The Urban Development Investment Corporations (UDICs) in Chongqing, China
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
PRICINGDEVELOPMENT BANKS
STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
ACCOUNTABILITY
MANDATES
SAFETY
VEHICLE
HIGHWAYS
TAX REVENUE
EXPRESSWAYS
INTERNAL CONTROLS
INVESTMENTS
STOCK
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE
PROFIT
REVENUE SOURCES
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
HIGHWAY
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
CAPITAL REQUIREMENT
ROAD MAINTENANCE
TRANSPORT
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
TOLL REVENUES
COMPANY LAW
WRITEOFFS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY
GUARANTEE
TRAFFIC SYSTEM
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT
CASH FLOWS
VALUE
INVESTOR
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENTS
TAX
ENTERPRISES
INTERESTS
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK
GUARANTEES
LAND
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
RING ROAD
INVESTMENT RISK
OPERATIONAL REVENUES
PROFITABILITY
LABOR
EXCESS LIQUIDITY
CONTRACT
MILEAGE
FINANCIAL MARKET
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE
CREDITWORTHINESS
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS
RAILWAYS
BOND
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BONDS
HOUSING
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
BUDGETING
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PRICE SETTING
SANITATION
ROAD
DRIVERS
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
SECURITY
INTERNATIONAL RATING AGENCY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
RAIL TRANSPORTATION
PETROLEUM GAS
FINANCIAL RISK
BANKS
MARKET
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION
ASSET MANAGEMENT
TRANSPARENCY
SUBSIDIARIES
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
SUBSIDIES
MARKETS
AMORTIZATION
LAND USE
PROPERTY
BORROWING
REORGANIZATION
FUTURE
INTEREST RATES
GOVERNMENT BONDS
HUMAN RESOURCES
JOINT STOCK COMPANY
FINANCIAL PLANNING
INTANGIBLE
BANKING SECTOR REFORMS
SUBSIDIARY
ACCOUNTING
DEBT MANAGEMENT
HIGHWAY PROJECTS
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP
TAXIS
EQUITY
INSURANCE
OPERATIONAL RISKS
LAND USE POLICIES
MUNICIPALITIES
FINANCIAL DISTRESS
CAPITALS
LOCAL LAWS
PUBLIC SERVICES
CRITERIA
LAWS
INITIATIVES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
AUCTION
LOCAL FEES
INDUSTRY
INTEREST RATE RISK
TRAFFIC LAWS
TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAXES
SECURITIES
ASSET SALES
TRUE
ROAD PROJECTS
FOREIGN BANKS
MARKET DEVELOPMENT
BALANCED BUDGETS
BALANCE SHEET
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
DRIVING
BANKING SECTOR
FINANCE
LOANS
TAX REFORM
ASSET TRANSFERS
BUDGETS
DRAINAGE
TRAINS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
RAIL TRANSPORT
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
TRANSFERS
FINANCING OF INFRASTRUCTURE
URBANIZATION
SHARE
RING ROADS
SECURITIES MARKET
INTEREST
MATURITIES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
INFRASTRUCTURE
RISK
CREDIT RISK
CAPITAL BASE
TAXATION
DEVELOPMENT BANK
SUBSIDY
REVENUE
WAGES
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
PRIMARY MARKET
CURRENT ASSETS
MARKET BORROWING
INFORMATION SYSTEM
ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTS
AUDITING
PROFIT MARGIN
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
GOVERNANCE
SERVICES
DEFICITS
COLLECTIONS
GRANTS
RISK PROFILE
BOND ISSUANCE
TREASURY
RISK CONTROL
TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION
COMMERCIAL BANKS
TRANSPORT TERMINALS
LIABILITY
LOAN
URBAN ROADS
REVENUE ASSIGNMENT
ADB
INTERNATIONAL CREDIT RATING
FINANCING SOURCES
CONTINGENT LIABILITY
TOLL
BUDGET
TRAFFIC
COSTS
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
CAPITAL
DIRECT INVESTMENTS
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
CREDIT RATING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
TAXES
FIXED ASSET
RAILWAY SECTOR
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
PRINCIPAL
WATER SUPPLY
LAND DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
ROADS
COMMERCIAL BANK LOANS
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
TUNNELS
TOLL ROADS
RAILWAY
PROJECTS
GOOD
FINANCIAL WEAKNESS
CASH FLOW
INTEREST RATE
LENDING
INVESTMENT CORPORATION
INVESTMENT CORPORATIONS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
INTERNATIONAL CREDIT
PUBLIC BUDGETS
BANK
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
LIQUIDITY POSITION
VEHICLES
URBAN RAIL
FINANCIAL POLICIES
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
CREDIT
CREDIT RATING AGENCY
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2888Abstract
Urban Development Investment
 Corporations (UDICs) have over the years become the central
 pillar in the local government drive to build infrastructure
 in China, where local governments are not allowed to engage
 in direct market borrowing. UDICs were established during
 the early 1990s when local governments were under great
 pressure to both build municipal infrastructure and to
 reform the role of the government in infrastructure
 development. The UDIC model provided the local governments
 with a corporate government structure to borrow from the
 market and quickly develop infrastructure. They are treated
 as municipal corporations under the Company Law of the
 Peoples' Republic of China (PRC). The law does not
 clarify the relationship between UDICs and the local
 government, including the limits of the financial liability
 of the local governments vis-a-vis UDICs. The Government of
 China (GOC) agencies expect that the World Bank (WB)
 Technical Assistance Report (TAR), based on the detailed
 analysis of the financial operations of a selected UDIC in
 Chongqing, will offer critical technical assistance to the
 Chongqing Municipal Government (CMG), which can also be
 shared with other Chinese cities. The GOC agencies realize
 that this TAR is the first step in the right direction, in
 that it will specifically address the needs of a
 reform-minded municipal government and clarify one UDIC
 model in detail. It is anticipated that similar efforts can
 be undertaken in the coming years with other reform-minded
 and high-priority cities that are employing different models
 of UDIC to finance municipal infrastructure.Date
2012-03-19Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Urban StudyIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2888http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2888
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Ulaanbaatar Financial Self-AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-04-09)The note is part of a broader
 technical assistance program designed to assist the City of
 Ulaanbaatar (UB) to improve its financial management system,
 assess the quality of municipal services provision, and
 mobilize resources from the capital markets to fund urban
 infrastructure. The note reviews factors that may support or
 constrain the rating, ultimately impacting the UB's
 creditworthiness. This assessment comprises of a
 comprehensive review of the city's economic
 fundamentals, institutional framework, fiscal performance,
 debt profile, and governance system. A key component of a
 credit rating comprises a review of the institutional
 framework that governs the city's financial system.
 This includes evaluating the legal framework, regulations,
 and procedures. The review also elucidates the
 jurisdictional parameters across levels of governments
 regarding debt raising and financing, and evaluates the
 overall quality of decision-making. As in a formal rating,
 the assessment also examines the operating environment,
 which is underlined by the sub-sovereign credit rating, and
 the support range, or the sovereign guarantee available to
 UB, if any. The exercise aims to reveal capacity gaps and
 potential areas for strengthening, as well as proposing
 concrete steps to improve the city's creditworthiness.
-
Coping with Urban Fiscal Stress around the WorldDethier, Jean-Jacques (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-11)The economic recession, the end of
 stimulus funding and central government cutbacks, rising
 social costs and aging, and the need for infrastructure
 upgrading for urbanization are putting enormous fiscal
 stress on cities. The financing capacity of municipalities
 is greatly affected because of the decline in the tax base,
 expenditure pressures, and growing and more expensive debt.
 Today's urban fiscal crisis is similar to that
 experienced in the 1970s, but the growing urbanization in
 the world and massive increase in municipal access to
 financial markets create a new context. This paper surveys
 three important topics related to the urban fiscal crisis in
 developed and developing countries: How do cities finance
 themselves? When they have access to financial markets,
 should city managers use loans, own revenues or
 private-public partnerships to pay for municipal
 expenditures? And what are the remedies to municipal fiscal
 crises in case of insolvency?
-
Public-Private Partnerships in Europe and Central Asia : Designing Crisis-Resilient Strategies and Bankable ProjectsMandri-Perrott, Cledan; Cuttaree, Vickram (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This study aims to help governments
 design sustainable Public-Private Partnership (PPP)
 strategies and projects in the context of the changed
 circumstances brought on by the global financial and
 economic crisis that began in the fall of 2008. The study
 analyses the impact and implication of the crisis on PPP
 infrastructure projects across the Europe and Central Asia
 (ECA) region. In the research undertaken for this study, it
 appears that most crisis-specific issues are cross-sectoral,
 therefore requiring cross-sectoral responses. The intended
 audience for this report includes national government
 stakeholders involved in infrastructure financing, including
 Ministries in charge of infrastructure, especially
 transport, energy, and water; state-owned enterprises with
 operational responsibilities, such as road directorates; and
 Ministries of Finance and development banks involved in PPP.
 This report reviewed the region's experience in PPPs in
 infrastructure before and during the financial crisis period
 (from late 2006 to 2010). Since not all ECA countries have
 had successful or ongoing PPP projects during this time, the
 report draws on lessons from Brazil, India, Spain, and the
 United Kingdom, countries with established PPP project
 pipelines to draw on cross-sectoral lessons. The findings
 can be used by countries wishing to start or re-start their
 PPP program following the impact of the recent crisis.
 However, beyond the crisis and its effects, the report can
 also guide future development of sustainable and
 crisis-resilient PPP programs. Most of the analysis
 supporting the report recommendations was undertaken for the
 highway sector and was financed through from a grant from
 the transport research support program. Initially, the
 highway sector was the focus of this study but the scope was
 later widened to include all infrastructure sectors because
 most issues facing highway PPP projects are common to other
 sectors requiring a cross-sectoral approach to PPP.
 Sector-specific strategies for highways have been documented
 in a recent World Bank study.