Author(s)
World BankKeywords
PROXYCORPORATION
RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
COMPANY
LARGE SHAREHOLDERS
SHAREHOLDER
ACQUISITIONS
CIVIL LAW SYSTEM
ACCOUNTABILITY
COMMON SHARES
LIMITED LIABILITY
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
SINGLE SHAREHOLDER
PROFIT SHARING
NATIONAL BANK
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
BOARD RESOLUTIONS
FOREIGN CAPITAL
CHARTER
LEGAL PROVISION
AUTHORIZATION
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR
PRIVATE COMPANIES
SECURITIES LAW
MANAGERS
CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
FINANCIAL REPORTS
CORPORATE STRATEGY
COMPANY LAW
FIRMS
INSIDER INFORMATION
STAKEHOLDERS
ACQUISITION
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
INVESTMENT SERVICES
AUDIT COMMITTEES
STATE-OWNED COMPANIES
CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
RIGHTS OF OWNERS
BENEFICIAL OWNERS
CORPORATIONS
LARGE COMPANIES
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
SHAREHOLDERS
CORPORATE PERFORMANCE
CAPITAL MARKETS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE
SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
RISK MANAGEMENT
TAKEOVERS
MERGERS
COMPANIES ACT
DUE CARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
TAKEOVER
LEGISLATIVE REFORM
CORPORATE CONTROL
SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENTS
GOLDEN SHARES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PRIVATE PLACEMENT
CONSENSUS
AUTHORITY
FOREIGN INVESTORS
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
DECISION-MAKING BODY
STAKEHOLDER
PORTFOLIO
DECISION-MAKING
INSIDER DEALING
TAX AUTHORITY
BOARD MEMBER
SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM
DIVIDEND PAYMENTS
REPRESENTATIVES
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
STOCK OPTIONS
VETO
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
BANKS
STOCK EXCHANGE
CORPORATE ASSETS
PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
TRANSPARENCY
LEGISLATION
LEGAL PROVISIONS
COMPANY LIMITED
UNION
BOOK VALUE
DUTY OF LOYALTY
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
TRADE UNIONS
COURT
SHAREHOLDER VOTE
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
SUBSCRIPTION
CIVIL LIABILITY
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
INDEPENDENT AUDIT
INVESTOR PROTECTION
LIMITED
GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
LISTED COMPANIES
BENEFICIAL OWNER
SHARE OWNERSHIP
DUE DILIGENCE
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INSOLVENCY
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL CONTROL
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
BOARD MEMBERS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
FINANCIAL SERVICES
INVESTMENT FUND
PUBLIC COMPANY
FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
SHARE OPTIONS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
VOTING
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLE
SHARE RIGHTS
DISCLOSURE RULES
CHARTERS
TENDER OFFERS
INSIDER TRADING
DIVIDENDS
PUBLIC COMPANIES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15709Abstract
This report assesses the corporate
 governance policy framework and enforcement and compliance
 practices in Hungary. Hungary has already invested
 considerable resources in upgrading its legislation to meet
 European Union Directives, and the legislative and
 regulatory framework dealing with corporate governance
 issues is robust. The major issues identified by this review
 include: (1) the general weakness of the supervisory board,
 which causes some non-compliance with several OECD
 Principles; and (2) a conflict between law and practice in
 the area of share registration, particularly the problems
 related to the ability of all shareholders to attend
 meetings and exercise their voting and other rights.
 Strengths and weaknesses are highlighted, and the policy
 recommendations made may be grouped under three categories:
 legislative reform, institutional strengthening, and
 voluntary/private initiatives. The report recommends
 creating a "share registration working group" to
 synchronize law and practice in the area of shareholder
 record keeping and voting. It also makes recommendations to
 be implemented as part of a Company Law update. Finally, the
 report promotes private sector initiatives and capacity
 building to build on legislative progress on corporate
 governance reform. It recommends developing a Hungarian
 corporate governance code of best practice, which would
 address key issues to include supervisory board roles and
 institutional investor responsibilities. The report also
 proposes that an Institute of Directors be created train
 supervisory board members, disseminate best practice, and
 promote dialogue between the public and private sectors.
 Together, these measures give issuers the choice to
 implement best practice and investors a benchmark against
 which to measure corporate governance in Hungary.Date
2003-02Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15709http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15709
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : MalawiWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-10-16)This ROSC assessment of corporate
 governance in Malawi benchmarks law and practice against the
 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
 Principles of Corporate Governance and covers public
 interest entities (including public limited companies,
 financial institutions, and parastatal companies) with
 special focus on the companies listed on the MSE. This
 report should be read in conjunction with the Accounting and
 Auditing ROSC Malawi, which reviews issues related to
 accounting, auditing, and financial reporting in more
 detail. Growth in 2006 has been estimated at 6.5 percent.
 Inflation and bank lending rates have declined significantly
 over the past few years. Malawi qualified for debt relief
 under the World Bank s Heavily Indebted Poor Countries
 (HIPC) initiative in 2006. The business environment has
 improved, and the private sector is optimistic about the
 future; the Malawi Business Survey 2006 conducted by the
 Malawi Confederation of the Chambers of Commerce and
 Industry (MCCI) rated the business environment good to very
 good with better expectations in the next 12 months. The
 Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS) 2006-2011 sets
 a future growth target of more than 6 percent annually for
 the five-year period, which will increase per capita income
 to US$450 by the end of 2011. For this purpose, Malawi is
 seeking to increase domestic and foreign investment.
-
Corporate Governance Country Assessment : ZambiaWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-15)Good corporate governance ensures that companies use their resources more efficiently, protects minority shareholders, leads to better decision making, and improves relations with workers, creditors, and other stakeholders. It is an important prerequisite for attracting the patient capital needed for sustained long-term economic growth. This report provides an assessment of Zambia's corporate governance policy framework. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulation, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Zambia. Tapping the potential of capital markets and professionalizing boards and management will require reform efforts to continue. The companies act should be revised and harmonized with the securities act. Revisions should be accompanied by an analysis of lessons learned from the recently revised companies act in the UK. Stakeholders should consider moving explicit protection against unfair related party transactions into the Code, and revising the non-financial disclosure framework for listed companies. The Lusaka Stock Exchange (LuSE) and its stakeholders should then consider revisions to the code and further develop the LuSE website as a primary source of information about listed companies. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should continue to build its enforcement capacity, and to establish corporate governance enforcement priorities. More support and resources should be provided by the public and private sector to the Institute of Directors of Zambia.
-
A Guide to Corporate Governance Practices in the European UnionInternational Finance Corporation (World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2015-06-25)As one of the most rapidly changing
 corporate governance environments in the world, Europe
 represents a microcosm of the exciting innovation happening
 in the corporate governance arena, ranging from new
 approaches to board-level corporate governance practices to
 changes in regulatory requirements at the legislative level.
 Representing a diverse mix of nations at various stages of
 economic development and market maturity, the European Union
 as an entity is demonstrating the broad value of a
 prioritized focus on corporate governance while accounting
 for individual country and company circumstances. This
 publication, a guide to Corporate Governance practices in
 the European Union, offers an overview of the changes taking
 place across the EU’s corporate governance landscape. It
 provides a focused examination of specific regulations and
 practices as well as a frank assessment of the challenges
 that remain. The value of this publication is that it
 examines the issues from all sides. It assesses the steps
 forward and steps backward, the progress made and the gaps
 that remain, presenting the sometimes widely varying
 perspectives of owners, boards, management, and other
 stakeholders to create a complete picture of the European
 corporate governance environment.