Assessment of the Financing Framework for Municipal Infrastructure in Vietnam
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
NPLCREDIT RISKS
LOCAL MARKET
PAYMENT OF DEBT
PUBLIC DEBT MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL BANK
FOREIGN LOAN
MUTUAL FUNDS
EQUITY CAPITAL
MUNICIPAL BONDS
URBAN PLANNING
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
PUBLIC FINANCES
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
PROPERTY RIGHTS
VALUATION
LOCAL CURRENCY
DEBT OBLIGATIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
MARKET ECONOMY
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX
EQUITY MARKETS
LEVIES
EQUITY STAKES
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
MARKET PRICE
NON-PERFORMING LOANS
BOND MARKET
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
PUBLIC
CAPITAL MARKETS
LONG-TERM CAPITAL
PENSION
FOREIGN FUNDS
DEBT DEFAULT
ELECTRICITY
RESERVE
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS
BOND
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARKET FAILURES
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
FOREIGN INVESTORS
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
BUDGETING
STATE BANK
CREDITORS
INVESTMENT FUNDS
DEBT REPAYMENT
MATURITY PERIODS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LENDER
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
BID
CREDIT RATINGS
DEBT SERVICE
BIDS
PRIVATE SECTOR
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
MUNICIPAL BOND ISSUANCE
ASSET MANAGEMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION
URBAN SERVICES
TRANSPARENCY
EXCHANGE RATE MOVEMENTS
LAND USE
LEVY
PUBLIC ASSETS
DEMAND FOR BONDS
OUTSTANDING AMOUNT
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
INTEREST RATES
GOVERNMENT BONDS
LOAN AGREEMENT
INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
LENDING DECISIONS
LENDERS
BOND ISSUE
RETURNS
DEBT MANAGEMENT
INSURANCE
SHORT-TERM DEPOSITS
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
DOMESTIC BORROWING
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
MDF
PUBLIC SECTOR
INVESTMENT CAPITAL
LAND VALUES
LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE
DEBT REPAYMENTS
AUCTION
PUBLIC DEBTS
PAYMENT OF INTEREST
COMMERCIAL LOANS
TRUST FUNDS
DEBTS
TIMELY PAYMENT
EXPENDITURES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
DEBT RESTRUCTURING
SECURITIES
PRIVATE CAPITAL
COMMERCIAL BANK
CAPITAL GRANTS
INVESTMENT RATE
BALANCE SHEET
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
MATURITY MISMATCHES
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
SUB-NATIONAL BORROWERS
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
RISK FACTOR
COLLATERAL
BANKING SECTOR
OUTSTANDING DEBT
CURRENCY
MUNICIPAL BOND
MUNICIPAL FINANCE
INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS
MARKET SIZE
MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS
LONG-TERM INSTRUMENT
PENSION FUNDS
BORROWING CAPACITY
EXCHANGE RATE
URBANIZATION
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
RISK ASSESSMENTS
REVENUE SHARING
ECONOMIC GROWTH
INSURANCE COMPANIES
INVESTING
MATURITY STRUCTURE
SETTLEMENT
LICENSES
MATURITIES
CORPORATE BONDS
EXTERNAL FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
INCOME LEVEL
RISK MANAGEMENT
MARKET MAKERS
PUBLIC DEBT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
REPAYMENT
CAPITAL BASE
DEVELOPMENT BANK
AUCTIONS
SETTLEMENT SYSTEM
IMPLICIT GUARANTEES
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
GOVERNMENT DEBT
CAPITAL FORMATION
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
LENDING INTEREST RATE
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
DISBURSEMENT
SHORT MATURITY
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
EXPENDITURE
CURRENCY RISK
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
BOND ISSUANCE
TREASURY
COMMERCIAL BANKS
LAND VALUE
SUB-NATIONAL DEBT
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
DEBT FINANCING
GOVERNMENT BOND
NON-PERFORMING LOAN
OUTSTANDING DEBTS
PUBLIC SECTOR DEBT
REPAYMENT CAPACITY
CREDIT RATING
PORTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
SUB-NATIONAL FINANCES
ROADS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
COMMERCIAL BANK LOANS
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
DEBT MARKETS
INVESTMENT FUND
PUBLIC FINANCE
BOND ISSUES
INVESTMENT PROJECTS
TRUST FUND
INTEREST RATE
COMMERCIAL BANKING
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
MATURITY PERIOD
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
TAX RATES
RETURN
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
INVESTOR INTEREST
FOREIGN CURRENCY
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17568Abstract
A fundamental challenge for Vietnam is
 to improve the affordability and efficiency of
 infrastructure investment. The fragmentation of public
 infrastructure investment results in duplication and waste,
 and is a major underlying cause of investment inefficiency.
 Bond issuance has been the most prominent form of debt
 financing at the sub-national level. At the provincial
 level, significant disconnects exist between total planned
 investment needs in infrastructure, and the effective demand
 for such investment. The success of any initiative to
 improve the financing of municipal infrastructure in Vietnam
 hinges on advances in the broader landscape of policy reform
 as part of the country's long-term development. Meeting
 these challenges requires a comprehensive approach that
 addresses issues of governance, financing, and execution.
 This report has been formulated with the objective of
 informing the Government of Vietnam (GOV) on how the
 financing framework for municipal infrastructure in the
 country can be strengthened. It is based on an assessment of
 the constraints and opportunities that sub-national
 governments face in accessing financing for infrastructure
 development. It also draws upon lessons and good practices
 from international experience in this area, considering
 their relevance for Vietnam. A set of recommendations and
 implementable actions is provided, recognizing the broader
 context of ongoing reforms that are needed on institutions,
 incentives and the availability of information.Date
2014-04-01Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Country Infrastructure FrameworkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/17568http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17568
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Lessons for the Urban Century : Decentralized Infrastructure Finance in the World BankPeterson, George E.; Huet, Gwénaelle; Clarke Annez, Patricia (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2008)This book takes a look at the past to
 gain insights for the future. Nearly 30 years ago, when the
 world urban population was only about half of the 3 billion
 that it is today, when most Less Developed Countries (LDCs)
 were primarily rural, and before the wave of
 decentralization of the 1980s and 1990s, the World Bank
 developed an instrument with great potential. The key
 characteristics of this instrument, the Urban Infrastructure
 Fund (UIF), are several. It provides finance for an array of
 urban services, not just one sector, such as water and
 sanitation, leaving flexibility for local beneficiaries to
 set their priorities. UIF projects operate in more than one
 city. Perhaps the most important distinctive feature is that
 these projects use local institutions to do the work of
 identifying, appraising and channeling finance to
 subnational entities (municipalities, local utilities, or
 community groups) on behalf of the World Bank. This
 arrangement makes it feasible to reach beyond the major
 capitals or business centers such as Chongqing, Mumbai, or
 Sao Paulo, or even regional capitals, to fund much smaller
 subprojects, suited to the needs and capacities of smaller
 cities and towns, because local agents are tasked with
 identifying and appraising these projects. Delegating these
 functions makes it practicable not only for a large
 International Financial Institution (IFI) such as the World
 Bank but also for national governments to reach small
 municipalities. Providing support to large numbers of
 municipalities with relatively small investment needs is a
 complex task, but it is fundamental to scaling up beyond
 small pilot projects to programs improving urban services countrywide.
-
Financing Cities : Fiscal Responsibility and Urban Infrastructure in Brazil, China, India, Poland and South AfricaClarke Annez, Patricia; Peterson, George E. (New Dehli : Sage Publications and World Bank, 2012-05-31)This book, Financing cities, emphasized case studies on different topics to look at the interactions of a range of variables and factors and to see how they fit together. Rather than require each case to follow the same format, the authors have structured their papers around the issues that matter most from their perspective in addressing the topic in hand. The first part of this book presents case studies describing the framework established at the national level to promote urban infrastructure finance while ensuring fiscal discipline and reviewing recent experience as well as future challenges. The subjects covered include the impact of political and fiscal decentralization, limitations on borrowing, managing moral hazard, the role of the financial sector, the achieving of the right balance between stringent controls and encouragement of local governments taking responsibility for fiscal discipline coupled with market discipline. The cases featured include three of the world's largest decentralized nations; together the five countries featured in the conference account for nearly a third of the world's urban population. Part I includes case studies for each of the five countries featured in the conference: Brazil (Chapter 1), China (Chapter 2), India (Chapter 3), Poland (Chapter 4) and South Africa (Chapter 5). Part II then shifts from the frameworks for fiscal discipline to urban infrastructure investments and the strategies used to mobilize investment funding. Chapters 6 and 7 examine the financing strategies for urban infrastructure in Shanghai and Brazil respectively. The next two chapters focus on specialized intermediaries offering urban infrastructure finance in cities. One is a fully private venture in South Africa (Chapter 9) while the other, in Tamil Nadu, India (Chapter 8), is a spin-off of a government fund with minority private ownership. The final two chapters examine experiences with two other mechanisms for mobilizing funding for infrastructure investments from the private sector, land leasing and sales (Chapter 10) and private participation in infrastructure operations (Chapter 11).
-
The Urban Development Investment Corporations (UDICs) in Chongqing, ChinaWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)Urban Development Investment
 Corporations (UDICs) have over the years become the central
 pillar in the local government drive to build infrastructure
 in China, where local governments are not allowed to engage
 in direct market borrowing. UDICs were established during
 the early 1990s when local governments were under great
 pressure to both build municipal infrastructure and to
 reform the role of the government in infrastructure
 development. The UDIC model provided the local governments
 with a corporate government structure to borrow from the
 market and quickly develop infrastructure. They are treated
 as municipal corporations under the Company Law of the
 Peoples' Republic of China (PRC). The law does not
 clarify the relationship between UDICs and the local
 government, including the limits of the financial liability
 of the local governments vis-a-vis UDICs. The Government of
 China (GOC) agencies expect that the World Bank (WB)
 Technical Assistance Report (TAR), based on the detailed
 analysis of the financial operations of a selected UDIC in
 Chongqing, will offer critical technical assistance to the
 Chongqing Municipal Government (CMG), which can also be
 shared with other Chinese cities. The GOC agencies realize
 that this TAR is the first step in the right direction, in
 that it will specifically address the needs of a
 reform-minded municipal government and clarify one UDIC
 model in detail. It is anticipated that similar efforts can
 be undertaken in the coming years with other reform-minded
 and high-priority cities that are employing different models
 of UDIC to finance municipal infrastructure.