emerging market investors are active players in
 international trade markets; they operate predominantly in
 manufacturing, and are publicly listed and larger than
 non-investors. They exhibit a strong regional bias: they
 invest more heavily in neighbors and in other countries in
 their own regions. Outward FDI from emerging markets is
 primarily market-seeking. Expanding regional and host
 markets emerged as the most important factor influencing the
 location of investments. However, emerging markets'
 firms face binding costs of investing in distant, culturally
 dissimilar markets, resulting, in practice in a trade-off
 between market size and market familiarity. Transaction
 costs associated with geographical and cultural differences
 have a greater impact on services sector firms that exhibit
 a stronger regional bias. Bilateral investment treaties
 (BITs) partly offset these costs associated with investing
 in faraway and/or unfamiliar markets. In addition,
 international trade agreements increase the perceived
 attractiveness of a host country to potential investors.
 Political factors constitute binding constraints that deter
 emerging markets' firms from investing in developing
 markets. Yet, investors value political stability and
 transparency more than corruption control, fair and regular
 elections, and risk of expropriation in the host country.
 IPAs play only a marginal role in raising awareness of
 investment opportunities in developing countries, and may be
 particularly ineffective in many African countries.
 Nevertheless, IPAs appear to be a widely used and useful
 resource for investors once they have made the decision to
 enter a specific market. IPA services tend to be more
 valuable for smaller and less productive firms. Overall, the
 new TNCs from emerging economies do not appear to differ
 dramatically from their predecessors from developed and
 developing countries in previous waves of OFDI. Results
 suggest that to attract FDI from emerging economies,
 countries need to maintain market-friendly, liberal trade
 and investment policies. In addition, joining international
 trade and investment agreements can be benefitial to reduce
 transaction costs associated with cross border investment.
 Countries also need to provide a stable and predictable
 political and institutional environment. Last and not least,
 it is important to revamp IPAs and increase their
 effectiveness in raising awareness of investment
 opportunities and meeting investors' needs.
-
Attracting Foreign Direct Investment : What Can South Asia's Lack of Success Teach Other Developing Countries?Tan, Congyan; Sadeghi Emamgholi, Amir S.; Gould, David M. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-11)Like many other developing countries,
 South Asian nations have been experiencing increased foreign
 direct investment inflows over the past decade as developing
 countries get a larger share of cross-border investments
 that were once sent to developed countries. Nonetheless,
 South Asia's inflows of foreign direct investment
 remain the lowest relative to gross domestic product among
 developing country regions. Why are South Asia's
 foreign direct investment inflows so low and what lessons
 can be drawn for developing countries as a whole? The
 analysis in this paper uses a novel empirical model that
 accounts for possible trends in convergence in the ratio of
 foreign direct investment to gross domestic product between
 countries and cross-sectional data for 78 countries from
 2000 to 2011. The sample contains 52 developing countries.
 The analysis finds that two key factors are at work -- high
 overall regulatory restrictions on foreign direct investment
 and specific restrictions placed on doing business with
 other countries. These factors include overall trade
 restrictiveness, which reduces the benefits to cross-border
 investments, and weak institutions to protect foreign
 investors and facilitate investment. Nonetheless, the
 potential for faster growth in intra- and inter-regional
 foreign direct investment flows is significant. The main
 factors leading to this conclusion are South Asia's
 current low levels of foreign direct investment, the many
 unexploited opportunities for embodied knowledge transfer,
 and supply-chain linkages. The overall lessons for
 developing countries are that liberalizing policy
 constraints in both trade and foreign investment, keeping
 corporate tax rates modest, and improving governance and
 transparency could help to substantially improve foreign
 direct investment flows.