Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
LIQUIDITYEXPENDITURE COMMITMENTS
PUBLIC REVENUES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE POLICIES
INTEREST PAYMENTS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
BUDGET CREDIBILITY
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
FISCAL AFFAIRS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SECTOR CAPACITY BUILDING
EXPENDITURE POLICY
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT
DUAL BUDGETING
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
INTERNAL CONTROLS
REFORM STRATEGY
MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION
INTERNAL AUDIT
FISCAL INFORMATION
REFORM AGENDA
DEBT
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
TAX PAYMENTS
PUBLIC FINANCES
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT
DUAL BUDGET SYSTEM
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
CAPITAL SPENDING
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
BUDGETARY FUNDS
OIL PRICES
NATIONAL SAVINGS
EFFECTIVENESS OF SERVICE DELIVERY
AUDITOR GENERAL
EXTERNAL FINANCING
BUDGET OPERATIONS
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
REFORM PROJECTS
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTION
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS
DEGREE OF VARIATION
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS CRISIS
REFORM PROCESS
PROGRAMS
BUDGET LAW
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
FEDERAL BUDGET PROCESS
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS
BUDGET ESTIMATES
ANNUAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION
DECISION-MAKING
REAL INTEREST RATES
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMMODITY PRICES
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
BUDGET DATA
BUDGET PROPOSAL
DEBT SERVICE
PRIVATE SECTOR
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
TRANSPARENCY
GOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
PUBLIC ACCOUNT
QUANTITATIVE DATA
FISCAL DEFICIT
INTEREST RATES
CENTRAL CONTROL
REFORM PROGRAM
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
ACCOUNTING
ECONOMIC STABILITY
PUBLIC INFORMATION
DOMESTIC DEMAND
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
FINANCIAL CRISIS
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
FISCAL POLICIES
TAX ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SERVICES
REVENUE INCREASES
PUBLIC SECTOR
CASH MANAGEMENT
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
MONETARY POLICY
TAX COLLECTION
STRUCTURAL REFORM
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
FEDERAL BUDGET
FORWARD ESTIMATES
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS
EXPENDITURES
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
CASH BASIS
NATIONAL BANK
MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
BUDGET YEAR
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS
BUDGET SYSTEM
APPROPRIATIONS
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
BUDGET PREPARATION
ECONOMIC SHOCKS
BURDEN OF ADJUSTMENT
FINANCIAL REPORTS
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
SELF-ASSESSMENT
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
EXCHANGE RATE
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
FISCAL RISK
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
FISCAL PRESSURES
INFLATIONARY PRESSURES
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MONETARY POLICIES
DEBT POLICY
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
GOVERNMENT DEBT
CENTRAL AGENCIES
SERVICE DELIVERY
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
FISCAL POSITION
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
FISCAL FRAMEWORKS
EXPENDITURE CONTROL
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
BUDGET EXECUTION
EXTERNAL SHOCKS
EXPENDITURE DATA
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL OPERATIONS
BUDGET BALANCE
BUDGET PLANNING
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
FISCAL RISKS
COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT
ARTICLE
AGGREGATE FISCAL
CASH BALANCES
BUDGETARY OUTCOMES
BUDGET SUPPORT
BUDGET CYCLE
CASH LIMITS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
INFLATION
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL CONTROL
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
BUDGET INFORMATION
STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION
SOCIAL SERVICES
EXPENDITURE CUTS
PUBLIC FINANCE
DONOR FUNDS
INTEREST RATE
SUSTAINABILITY OF REFORMS
COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTING
EXCHANGE RESERVES
AGGREGATE REVENUE
FISCAL REPORTING
REFORM PROJECT
BUDGET CONTROL
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MEDIUM-TERM MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE
BUDGET STATEMENT
BUDGET DEFICIT
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
FISCAL ADMINISTRATION
FOREIGN DEBT
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
PUBLIC SPENDING
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2862Abstract
This Public Expenditure and Financial
 Accountability (PEFA) Assessment applies the PEFA framework
 and methodology to provide a snapshot of the current status
 of the federal government's public financial management
 (PFM) system. The report makes no recommendations on policy
 matters it is specifically concerned with the status of the
 PFM system and issues relating to financial management
 processes. It does suggest weaknesses and strengths as well
 as possible priority areas to take advantage of strengths or
 to address higher-risk weaknesses. It makes no
 recommendations, however, on specific measures or action
 plans. The report provides a basis for these matters to be
 taken up subsequently, but, consistently with the PEFA
 framework, they should be subject to a separate discussion
 during the formulation of a government-led PFM reform
 agenda. The structure of the PFM performance report is as
 follows: chapter two gives background information and the
 country economic, fiscal, and institutional context. Chapter
 three provides details on each performance indicator (PI)
 score. Chapter four summarizes the government's ongoing
 PFM reform programs. Annex one gives a summary of the PEFA
 assessment; annex two provides sources of information,
 including a list of documents reviewed and officials
 consulted; and annex three shows key organizational elements
 of Pakistan's PFM structure.Date
2010-06-01Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Country Financial Accountability AssessmentIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2862http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2862
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Indonesia : Repeat Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Report and Performance IndicatorsWorld Bank (World Bank, Jakarta, 2012-12)This public expenditure and financial
 accountability (PEFA) assessment for Indonesia was
 undertaken by a team of World Bank staff and development
 partners with close involvement of counterparts from the
 Government of Indonesia, including the ministry of finance,
 state ministry of development planning (Bappenas), and some
 line ministries. The objective of the assessment is to
 update the integrated, standardized, indicator-led
 assessment of public financial management (PFM) systems,
 processes, and institutions as a whole against good
 international practices. This PEFA assessment has been
 funded by the Bank and a multi-donor trust fund, supported
 by contributions from the European Commission, the
 Governments of the Netherlands and the Swiss Confederation,
 and United States Agency for International Development
 (USAID). This report focuses mainly on the changes in the
 performance of the PFM system from 2007 to 2011. This report
 focuses largely on the major changes since 2007, and also on
 the ongoing reforms that should impact an assessment in the
 future organizations. It provides an integrated,
 standardized, and indicator-led methodology to measure and
 monitor PFM performance over time. The objective is to help
 assess the performance of PFM systems, processes, and
 institutions relative to internationally recognized good
 system characteristics. The rating methodology, covering a
 set of 31 high level performance indicators, with over 70
 dimensions, emphasizes empirical and observable facets for
 each PFM area.
-
Indonesia : Budget Reform Strategy PrioritiesAllen, R.; Kristensen, J.; Lienert, I.; Jacobs, D.; Schiavo-Campo, S.; Eckardt, S. (International Monetory Fund and the World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007-06)This report is designed to assist the
 authorities develop an overall road map for reforming budget
 preparation. A specific focus is on the steps to be taken to
 introduce a medium-term framework for the central
 government's budget and a performance-based budget.
 These reforms require important preconditions to be in
 place, and a substantial change in the culture, incentives
 and behavior of the public service, and are likely to take
 several years to complete. Successive Indonesian governments
 have embarked on various reforms in the budget and public
 financial management system. New laws for governing budget
 and planning processes were adopted during 2003-04, which
 are gradually being implemented. The national development
 planning agency (BAPPENAS) and spending ministries have
 developed strategic government and ministerial plans that
 provide a basis for elaborating the framework for
 performance measurement and evaluation. Reforms are thus
 starting from a secure base and can also take advantage of
 the improved and stable macroeconomic and fiscal conditions,
 including a low fiscal deficit and a declining government
 debt ratio.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).