Author(s)
World BankKeywords
PUBLIC EXPENDITUREINTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
PURCHASING POWER PARITY
DATA ANALYSIS
TEAM MEMBERS
PRODUCTIVITY
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
TAX REVENUE
REVENUE PERFORMANCE
GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
FISCAL FEDERALISM
DEBT
FISCAL ADJUSTMENTS
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
REVENUE COLLECTION
SOCIAL PROTECTION
HEALTH SERVICE
TRANSPORT
HEALTH SERVICES
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENTS
PENSION SYSTEM
EXCISE TAXES
TAX POLICY
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT
STATE TAXES
LOCAL SPENDING
EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
RATIONALIZATION
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
ADJUSTMENT LENDING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
LOCAL REVENUE
HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURES
FISCAL YEAR
STATE FUNDS
POVERTY REDUCTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
DEBT SERVICE
EDUCATIONAL FINANCING
EQUALIZATION
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
EXPENDITURE SURVEY
HEALTH OUTCOMES
TECHNICAL CAPACITY
CONCESSIONAL TERMS
HEALTH CARE
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
PENSION SYSTEMS
PRESENT VALUE
TASK TEAM LEADER
DEBT RELIEF
BORROWING
PENSIONS
HUMAN RESOURCES
ECONOMIC SITUATION
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC EDUCATION
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
DEBT SUSTAINABILTY
SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS
TAX ADMINISTRATION
LOCAL LEVEL
INSURANCE
REHABILITATION
POVERTY LINE
CASH ASSISTANCE
PUBLIC HEALTH
MDF
PUBLIC SECTOR
IMPORTS
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS
TAX SYSTEM
TAX COLLECTION
FISCAL EFFICIENCY
CASH-FLOW
SAVINGS
SHORT TERM
SOCIAL INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
EXTERNAL DEBT
CURRENCY UNIT
TAX SYSTEMS
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
POVERTY IMPACT
NATIONS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
INTERNALLY DISPLACED PEOPLE
BUDGET SYSTEM
APPROPRIATIONS
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
SOCIAL SECTOR
SOCIAL SECTORS
CORPORATE INCOME TAX
TAX ARREARS
BASIC EDUCATION
SOCIAL SECURITY
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
EXCHANGE RATE
PUBLIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
PER CAPITA GNP
PURCHASING POWER
ECONOMIC GROWTH
REVENUE VOLATILITY
OIL
NATIONAL EXPENDITURES
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
INCOME LEVEL
POLICY FRAMEWORK
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX COLLECTIONS
BUDGET FORMULATION
SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES
TAXATION
EQUITY IN EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY
PRICE STABILITY
WAGES
INCOME TAXES
CENTRAL AGENCIES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
HEALTH EXPENDITURES
REVENUE MOBILIZATION
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
TREASURY
INCOME
BUDGET EXECUTION
BUDGET FINANCING
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
REAL TERMS
TAX REFORMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC RESOURCES
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
SOCIAL SERVICES
REVENUE MANAGEMENT
BUDGET CYCLES
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
TAX RATES
PER-CAPITA INCOME
PUBLIC SPENDING
TAX STRUCTURE
INCOME COUNTRIES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14539Abstract
Like other low-income countries,
 Georgia's ability to reduce poverty and meet the
 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015 will depend
 crucially on its ability to sustain per-capita GDP growth
 and to use effectively and efficiently its scarce public
 resources. Indeed, increased public expenditures will not
 result in improved social outcomes unless current
 productivity levels are improved. This report shows that
 weaknesses in Georgia's public expenditure management
 systems have led to serious inefficiencies and inequities in
 the use of public resources and have prevented the necessary
 restructuring in public expenditures. The first three
 chapters explore sources of these systemic problems in the
 context of macroeconomic management, revenue policy and
 administration, and budget management systems. Subsequent
 chapters explore the scope for strengthening budget
 management systems in the areas most critical for poverty
 reduction and the attainment of MDGs: local governments and
 social sector spending. These chapters both corroborate and
 supplement with further detail the core constraints on
 public expenditure restructuring seen in the earlier
 chapters, but also map out the complementary components of a
 reform strategy which recognizes the need for parallel
 action by central agencies, line ministries, and local
 governments. Given that identified weaknesses cannot all be
 addressed at once, the PER offers an approach to sequence
 expenditure management reforms in phases.Date
2013-07-24Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14539http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14539
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sudan - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) : Case Study of the Health SectorWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2011-12)The Sudan referendum on post-Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) arrangements was held during January 9-15, 2011 with results in favor of secession of the South by July 9, 2011. The economic effects will transmit largely through the fiscal and external accounts and the outcome of secession negotiations will determine the post-CPA economic landscape. The secession outcome will likely put significant strain on economic stability in the North. The PETS study is organized as follows: chapter two presents the objectives of the study, and the survey methodology and sampling size. Chapter three focuses on the specific developments of budget data (functional classification) in the Northern States. The chapter sheds some light on revenues and expenditure in Northern States and also zooms into the specific responsibilities transferred to the states. Towards the end, the chapter addresses the budgets specifically of the six states that have been sampled for the study (in a purposive sample). Chapter four is the heart of the study and is based on the flow of funds analysis underlying the PET survey. It starts out with addressing the question on 'who' finances the health sector. With this it gives a good account of the decentralized nature of health services, which is a prerequisite to actually track public spending through the system. Chapter five explores the interconnections between public expenditure and service delivery in Sudan and tries to assess the effectiveness of public spending in contributing to the quality of health services. Chapter six concludes with a highlight of the findings and possible policy options. Annex one provides six short extracts of the main findings and conclusions for each state as additional case studies.
-
Serbia Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-06-29)A Public Expenditure and Financial
 accountability (PEFA) repeat assessment was conducted in the
 Republic of Serbia (RoS) between November 2014 and May 2015
 by an independent team of experts, led by the World Bank
 (WB). The assessment was financed jointly by the
 Strengthening of Accountability and the Fiduciary
 Environment (SAFE) Trust Fund of the Swiss State Secretariat
 for Economic Affairs (SECO), the European Union Delegation
 to Serbia (EU Delegation) and WB. The period covered by this
 Assessment (2011-2013) was dominated by the challenges posed
 by the aftermath of the global economic recession which
 affected macro-fiscal performances. Notwithstanding these
 challenges PFM improvements can be observed in strengthening
 legislative framework, and Budget classification, multi-year
 fiscal planning, procurement and external audit. In other
 areas such as the composition of expenditure out-turn
 compared with originally approved budget, expenditures
 arrears, oversight of fiscal risk, and effectiveness of tax
 collection, predictability in the availability of funds,
 application of public sector accounting standards
 application and legislative scrutiny of annual budget law
 and final accounts, further work is needed to improve PFM performance.
-
Iraq Public Expenditure and Institutional Assessment, Volume 2World Bank (Washington, DC, 2017-09-07)The public expenditure and institutional
 assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors.
 First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its
 international development partners have recognized the
 critical importance of sound management of Iraq's
 substantial public financial resources. Both parties support
 the reform and modernization of public financial management
 (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq
 (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the
 importance of establishing a baseline against which progress
 in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for
 an assessment which provides the information necessary to
 measure the performance of a country's PFM system.
 Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the
 past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for
 PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can
 help to shape and prioritize the necessary development
 program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume
 one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA)
 assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM
 issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital
 investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq
 financial management information system (IFMIS), public
 accounting and accountability, and payroll management.
 Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the
 PEFA assessment.