Keywords
CORPORATE LAWLIQUIDITY
DERIVATIVE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
LEGAL PROCEEDING
MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS
NEGOTIATION
EVENT OF DEFAULT
ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY
BANK FAILURES
DEPOSITOR
MINIMUM CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
MANDATES
CLAIMS
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS
OWNERSHIP LINKS
DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUNDS
INVESTMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
FINANCING
LENDER OF LAST RESORT
INTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
CREDITORS’ COMMITTEE
INVESTMENT BANKING
FORCED SALE
JUDGES
FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATES
CREDITORS’ CLAIMS
FOREIGN FIRMS
ASSET
ENFORCEMENT
TREATMENT OF CREDITORS
FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
PAYMENT SYSTEMS
PARTIAL TRANSFER
NATIONAL BUDGET
REPO
GUARANTEES
ASSETS
EVENT OF INSOLVENCY
CREDITOR CONSENTS
FINANCIAL AUTONOMY
CAPITAL MARKETS
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
LIQUIDATORS
BANK SUPERVISION
MERGERS
CREDIT INSTITUTION
DEPOSIT
FINANCIAL MARKET
LOSSES TO CREDITORS
DEPOSITS
RECAPITALIZATION
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS
CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LEGAL REMEDY
FINANCIAL DIFFICULTY
MANAGEMENT OF ASSETS
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
SOLVENT
RESTRUCTURING
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
CREDIT LINES
CREDITORS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LENDER
MARKET PARTICIPANTS
RECOVERY OF LOSSES
BANKING SYSTEM
ASSET MANAGEMENT
INSOLVENT
LOAN PORTFOLIO
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS
LOSSES ON BANKS
DEPOSIT INSURANCE AGENCY
OWNERSHIP
DEPOSIT INSURANCE FUND
ESTATE
LIQUIDATION PROCEEDING
POSSESSION
CREDITOR CLAIMS
CREDITOR APPROVAL
OPEN BANK
CONVERSION OF DEBT
TRANSFER OF ASSETS
INSOLVENCY REGIME
DISTRESSED FIRM
HOLDING COMPANY
CONSUMER PROTECTION
LEGAL PERSONALITY
LIQUIDITY SUPPORT
CAPITAL ADEQUACY
LIQUIDATION
FINANCIAL STABILITY
EQUITY HOLDERS
LIABILITIES
EQUITY
INSURANCE
ALL “LIABILITIES
INSOLVENCY LAW
PRIVATE PARTY
CREDIT GROWTH
SOLVENCY
PREFERENTIAL RIGHTS
INDEMNIFICATION
STAY OF CREDITOR ACTIONS
CLAIMANTS
LAST RESORT
FINANCIAL ASSETS
CONTRACTUAL TERMS
JUDGE
MANDATE
JURISDICTIONS
FINANCIAL REPORTING
COURT ORDER
LEGAL REMEDIES
INSOLVENCIES
DEBT HOLDERS
SALE OF ASSETS
UNSECURED CREDITOR
LIQUIDATION PROCESS
DEBT RESTRUCTURING
SENIOR DEBT
BALANCE SHEET INSOLVENT
ASSET SALES
FOREIGN BANKS
FINANCIAL CONTRACT
BALANCE SHEET
MERGER
DEFAULT
COLLATERAL
CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
GOOD FAITH
LOANS
PRUDENTIAL STANDARDS
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE
REPAYMENT PLAN
LENDER OF LAST RESORT FACILITY
BUDGETS
FRAUD
INTERESTED PARTY
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
VALID CLAIM
REHABILITATION PLAN
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
FINANCE CORPORATIONS
PARENT COMPANY
SUSPENSION OF PAYMENTS
SUPERVISORY POWERS
SUBJECT TO INSOLVENCY
SOUND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INSURANCE COMPANIES
GOING CONCERN
SETTLEMENT
JUDICIAL ACTIONS
SETTLEMENTS
ENCUMBRANCES
UNSECURED CREDITORS
REPAYMENT
CREDIT RISK
LEGAL PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT SYSTEM
BANKING SYSTEM ASSETS
SALARY
JURISDICTION
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
REMEDIES
PAYMENTS
INSOLVENCY ESTATE
BALANCE-SHEET INSOLVENT
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
CREDITS
TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS
BALANCE-SHEET INSOLVENCY
PAYMENT
PUBLIC FUNDS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS
COMMON LAW
DEPOSITORS
LOAN
LIABILITY
DEBT LIABILITIES
FINANCIAL FLOWS
ECONOMIC LOSSES
MANAGEMENT OF LOANS
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY
BUDGET
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
SYSTEM ASSETS
ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS
AMOUNT OF DEBT
SHARE CAPITAL
REMEDY
INSOLVENCY
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INSOLVENCY PROCESSES
COURT PROCEEDINGS
MAJOR ASSET
FINANCIAL SYSTEM
FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATE
FINANCIAL SERVICES
DEPOSIT INSURANCE
HOLDING COMPANIES
CLAIM
LIQUIDATOR
BUSINESS PLAN
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
LEGAL PROTECTIONS
LENDING
CREDITOR ACTIONS
DEPOSIT INSURANCE SYSTEM
INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS
LEGAL POWERS
INVESTMENT
CORPORATE INSOLVENCY LAW
JUDICIAL POWERS
GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL
DERIVATIVES
FINANCIAL CONTRACTS
STAY ON CREDITOR
DEPOSIT LIABILITIES
CREDIT
CREDITOR
EVENT OF LIQUIDATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24273Abstract
At the request of the Colombian
 authorities, the bank resolution regime was assessed against
 the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for
 Financial Institutions (KAs). The assessment was conducted
 by staff of the Financial Stability Board (FSB),
 International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank utilizing
 the draft KA Assessment Methodology (AM). The assessment
 reviewed the resolution regime as of October 2015, and was
 limited to the banking sector, considering only those
 elements of the AM that directly relate to bank resolution
 without assessing those addressing the resolution of
 insurance firms, investment firms and financial market
 infrastructures (FMIs). As a draft methodology was used, the
 findings of the assessment should be viewed as preliminary.
 A central goal of this assessment was to test the draft AM,
 and a future revision of the AM might yield different
 results with respect to the adherence of the Colombian bank
 resolution regime to the KAs. In this light, no ratings were
 assigned in this review. This assessment was the first one
 undertaken in a country that is not a member of the FSB, or
 home to a Global Systemically Important Financial
 Institution (G-SIFI).Date
2016-05-10Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/24273http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24273
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Colombia Detailed Assessment of ObservanceInternational Monetary Fund; World Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-04-25)At the request of the Colombian
 authorities, the bank resolution regime was assessed against
 the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for
 Financial Institutions (KAs). The assessment was conducted
 by staff of the Financial Stability Board (FSB),
 International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank utilizing
 the draft KA Assessment Methodology (AM). The assessment
 reviewed the resolution regime as of October 2015, and was
 limited to the banking sector, considering only those
 elements of the AM that directly relate to bank resolution
 without assessing those addressing the resolution of
 insurance firms, investment firms and financial market
 infrastructures (FMIs). As a draft methodology was used, the
 findings of the assessment should be viewed as preliminary.
 A central goal of this assessment was to test the draft AM,
 and a future revision of the AM might yield different
 results with respect to the adherence of the Colombian bank
 resolution regime to the KAs. In this light, no ratings were
 assigned in this review. This assessment was the first one
 undertaken in a country that is not a member of the FSB, or
 home to a Global Systemically Important Financial
 Institution (G-SIFI).
-
Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor/Debtor Regimes, Revised 2015World Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-12-15)Effective creditor/debtor rights and
 insolvency systems are an important element of financial
 system stability. The World Bank Group accordingly has been
 working with partner organizations to develop principles for
 insolvency and creditor/debtor rights systems. The
 Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor/Debtor
 Rights Systems (the Principles) are a distillation of
 international best practice on design aspects of these
 systems, emphasizing contextual, integrated solutions and
 the policy choices involved in developing those
 solutions.Based on the experience gained from the use of the
 Principles, and following extensive consultations, the
 publication has been thoroughly reviewed and updated in
 2005, 2011 and 2015. The revised Principles contained in
 this document have benefited from wide consultation and,
 more importantly, from the practical experience of using
 them in the context of the Bank’s assessment and operational work.
-
Financial Sector Assessment Program : Malaysia - Core Principles for Effective Deposit Insurance SystemsWorld Bank; International Monetary Fund (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-10-02)This assessment of compliance with the Core Principles for Effective Deposit Insurance Systems (Core Principles) was conducted as a part of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) performed by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank at the request of the Malaysian government. This assessment was conducted by Claire McGuire, Senior Financial Sector Specialist with the World Bank, during a mission to Malaysia from March 27 to April 13, 2012. The assessment was based on a review of relevant laws, regulations and regulatory and supervisory practices related to the conventional banking sector and the operations of PIDM. There has been no experience with bank failures in Malaysia since Perbadanan Insurans Deposit Malaysia (PIDM's) establishment in 2005. As a result the assessment looked at the relevant provisions of the legal framework without consideration of how the laws had been applied in practice or interpreted by the courts. Several weaknesses in the legal framework have been noted in this assessment.