Western Balkans - Public Investment Management Study : Main Report
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
CAPITAL PROJECTSTOTAL PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
LOCAL MARKET
ACCOUNTABILITY
EXPENDITURE FORECASTS
BUDGETARY PROCESS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
ANNUAL BUDGET PREPARATION
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FOREIGN FINANCING
QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
CAPITAL BUDGET
FISCAL ADJUSTMENTS
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
BUDGETARY TREATMENT
VALUATION
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
MONETARY TERMS
CAPITAL SPENDING
NATIONAL INVESTMENT
COST EFFECTIVENESS
ALLOCATION
INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES
PUBLIC MONEY
EXPENDITURE BUDGET
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
EXTERNAL FINANCING
EXPENDITURE PLAN
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTION
CAPITAL BUDGETING
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
REVENUE FORECASTING
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
HOLDING
ANNUAL BUDGET
NATIONAL AUTHORITIES
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
NATIONAL STRATEGY
ANNUAL BUDGETS
FINANCIAL CAPACITY
DECISION-MAKING
EXPENDITURE DECISIONS
PUBLIC CAPITAL
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
INVESTMENT FUNDS
POVERTY REDUCTION
BUDGET SUBMISSIONS
DECISION-MAKERS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
BID
PRIVATE SECTOR
EX POST ASSESSMENT
TRANSPARENCY
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
REFORM EFFORTS
PRESENT VALUE
MARKET PRICES
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC GOODS
GOVERNMENT POLICY
MARKET TRANSACTIONS
PERFORMANCE TARGETS
HUMAN RESOURCES
MEDIUM-TERM PLAN
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
MEDIUM-TERM PERSPECTIVE
FINANCES
COUNTRY ECONOMISTS
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
ACCOUNTING
DONOR FINANCING
EXPROPRIATION
FINANCE MINISTRY
FINANCIAL CRISIS
LEGAL RECOURSE
PUBLIC SERVICES
QUALITY CONTROL
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
INSTRUMENT
REVENUE INCREASES
TREASURY SYSTEMS
PUBLIC SECTOR
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
PERFORMANCE AUDITS
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
ANNUAL BUDGETING
FINANCIAL STATISTICS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
CONCESSION ARRANGEMENTS
BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS
EXPENDITURES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
EXPENDITURE PLANS
EXPENDITURE PLANNING
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES
BENEFICIARIES
AID-DEPENDENT COUNTRIES
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
TOTAL PUBLIC SPENDING
BUDGET YEAR
DOMESTIC MARKET
BUDGETING PROCESS
BUDGET SYSTEM
BUDGET PREPARATION
ANNUAL TRANCHES
BUDGET PROCESS
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
PUBLIC SERVICE
DONOR COORDINATION
INVESTMENT DECISION
DISCOUNT RATE
SOCIAL SECURITY
EXPENDITURE CEILINGS
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
COST ESTIMATES
INVESTMENT BUDGET
TREASURY SYSTEM
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
BUDGET COVERAGE
CHECKS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
LABOR MARKET
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
FINANCE MINISTRIES
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
BUDGETARY SYSTEMS
MONEY TERMS
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
CENTRAL AGENCIES
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
ACCOUNTABILITY ARRANGEMENTS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
EXPENDITURE PRIORITIES
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
TREASURY
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
CAPITAL ASSETS
BUDGET EXECUTION
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
INVESTMENT FINANCING
BUDGET PLANNING
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
FISCAL RISKS
COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT
FINANCIAL AUDITS
SOCIAL PROJECTS
ANNUAL BUDGET CYCLE
BUDGET CYCLE
FIXED ASSET
RESOURCE CEILINGS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
VALUATION TECHNIQUES
INFLATION
PUBLIC RESOURCES
LINES OF ACCOUNTABILITY
INVESTMENT PROJECTS
DONOR FUNDS
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
TRUST FUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURE
BUDGET HOLDERS
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
PUBLIC BUDGETS
CREDIBILITY
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
ORGANIC BUDGET LAW
ASSET VALUES
PUBLIC SPENDING
FIXED ASSETS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISIONS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2901Abstract
This report summarizes the findings of a
 review of public investment management (PIM) practices in
 the Western Balkans carried out with an eye to improving
 practices over the medium term, sharing experiences on a
 regional basis, providing some initial specific
 recommendations and identifying areas for more intensive
 further analysis. Following this introduction, the second
 section of the main report examines capital expenditure
 trends in the study countries. The third section provides an
 overview of the findings across the six countries. The
 fourth section provides potential drill-down topics for the
 further analysis. The fifth and final section briefly
 outlines the methodology used in the individual country
 studies. The study has revealed frequent weaknesses in the
 institutional arrangements for public investment management,
 although in most cases things are moving in the right
 direction. Box one set out some stylized guidelines on good
 practice for institutional arrangements for public
 investment management, based on what is commonly found in
 OECD countries. The box describes systems involving a
 single, integrated budgeting process for capital and
 recurrent expenditure, within which capital expenditure is
 clearly distinguished from current expenditure because of
 its particular characteristics.Date
2012-03-19Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Investment ReviewIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2901http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2901
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Uganda - Strengthening the Effectiveness of the Public Investment Program : Public Expenditure ReviewWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-02-13)To advance the effectiveness of Uganda's public investment program (PIP) improvements can and should be made from the inception of an investment program all the way through its implementation. It is not a question of abandoning the current process but one of adjusting the various stages of the current PIP processes in place such that in particular quality at entry and readiness of investment projects improves, contract management gets strengthened, and above all incentives for implementation are enhanced. The aim of the adjustments to the PIP processes in Uganda is to ensure that the PIP can assist the government to direct resources to those investments that provide the highest economic and social return. The government is advised to revisit the current informational content of the PIP as well as the decision making process of the PIP at each of the phases of the PIP, i.e., preparation, evaluation, and implementation. The remainder of the executive summary will discuss how this can potentially be accomplished. Uganda's economy has grown rapidly over the past 20 years propelled by consistent policy reforms. Annual growth in real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has averaged 7.4 percent over the 10 years ending in 2009/10, compared with 6.5 percent recorded in the 1990s. This acceleration was in spite of consecutive exogenous shocks including: the oil price shock; drought conditions with adverse effects on energy generation and agricultural production; and volatile food prices.
-
Improving Public Expenditures in AgricultureAmponsah, Kofi; Annor-Frempong, Charles (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-12-15)The objective of the agricultural sector public expenditure review (AgPER) was to examine the
 efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural sector expenditures in Mongolia. The AgPER provides policy makers with a better understanding of: (a) trends in the level and
 composition of public expenditures in agriculture over the past five to ten years; (b) the economic
 and functional composition of agriculture expenditures; (c) the budget processes and performance in
 the agriculture sector; (d) issues inhibiting the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditures in
 agriculture.
-
Kyrgyz Republic Public Expenditure Review Policy Notes : Public Investment ManagementWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-05)Weaknesses in the public investment
 management (PIM) system may limit the gains from higher
 public sector investments in the Kyrgyz Republic. Capital
 spending has averaged 6.4 percent of GDP since 2010, up from
 4.6 percent of GDP between 2005 and 2009, with significant
 investment in the energy sector and roads. Still, it remains
 unclear to what extent these investment decisions reflect
 the country's and sector priorities. Few projects,
 with the exception of donor-financed projects are subject to
 rigorous appraisal and there is no systematic procedure in
 place to monitor implementation progress. As a result,
 projects are often delayed or stalled and cost over-runs are
 frequent. Donor-financed projects, which comprise the bulk
 of public investment, are subject to relatively more
 rigorous project cycle management; however, they too face
 some of the same weaknesses. The rest of the note is
 structured as follows: section two provides a diagnosis of
 the public investment portfolio, including the structure of
 expenditures, the quality of the data, and a quantitative
 assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of the public
 investment portfolio. The assessment builds on previous work
 on public investment in the Kyrgyz Republic, in particular
 the Public Investment Diagnostic undertaken in 2012 under
 the Capacity Building in Economic Management (CBEM) project.
 Section three reviews the institutional and administrative
 framework of PIM in Kyrgyz Republic. This draws largely
 from the draft Investment Diagnostic Report prepared in
 December 2012 using the eight key 'must-have'
 features of a well-functioning public investments framework
 proposed in Rajaram et.al. (2011). Finally, section four
 includes a summary of the findings and detailed
 recommendations on improving PIM.