Author(s)
World BankKeywords
PUBLIC REVENUESPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
LABOR MARKETS
ACCOUNTABILITY
FISCAL COSTS
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
PRODUCTIVITY
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CPI
CITIZENS
MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION
URBAN PLANNING
INTERNAL AUDIT
REVENUE SOURCES
INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS
SOCIAL PROTECTION
POLITICAL INSTABILITY
BUDGET REFORMS
FISCAL REFORM
BUDGETARY FUNDS
POLICY CHOICES
WORKING
TAX OBLIGATIONS
PENSION SYSTEM
TAX
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
POLITICAL FACTORS
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
FINANCIAL SECTOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
SECTOR PROVIDERS
PUBLIC AGENCIES
CAPACITY BUILDING
EXECUTION
PUBLIC BUDGET
POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RATIONALIZATION
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
SERVICE QUALITY
POLICY DECISIONS
FISCAL REFORMS
DECISION-MAKING
FISCAL YEAR
CIVIL SOCIETY
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR
EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
PRIORITY AREAS
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
FISCAL
INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
LEGISLATION
TRANSPARENCY
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
HEALTH INSURANCE
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
FISCAL DEFICIT
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
GOVERNMENT POLICY
PENSIONS
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
HUMAN RESOURCES
INVESTMENT SPENDING
TRADEOFFS
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
REVENUE MEASURES
SOCIAL PROTECTION PROGRAMS
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LOCAL LEVEL
INSURANCE
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
REHABILITATION
PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL PROBLEMS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
LAWS
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
UNEMPLOYMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
EXTERNAL DEBT
SECURITIES
CURRENCY UNIT
FOREIGN CURRENCY DEPOSITS
PRIVATIZATION AGENCY
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
SECURITY MEASURES
HUMAN RESOURCE
RETIREMENT
PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC SERVICE
INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS
DONOR COMMUNITY
EXCHANGE RATE
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
POLICY REVIEW
CIVIL SERVICE
EMPLOYMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
FISCAL PRESSURES
INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
POVERTY TARGETING
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
STRUCTURAL CHANGE
LABOR MARKET
POLICY FRAMEWORK
REGULATORY REGIME
PUBLIC DEBT
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
BUDGET FORMULATION
WAGES
CAPITALIZATION
POLICY PROCESS
CENTRAL AGENCIES
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
SERVICE DELIVERY
FINANCIAL MARKETS
DEFICITS
PUBLIC POLICY
TAX ENFORCEMENT
TREASURY
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS ACCESS TO INFORMATION
COUNTRY'S COMPETITIVENESS
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
POLICY REFORM
DECISION MAKERS
BUDGET EXECUTION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
FINANCING SOURCES
FISCAL POLICY
INFORMAL ECONOMY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BUDGET REFORM
IMPROVED ACCESS
POLICY MAKING
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
INFLATION
POLICY OPTIONS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
TEAM
PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT
FINANCIAL CONTROL
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
DEPOSIT INSURANCE
SOCIAL SERVICES
POLICY COORDINATION
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
POVERTY LEVELS
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
FOREIGN DEBT
PUBLIC SPENDING
POLICY ANALYSIS
DECENTRALIZATION
ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15427Abstract
The review was undertaken, and completed
 against a background of substantial political economic
 disruption: the Kosovo crisis of 1999 threatened to
 undermine the country's accomplishments in building
 macroeconomic, and fiscal stability; and, the security
 crisis of 2001, tested once again Macedonia's
 political, and economic integrity. Both instances were
 successfully surpassed, showing significant steps towards
 becoming a market oriented state within the European
 context, and, in its willingness to accept, and ratify the
 Peace Agreement of November 2001. But, expenditure pressures
 rose, leading to additional spending, while revenues
 declined owing to economic weakness, and decreased tax
 enforcement; clearly, fiscal stability stands on the
 balance. Not surprising, the quality of expenditures became
 an important issue, for although acceptable aggregate
 targets were being achieved, the budget's economic
 composition was not suited for promoting economic growth.
 Institutional aspects show that budget preparation, and
 processes provide no link between policy commitments, and
 available resources, aggravated by unfounded credibility on
 the budget, as an instrument for policy formation.
 Recommendations call for improved resource allocation within
 fiscal constraints, i.e., reducing public resources, and,
 laying the foundation for a budget process legal framework.
 In addition, reforms should be institutionalized through
 accountability, and capacity building.Date
2002-04-02Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15427http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15427
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Iraq Public Expenditure and Institutional Assessment, Volume 1World Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)The public expenditure and institutional
 assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors.
 First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its
 international development partners have recognized the
 critical importance of sound management of Iraq's
 substantial public financial resources. Both parties support
 the reform and modernization of public financial management
 (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq
 (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the
 importance of establishing a baseline against which progress
 in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for
 an assessment which provides the information necessary to
 measure the performance of a country's PFM system.
 Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the
 past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for
 PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can
 help to shape and prioritize the necessary development
 program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume
 one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA)
 assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM
 issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital
 investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq
 financial management information system (IFMIS), public
 accounting and accountability, and payroll management.
 Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the
 PEFA assessment.
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).