Pakistan - Tax Policy Report : Tapping Tax Bases for Development - Summary Report
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
STRUCTURAL PROBLEMSTAX PAYERS
INTEREST PAYMENTS
TAXABLE INCOME
BENEFICIARY
TAX RULES
PLEDGES
SAFETY
POLICE
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
TAX LAW
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
FOREIGN OWNED COMPANIES
TAX REVENUE
TAX AVOIDANCE
TAX LEGISLATION
LEVEL PLAYING FIELD
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
FIXED CHARGE
TAX TREATMENTS
AUDITS
CORPORATE TAX RATE
STATUTORY TAX
TRANSPORT
TAXPAYER
DIRECT TAXATION
EFFECTIVE TAX RATES
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX
TAX BASE
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
EXCISE TAXES
TAX EVASION
TAX POLICY
TAX ASSESSMENT
FINANCIAL SECTOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PREFERENTIAL TREATMENTS
CAPACITY BUILDING
SAFETY NETS
TAX POLICIES
TAX LIABILITIES
VOLATILITY
NATIONAL FINANCE
CAPITAL GAINS
TRANSFER TAXES
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
ROAD
SMALL BUSINESSES
VEHICLE TAXES
INCOME GROUPS
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
TAX EXEMPTIONS
TAX CREDITS
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
FEDERAL TAX
TRANSPARENCY
MOTOR VEHICLE
MARGINAL TAX RATES
EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES
FISCAL DEFICIT
REVENUE ASSIGNMENTS
PENSIONS
TURNOVER
REFORM PROGRAM
TRADE LIBERALIZATION
TAX REVENUES
SALES TAX
TAX ADMINISTRATION
EXPORTS
HORIZONTAL EQUITY
TAX LAWS
TAX LIABILITY
TAX EXEMPT
EXCISE TAX
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
RESIDENCY
TAX SYSTEM
DIVIDENDS
TAX COLLECTION
DISBURSEMENTS
WITHHOLDING TAX
STATUTORY TAX RATE
TAX PREFERENCES
EXPENDITURES
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
TRUE
TAX SYSTEMS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
FORMAL ECONOMY
TAX-PAYERS
TAX REFORM
EMERGING MARKET
CAPITAL GAINS TAX
BUDGET DEFICITS
TAX PROVISIONS
INTERNAL REVENUE
CORPORATE INCOME TAX
TAX RECEIPTS
INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES
CD
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
GAS SECTOR
INVESTING
TAXPAYERS
ECONOMIC CRISIS
STOCK MARKET
INCOME LEVEL
E-COMMERCE
TAX COLLECTIONS
SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES
WITHHOLDING TAXES
TAXATION
CORPORATE TAX
TAX BASES
TAX INCREASES
RIDER
INCOME TAX
INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL
INCOME TAXES
TRANSFER PRICING
TAX COMPLIANCE
HEAVY RELIANCE
PERSONAL INCOMES
ECONOMIC CRISES
VALUE ADDED TAX
EXPENDITURE
RAPID GROWTH
PUBLIC POLICY
TAX ENFORCEMENT
TAX BURDENS
TOLL
TAX BRACKETS
FISCAL POLICY
TAX REFORMS
INFORMAL ECONOMY
TAX RETURNS
TAX RATE
FISCAL DEFICITS
MONETARY FUND
INFLATION
ROADS
TRANSFER PRICE
TAX INCENTIVES
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
TAX RATES
TAX CUTS
RETURN
EXCISE DUTIES
PUBLIC SPENDING
DOUBLE TAXATION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
TAX STRUCTURE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3099Abstract
The main message of this report is that
 Pakistan can take measures to increase the tax to gross
 domestic product (GDP) ratio by around 3.5 percentage points
 over the next five years. In order to ensure a healthy
 long-run economic development, Pakistan needs to embrace
 substantial changes in tax policy aimed at increasing the
 buoyancy of the tax system, broadening the tax bases,
 reducing distortions and phasing out exemptions. Such tax
 reforms are also required to deal with the risks stemming
 from sustained large budget deficits. Failing to act sooner
 rather than later, only makes the problem more difficult to
 address without considerable instability, raises the
 probability of fiscal and financial disarray at some point
 in the future, and runs the risks of further constraining
 policy flexibility in future. This report highlights design
 ingredients for a comprehensive reform of tax policy in
 Pakistan. In the final analysis, the success of tax reform
 will depend less on the mechanism of taxation and more on
 the politics of taxation. Beyond adequate administrative
 resources and an implementation strategy, this will require
 a clear political recognition of the importance of the task
 and the willingness to persist with tax reform over the long haul.Date
2012-03-19Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Public Sector StudyIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/3099http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3099
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Rising Income Inequality in China : A Race to the TopLuo, Xubei; Zhu, Nong (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-05-31)Income inequality in China has risen
 rapidly in the past decades across regions, between rural
 and urban sectors, and within provinces. The dynamics of
 divergence across these sub-national areas have taken the
 form of a "race to the top" - meaning that all
 segments of the population, including the poor with low
 education in lagging inland rural areas, have experienced
 gains in average income. The largest gains have been
 registered by those with higher income and education in
 leading coastal urban areas. Using the China Economic,
 Population, Nutrition and Health Survey data of 1989 and
 2004, we show that the most important factors explaining
 overall inequality are differential returns to schooling and
 sector of employment. A decomposition analysis based on
 household income determination shows that the increase in
 returns to education explains two-thirds of income changes
 in urban areas and one-sixth in rural areas. The widening
 income gaps are the consequence of higher growth in leading
 urban and coastal areas and that the skilled population has
 benefited more from the economic reforms carried out during
 the last 25 years. The authors argue that rising income
 inequality can be part of a normal process of development at
 a certain stage, and that the dynamics of spatial income
 divergence in the form of "a race to the top" can
 be desirable to some extent as it unleashes competitive
 pressure and creates incentives for investment in skills.
 Continuing to improve market efficiency and investing in
 people, in particular improving education service in lagging
 areas to poor people, are important for sustainable growth
 and equitable distribution in the long run.
-
The Impact of Remittances on Rural Poverty and Inequality in ChinaLuo, Xubei; Zhu, Nong (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-05)Large numbers of agricultural labor
 moved from the countryside to cities after the economic
 reforms in China. Migration and remittances play an
 important role in transforming the structure of rural
 household income. This paper examines the impact of
 rural-to-urban migration on rural poverty and inequality in
 the case of Hubei province using the data of a 2002
 household survey. Since remittances are a potential
 substitute for farm income, the paper presents
 counterfactual scenarios of what rural income, poverty, and
 inequality would have been in the absence of migration. The
 results show that, by providing alternatives to households
 with lower marginal labor productivity in agriculture,
 migration leads to an increase in rural income. In contrast
 to many studies that suggest the increasing share of
 non-farm income in total income widens inequality, this
 paper offers support for the hypothesis that migration tends
 to have egalitarian effects on rural income for three
 reasons: (i) migration is rational self-selection - farmers
 with higher agricultural productivities choose to remain in
 local agricultural production while those with higher
 expected return in urban non-farm sectors migrate; (ii)
 poorer households facing binding constraints of land
 shortage are more likely to migrate; and (iii) the poorest
 poor benefit disproportionately from remittances.
-
Inequality in Latin America : Determinants and ConsequencesLopez, J. Humberto; Perry, Guillermo (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-05-24)Latin America is together with Sub-Saharan Africa the most unequal region of the world. This paper documents recent inequality trends in the Latin American region, going beyond traditional measures of income inequality. The paper also reviews some of the explanations that have been put forward to understand the current situation, and discusses why reducing income inequality should be an important policy priority. In particular, the authors discuss channels through which inequality can affect growth and output volatility. On the whole, the analysis suggests a two-pronged approach to reduce inequality in the region that combines policies aimed at improving the distribution of assets (especially education) with elements aimed at improving the capacity of the state to redistribute income through taxes and transfers.