Romania : Local Social Services Delivery Study, Volume 1. Summary Report
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
COMMUNISTFISCAL CONDITIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTONOMY
LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
ACCOUNTABILITY
CONSTITUTIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
CITIZENS
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENT
REVENUE SOURCES
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
BORROWING COSTS
PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS
LACK OF CLARITY
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
NATIONAL LEVEL
PUBLIC SERVICE PROVISION
TRANSPORT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENTS
TAX
POVERTY ALLEVIATION MECHANISMS
DECISION MAKING
LOCAL SPENDING
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
CAPACITY BUILDING
EXECUTION
HOUSING
BONDS
PROVISIONS
AUTHORITY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
PROPERTY TAX BASE
LOCAL REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
CIVIL SOCIETY
SOCIAL BENEFITS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BORROWING
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES
LOCAL PUBLIC FINANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES
LEGISLATION
FISCAL
TRANSPARENCY
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
AUTONOMY
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
FISCAL CONSOLIDATION
FISCAL DEFICIT
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
PENSIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
SOCIAL STRUCTURES
CASH BENEFITS
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
REVENUE MEASURES
CURRENT EXPENDITURES
QUALITY STANDARDS
MUNICIPALITIES
PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL EQUALIZATION
CITIES
DECONCENTRATION
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
LEGAL AUTHORITY
TAX COLLECTION
FISCAL EFFICIENCY
ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS
PUBLIC WORKS
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY
SOCIAL INSURANCE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
COMPULSORY EDUCATION
DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
COLLATERAL
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
SOCIAL SECTOR
LOCAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
SOCIAL SECTORS
FISCAL CRISIS
PUBLIC SERVICE
FISCAL CAPACITY
UTILITIES SOCIAL SERVICE DELIVERY
STATE BUDGET
LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
EMPLOYMENT
DEVOLUTION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
TAX SHARING
CASH COMPENSATIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TAXATION
EDUCATIONAL POLICY
EDUCATION SECTOR
GOVERNMENT BORROWING
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
LOCAL TAXES
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
EXPENDITURE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM
FINANCIAL MARKETS
PUBLIC POLICY
LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
MUNICIPALITY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
POLICY REFORM
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
FINANCING SOURCES
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
LOCAL COUNCILS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
INFLATION
PUBLIC RESOURCES
FIXED COSTS
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
LOCAL FINANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CAPACITY
PUBLIC FINANCE
SOCIAL SERVICES
INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS
BORROWING POWER
CREDIT MARKETS
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
SOCIAL SOLIDARITY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL FRAMEWORK
UNFUNDED MANDATES
TAX RATES
LOCAL AUTHORITY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCING
PUBLIC SPENDING
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15436Abstract
The study seeks to identify
 institutional, and procedural factors which may facilitate,
 or hamper the effectiveness of social services, and
 inter-governmental fiscal arrangements. Based on existing
 research on decentralization, the success of decentralized
 service delivery depends on factors, that include the
 quality of intergovernmental institutions, a stable fiscal
 framework, and a well established civil society, and social
 structure. The study focuses on public social services,
 where local governments play the greatest role, and,
 throughout the report, the greatest emphasis is on social
 assistance benefits, and services, addressing those cash
 benefits which are delivered, and financed by local
 governments, including national programs such as birth
 grants, emergency assistance, and the main poverty
 alleviation program. In education, the study focuses on
 compulsory, and secondary education, though it does not
 address specialized secondary education, which is under the
 purview of central ministries. The study comprises two
 volumes: volume 1 provides an overview of the issues,
 summarizes major findings, and presents policy options;
 volume 2 includes the detailed discussion, and analysis, and
 presents the empirical underpinnings of the report. The
 study finds that fiscal decentralization of poverty
 alleviation benefits, has undermined its effectiveness, and
 eroded social safety nets; thus the government is preparing
 the Minimum Income Guarantee Program Law to centralize
 financing of social assistance cash benefits. And, education
 seems to be the policy area with greatest potential for
 further decentralization, suggesting a careful capacity
 evaluation to decide whether to attain complete autonomy.Date
2002-01-16Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15436http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15436
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Decentralization, Accountability and Local Services in Sierra Leone : Situation Analysis, Key Challenges and Opportunities for ReformWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-04-15)Following years of civil war that ended
 in 2002, Sierra Leone has pursued a policy of
 decentralization, devolving responsibility for many
 government functions to the Local Council level. The aims of
 this policy include achieving a more equitable and inclusive
 access to public services across the national territory, in
 part to alleviate regional inequities that contributed to
 the civil war. The implementation of the decentralization
 policy has faced many obstacles, however, including the need
 to rebuild local government institutions and capacity after
 30 years of centrally dominated governance; the limited
 devolution of financial resources; and multifaceted
 political economy hurdles. This report, first, analyzes the
 current state of decentralization in Sierra Leone; second,
 identifies the most prominent challenges to continued
 decentralization; and, third, discusses options for the way
 forward. The report draws on qualitative and quantitative
 data collected from both central and local government
 stakeholders, and takes the perspective that
 decentralization and strengthened local governance
 institutions are an effective means to localize development
 and improve the effective and equitable delivery of key
 public services. The study focuses on progress to date and
 standing challenges in four key areas of analysis: fiscal
 decentralization, human resource decentralization, ensuring
 inclusivity and accountability in local governance, and
 ensuring efficiency and responsiveness in service delivery.
-
Kyrgyz Republic Public Expenditure Review Policy Notes : Intergovernmental Fiscal RelationsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-08-14)Intergovernmental fiscal relations have
 advanced over the last decade in the Kyrgyz Republic. Since
 the previous public expenditure review in 2004, the
 government of the Kyrgyz Republic has developed a number of
 policy changes in the area of intergovernmental fiscal
 relations. These policy changes helped the country to
 introduce a more transparent and equitable system of local
 government financing. Still, effective decentralization
 continues to face challenges. A set of policy
 recommendations for the government to consider are designed
 to clarify the role of local government and provide better
 incentives for improved service delivery. These are based on
 a review of the four pillars of intergovernmental fiscal
 relations in Kyrgyz Republic: (i) the expenditure assignment
 (of who does what); (ii) revenue assignment (with what
 resources) assignment; (iii) the system of transfers; and
 (iv) borrowing. In this context, the report is structured as
 follows: section one gives executive summary. Section two
 provides a brief description of the institutional context in
 terms of the structure of government and the elements of
 political and administrative decentralization. Section three
 analyzes the delineation of expenditure responsibilities
 among government tiers. Section four analyzes revenue
 sources assigned to each tier of government. Section five
 focuses on the system of intergovernmental transfers.
 Section six examines subnational public investments and
 borrowing. In each of these sections main issues and
 problems are identified in the current system and the
 desired directions for reform are pointed out.
-
Intergovernmental Reforms in the
 Russian Federation : One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?Golovanova, Natalia; Kurlyandskaya, Galina; De Silva, Migara O.; Andreeva, Elena (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009)Intergovernmental reforms in the Russian
 Federation: one step forward, two steps back? Is a critical
 analysis of Russia's intergovernmental reform program
 which began in the early 1990s. It assesses the effects of a
 broad range of reforms adopted over two tumultuous decades
 during which the Russian Federation experienced significant,
 and at times drastic, political regime changes, coupled with
 a similarly turbulent economic growth trajectory. This
 environment reshaped intergovernmental relations, requiring
 certain fiscal responsibilities to be delegated to the
 sub-national levels. These reforms, however, were not always
 accompanied by the kinds of administrative and political
 structures required to support a truly devolved system of
 intergovernmental fiscal relations. As this study indicates,
 in recent years there has been a tendency to recentralize
 some powers that had been granted to sub-national
 governments under earlier reforms, a trend that may call
 into question the future of fiscal decentralization in the
 federation. Moreover, the current global economic downturn
 has had a significant effect on Russia' economic
 growth, largely because of the country's overdependence
 on oil, gas, and mineral exports. It is likely that in the
 present economic climate the political regime will be
 inclined to further limit sub-national autonomy.