India - Jharkhand : Public Financial Management and Accountability Study
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
POLICY CHANGESCOMMERCIAL TAXES
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
EXPENDITURE POLICY
TAX REVENUE
DEBT STOCK
BANK ACCOUNTS
FISCAL PLANS
TAX LEGISLATION
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
INTERNAL AUDIT
FISCAL INFORMATION
TREASURIES
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
LAND REFORMS
PRIVATE INVESTMENTS
REVENUE COLLECTION
TAX PAYMENTS
PUBLIC FINANCES
KEY CHALLENGE
FISCAL REFORM
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
FISCAL EXPENDITURE
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY
BUDGET IMPLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX
TRANSACTION
TAX ASSESSMENT
DEPENDENT
DIRECT CREDIT
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
REVENUE ESTIMATES
PUBLIC
CAPACITY BUILDING
REVENUE FORECASTING
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
PENSION
PROCUREMENT
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
ARREARS
ELECTRICITY
ONLINE SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
COMMUNICATION GAP
RESERVE
CONTRACT AWARDS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HOLDING
INEFFICIENT SERVICE DELIVERY
HOUSING
PROVISIONS
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
BUDGETING
POLICY DECISIONS
REVENUE COLLECTIONS
RECEIPTS
BID
DEBT SERVICE
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
DISCLOSURE NORM
EXPENDITURE REPORTS
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN
TRANSPARENCY
UNION
ISSUANCE
DEBT POSITION
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
LEVY
NUTRITION
FISCAL DEFICIT
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
TURNOVER
REORGANIZATION
INTEREST RATES
BUDGETARY IMPACT
MEDIUM-TERM PERSPECTIVE
DISTRICT
RULES OF PROCEDURES
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC INFORMATION
TAX EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC EDUCATION
TAX OFFICIALS
DEBT MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
FISCAL POLICIES
TAX ADMINISTRATION
VILLAGE
MUNICIPALITIES
RECEIPT
PENALTIES
NET WORTH
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
TAX LIABILITY
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR
FINANCIAL POSITION
TAX SYSTEM
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
FINANCIAL ASSETS
BANK GUARANTEE
MANDATE
ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
DISBURSEMENTS
FINANCIAL REPORTING
COURT ORDER
SUB-NATIONAL
PUBLIC WORKS
SAVINGS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEBTS
EXPENDITURES
POLICY FORMULATION
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS
LOC
WITHDRAWAL
FACE VALUE
INTEREST COST
LEVEL OF DEBT
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
EFFICIENCY OF SERVICE DELIVERY
BUDGET PROCESS
GOVERNOR
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
URBAN POVERTY
INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS
FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
AUDIT COMMITTEES
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
EXCHANGE RATE
COST ESTIMATES
STATE BUDGET
REGISTRATION PROCESS
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
TAXPAYERS
PENALTY
EXPENDITURE COMPOSITION
SETTLEMENT
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
REPAYMENT
BUDGET FORMULATION
TAXATION
SALARY
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
EXCESS EXPENDITURE
DISBURSEMENT
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
EXPENDITURE
STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURE
DEFICITS
TAX ENFORCEMENT
TREASURY
LIABILITY
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
VILLAGES
BUDGET EXECUTION
INTEREST COSTS
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
CENTRAL TAXES
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL ADVISOR
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
SURETY
OUTSTANDING ADVANCES
DEBT SERVICING
ACCOUNTANT
CASH BALANCES
BUDGET CYCLE
MEDIUM-TERM FISCAL
FISCAL DEFICITS
STATE GOVERNMENTS
INFLATION
ROADS
FISCAL BALANCES
PUBLIC RESOURCES
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
DEFICIT FINANCING
INTEREST RATE
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
SEIZURES
CREDIBILITY
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
STATE GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC SPENDING
RESERVE BANK
STATE ELECTRICITY
POLICY ANALYSIS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12700Abstract
Jharkhand, India's youngest and
 28th state came into existence in November 2000 pursuant to
 the reorganization of the erstwhile State of Bihar by the
 Bihar State Reorganization Act, 2000. More than 77 percent
 of the population of the state resides in rural areas and
 depends on agriculture for sustenance. Jharkhand is one of
 the richest states in the country in terms of mineral
 resources. Close to half of the gross domestic product
 (GSDP) of the state emanates from industry which includes
 mining, quarrying and registered manufacturing. But the
 high degree of industrialization has not resulted in a high
 level of income for the state. While the structure of the
 output indicates a high level of industrialization, the
 structure of employment reveals the predominance of
 agriculture. The purpose of this study is to make an
 objective assessment of the Public Financial Management and
 Accountability (PFMA) system of the state, identify its
 strengths and weaknesses and areas that may be in need of
 reforms and related capacity building. This study is a
 prerequisite to determining the precise nature and extent of
 any capacity building initiatives in Jharkhand. The study
 provides the Government a diagnostic tool for establishing
 priorities and to develop a baseline for monitoring future
 PFM performance of the state.Date
2007-09Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/12700http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12700
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.
-
Colombia - National Level Public Financial Management and Procurement Report : Public Financial Management PerformanceInter-American Development Bank; World Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This Public Financial Management
 Performance Report (PFMPR) analyzes the performance of
 Colombia's public financial management (PFM)
 institutions, systems and processes. It documents areas
 where performance is close to or follows international good
 practice, as well as opportunities to further enhance PFM
 contribution to the goals of strengthening fiscal
 discipline, enabling more efficient allocation of resources,
 increasing operational efficiency, and fostering
 transparency. It is expected that the identified
 opportunities will strengthen further the Government of
 Colombia's programs of continuous PFM improvement, as
 provided for under the National Development Plan pillar
 regarding a state at the service of its citizens: efficient
 and effective Government. The main challenges cited in the
 report could also be an important reference to future
 development plans and PFM reforms. Ensuring the
 sustainability and trajectory of PFM programs becomes even
 more critical in the context of public expenditure policies
 to deal with the current international economic crisis. The
 study is based on the 28 high-level indicators and 69
 individual dimensions that compose the PFM performance
 measurement framework. Each indicator seeks to measure
 performance of a key PFM element against a scale from A to
 D. The highest score is warranted for an individual
 indicator if the core PFM element meets the relevant
 objective in a complete, orderly, accurate, timely and
 coordinated way, based on existing good international practices.
-
Pakistan, Sindh Province - Public
 financial management accountability assessmentWorld Bank (World Bank, 2009-09-18)This report presents the public
 financial management and accountability assessment (PFMAA)
 for Pakistan's Sindh province. The assessment uses the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA) 2005
 framework, which comprises 31 performance indicators to
 evaluate: (i) the six core public financial management (PFM)
 dimensions (credibility of the budget; transparency and
 comprehensiveness; policy-based budgeting; predictability
 and control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny), and (ii) the extent to
 which donor practices and the management of donor funds
 affect the PFM systems in the country. This assessment
 report highlights the likely impact of PFM weaknesses on
 budgetary outcomes, aggregate fiscal discipline, the
 strategic allocation of resources, and efficient service delivery.