Republic of Yemen : Public Expenditure Financial Accountability Assessment
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
FINANCIAL ANALYSISPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
BUDGET CREDIBILITY
BUDGETARY PROCESS
CENTRAL BANK
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
EXPENDITURE POLICY
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX REVENUE
INTERNAL CONTROLS
REFORM STRATEGY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
FISCAL ACCOUNTS
INTERNAL AUDIT
FISCAL INFORMATION
REFORM AGENDA
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
TAX PAYMENTS
OIL PRICES
AGGREGATE BUDGET
PUBLIC SECTOR SPECIALIST
CASH FLOWS
EXPENDITURE CONTROLS
TAX AGENCIES
BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS
REVENUE ESTIMATES
SOCIAL WELFARE
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
REFORM PROCESS
BUDGET LAW
SELF ASSESSMENT
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
BUDGET ENTITY
BUDGET ESTIMATES
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ANNUAL BUDGET
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
PRIVATE CORPORATIONS
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
POLICY DECISIONS
DECISION-MAKING
NATURAL RESOURCES
EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF SERVICES
ACCUMULATION OF ARREARS
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
BUDGET SUBMISSIONS
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
PRIVATE SECTOR
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
FISCAL AGGREGATES
TRANSPARENCY
EXCHANGE RATES
GOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
REFORM EFFORTS
GOVERNMENT POLICY
REFORM PROGRAM
FISCAL ANALYSIS
BUDGET COVERS
ACCOUNTING
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
FINANCE MINISTRY
DEBT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL RELATIONS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DEBT
DEBT SUSTAINABILITY
COUNTRY PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET PROPOSALS
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS
CASH MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNT STRUCTURE
FINANCIAL ASSETS
TAX COLLECTION
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
FINANCIAL STATISTICS
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS
BUDGETARY DATA
BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS
EXPENDITURES
EXTERNAL DEBT
BENEFICIARIES
CASH BASIS
SALARY PAYMENTS
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
BUDGET YEAR
SECTOR CEILINGS
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS
BUDGETING PROCESS
APPROPRIATIONS
BUDGET PREPARATION
INFLATION RATE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
REFORM PRIORITIES
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
FISCAL FORECASTS
EXCHANGE RATE
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
CREDIBLE BUDGET
FISCAL RISK
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
PUBLIC SECTOR EXPENDITURE
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TRACKING
BUDGET FORMULATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE
FISCAL YEARS
INCOME TAX
DOMESTIC REVENUE
CASH ACCOUNTING
GOVERNMENT DEBT
INCOME TAXES
BUDGET POLICY
SERVICE DELIVERY
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
MANAGEMENT CONTROLS
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
PROCUREMENT POLICY
BUDGETARY SYSTEM
BUDGET FORMULATION PROCESS
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
PUBLIC FUNDS
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
GROWTH RATE
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGETS
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
FINANCE STAFF
COUNTRY PROCUREMENT
BUDGET EXECUTION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE DATA
EDUCATION SERVICES
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL POLICY
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION
ARTICLE
AGGREGATE FISCAL
FINANCIAL AUDITS
EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNMENT
CASH BALANCES
BUDGETARY OUTCOMES
BUDGET SUPPORT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BUDGET CYCLE
PUBLIC CORPORATIONS
BUDGET SUBMISSION
INFLATION
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
AUDIT FINDINGS
BUDGETARY OPERATIONS
PUBLIC FINANCE
DONOR FUNDS
EXCHANGE RESERVES
AGGREGATE REVENUE
ADMINISTRATIVE CLASSIFICATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
BUDGET STRUCTURE
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12670Abstract
This Public Expenditure and Financial
 Accountability (PEFA) assessment was sponsored by the World
 Bank. The terms of reference were reviewed by the Government
 and all donors active in supporting public finance
 management in Yemen. It has been undertaken in agreement
 with the Government of Yemen and with the assistance of the
 Ministry of Finance. The assessment was prepared on the
 basis of: 1) The public financial management performance
 measurement framework issued by the PEFA multi-donor program
 in June 2005; and 2) The demonstrated observable public
 finance management (PFM) practices in Yemen at the time of
 the assessment as determined through interviews and reviews
 and analysis of translated official documents. Corroborating
 evidence was sought from a variety of sources wherever
 possible. Discussions were held with stakeholders to
 determine the appropriate scoring for each indicator. A
 field mission exit workshop and a final review workshop of
 the indicator scorings issued in the draft report were held
 in which a full representation of Government officials and
 donors actively participated. Final discussions were held
 with Government officials and additional documentation
 reviewed for indicators for which differences of opinion
 remained. All comments received were carefully considered
 and used to clarify further or amend the draft report. The
 purpose of the PFM Performance Report is to assess the
 status of the public finance management system at a given
 point in time. It should serve as a comprehensive and
 holistic measure of current PFM systems operating in Yemen
 identifying both areas of strength and weakness.Date
2008-06Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/12670http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12670
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
The Great Crisis and Fiscal Institutions in Eastern and Central Europe
 and Central AsiaSanchez, Luis Alvaro; Barbone, Luca; Islam, Roumeen (2012-03-19)This paper examines fiscal outcomes in
 Eastern and Central European countries before and during the
 global crisis of 2008-2010. These outcomes are evaluated in
 the context of overall changes in fiscal institutions and
 global market conditions. Eastern and Central European
 countries situations improved dramatically in the
 pre-crisis period as tax revenues boomed, and fiscal
 institutions were reformed. Expenditures increased quite
 significantly in real terms for some of the countries in the
 pre-crisis era so that when tax revenues collapsed in the
 wake of the crisis, the countries were left with large
 deficits. Institutional reform helped countries manage their
 fiscal situations better, but the crisis also exposed
 shortcomings of the status quo. In the post-crisis period,
 fiscal institutions aimed at promoting fiscal discipline are
 being strengthened. Governments will also need to take a
 closer look at the sustainability of current expenditure
 patterns, particularly the strong emphasis on social expenditures.
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.