Achieving Medium Term Expenditure Framework Reform : A Case Study of Korea
Keywords
REFORMSMEDIUM-TERM FISCAL FRAMEWORK
ANNUAL BUDGETING
DEVELOPMENT BANKS
CENTRAL BUDGET
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
DEBTS
EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL BANK
BUDGETARY REFORM
CENTRAL BUDGET OFFICE
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
ANNUAL BUDGETING PROCESS
FISCAL PLANS
BUDGET YEAR
MEDIUM-TERM PROJECTIONS
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
FISCAL BALANCE
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
PUBLIC FINANCES
BUDGET SYSTEM
WITHDRAWAL
BUDGET PREPARATION
COLLECTIVE ACTION
MANAGERS
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
REFORM IMPLEMENTATION
BUDGET PROCESS
INTERNAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
FISCAL REFORM
STRATEGIC PLANNING
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
LINE OF COMMAND
TAX
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
OPERATING COSTS
BUDGET REQUEST
DECISION MAKING
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
MEDIUM-TERM PROJECTION
DEVOLUTION
PUBLIC
SOCIAL WELFARE
REFORM PROGRAMS
REFORM PROCESS
SETTLEMENT
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
BUDGET FORMULATION
BANKING INDUSTRY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
BUDGET DRAFT
NATIONAL FINANCE
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
BUDGET REQUESTS
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
PUBLIC FUND
ANNUAL BUDGET
GOVERNMENT DEBT
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
NATIONAL FISCAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
BUDGETING
ANNUAL BUDGETS
NATIONAL FISCAL MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE BUDGETING
CONSOLIDATION
EXPENDITURE CEILING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
INTERNAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
EXPENDITURE
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE PLAN
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
BUDGETARY PROCESSES
BUDGET FORMULATION PROCESS
PUBLIC FUNDS
AUTOMATIC STABILIZER
ORGANIZATIONAL RESTRUCTURING
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
BUREAUCRATS
TREASURY
PROGRAM EVALUATION
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
TRANSPARENCY
LEGISLATION
DECISION MAKERS
BUDGET EXECUTION
BUDGET ALLOCATION
AUTONOMY
BUDGET BALANCE
BUDGETARY PROGRAMS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REFORM
FISCAL POLICY
ANNUAL BUDGET FORMULATION
HUMAN RESOURCES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORKS
MONETARY FUND
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORKS
LOCAL FINANCE
BUDGET AUTHORITY
PUBLIC FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL CRISIS
TRUST FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SECTOR GOVERNANCE
CREDIBILITY
RETURN
LAWS
PUBLIC SECTOR
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
STATE ENTERPRISES
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
FUND MANAGEMENT
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
DECENTRALIZATION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13154Abstract
A medium-term expenditure framework is
 considered an essential element of public financial
 management reform, and this framework has been adopted in
 many countries. However, in terms of implementation in those
 countries, the medium-term expenditure framework continues
 to present a significant challenge within the budget
 process. This case study provides an inside story of
 medium-term expenditure framework reform in the Republic of
 Korea and offers some suggestive evidence about the impact
 of the reform. Drawing on theories of change management, the
 study explores how actors within the Korean government
 created acceptance of reform needs among relevant
 stakeholders, how they handled various challenges throughout
 the reform, how they built capacity among stakeholders, and
 how they institutionalized the reform measures that were
 consistent with stakeholder incentives. The case highlights
 the following implications: (1) having strong support from
 top decision makers is essential to successful medium-term
 expenditure framework reform; (2) finding ways of
 integrating a medium-term expenditure framework into the
 budget process is critical; and (3) making the framework
 stable and sustainable requires both capacity building of
 relevant stakeholders and significant organizational restructuring.Date
2013-04-11Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/13154http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13154
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Indonesia : Budget Reform Strategy PrioritiesAllen, R.; Kristensen, J.; Lienert, I.; Jacobs, D.; Schiavo-Campo, S.; Eckardt, S. (International Monetory Fund and the World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007-06)This report is designed to assist the
 authorities develop an overall road map for reforming budget
 preparation. A specific focus is on the steps to be taken to
 introduce a medium-term framework for the central
 government's budget and a performance-based budget.
 These reforms require important preconditions to be in
 place, and a substantial change in the culture, incentives
 and behavior of the public service, and are likely to take
 several years to complete. Successive Indonesian governments
 have embarked on various reforms in the budget and public
 financial management system. New laws for governing budget
 and planning processes were adopted during 2003-04, which
 are gradually being implemented. The national development
 planning agency (BAPPENAS) and spending ministries have
 developed strategic government and ministerial plans that
 provide a basis for elaborating the framework for
 performance measurement and evaluation. Reforms are thus
 starting from a secure base and can also take advantage of
 the improved and stable macroeconomic and fiscal conditions,
 including a low fiscal deficit and a declining government
 debt ratio.
-
Strengthening Institutions for the Preparation of Government BudgetsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2011-02)The Government of Zimbabwe (GOZ) faces
 difficult choices in managing the size of its civil service
 wage bill. The Government understands the need to watch the
 escalating wage bill carefully and put in place a strategy
 to steer it to a sustainable level as early as possible.
 Historical and international comparisons suggest that an
 overall wage bill of around 10 percent of GDP should be the
 medium-term target. This note illustrates that Zimbabwe
 could take immediate steps in 2010 and 2011 that will put it
 on the path of a sustainable level of wage bill in the
 medium-term. The focus of efforts to contain the wage bill
 should be on short-term measures because designing and
 implementing a medium-term approach to wage bill management
 would be too challenging in view of prevailing economic
 uncertainty and complex political reality. The note covers
 the staff employed by the Central Government, including
 uniformed services and staff employed by the Grant-in-Aided
 (GIA) institutions. The staff employed by local governments
 and public enterprises are excluded because direct transfers
 from the central budget to local government and public
 enterprises are rather small. (annex A has an outline of the
 institutional aspects of civil service in Zimbabwe). Given
 the paucity of information, the note does not make any
 recommendations specific to the GIA wage bill.
-
Public Financial Management Reform in the Middle East and North Africa : An Overview of Regional Experience - Individual Country CasesWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This report surveys the experience of
 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries on the topic
 of public financial management reform. Drawing upon a
 variety of sources, including Public Expenditure and
 Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessments, country
 financial accountability assessments, public expenditure
 reviews, and other documents and reports, and augmented as
 necessary by interviews with leading reformers, the report
 seeks to address several major questions. How do MENA
 countries compare with other comparable countries at similar
 levels of development with regard to their Public Financial
 Management (PFM) systems and practices? What has been the
 substantive content and thrust of PFM reforms in MENA over
 the last decade? Where have these reforms done well, and
 where have they struggled? What were the key ingredients for
 success or failure? And are there lessons in how these
 reforms were implemented that will be of value to other
 countries and the donor community?