Author(s)
World BankKeywords
PANCHAYATSFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
FISCAL SITUATION
MANDATES
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
PRODUCTIVITY
DECENTRALIZATION SYSTEM
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
FISCAL INFORMATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
GRANT DESIGN
SECONDARY EDUCATION
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
PROPERTY TAXES
POLITICIANS
DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
DECISION-MAKING POWER
LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
HEALTH SERVICES
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
LOCAL OFFICIALS
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
TAX
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYMENT
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
FISCAL PRESSURES
DEVOLUTION
GOVERNMENT PROGRAM
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
EXECUTION
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TAXATION
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
STATE FINANCE
PROVISIONS
AUTHORITY
PROPERTY TAX BASE
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
LOCAL REVENUE
DECISION-MAKING
LOCAL AUTONOMY ACCOUNTABILITY
FISCAL YEAR
NATURAL RESOURCES
REVENUE MOBILIZATION
LOCAL TAXES
EXPENDITURE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SECTOR
EMPLOYMENT GENERATION
LOCAL AUTONOMY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
EQUALIZATION
GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY
INCOME
FISCAL
LEGISLATION
DECISION MAKERS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL SYSTEM
ASSIGNMENT OF EXPENDITURES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
JUDICIARY
STATE EMPLOYEES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
DRINKING WATER CONSUMPTION
TAX RATE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
WATER SUPPLY
VOTERS
OWN SOURCE REVENUE
STATE GOVERNMENTS
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
ROADS
DISTRICTS
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CAPACITY
LOCAL FINANCE
EXTERNALITIES
FISCAL ~~~~~ DECENTRALIZATION
TAX ADMINISTRATION
LOCAL LEVEL
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTONOMY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
LOCAL BODIES
PRIMARY EDUCATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
VOTING
MUNICIPALITIES
CONSTITUTION
TAX LAWS
PUBLIC SERVICES
RURAL COMMUNITIES
POLICY MAKING PROCESSES
URBAN GOVERNMENTS
FISCAL PROBLEMS
BUDGETARY AUTONOMY
STATE GOVERNMENT
CITIES
BUDGET ADMINISTRATION
TAX SYSTEM
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
USER CHARGES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14674Abstract
The objective of this study is to review
 panchayat finances, identify issues and make recommendations
 to improve the fiscal decentralization system. Using
 Kamataka and Kerala as case studies, this report describes
 the context for rural decentralization in India, summarizes
 the current fiscal situation of district, block and village
 panchayats, identifies the main problems arising from the
 current practice, and outlines a set of reform options that
 might better satisfy the objectives of the central and state
 governments. Kamataka and Kerala were examined because these
 two states are generally thought to be more advanced than
 others in implementing rural fiscal decentralization and are
 therefore relevant for drawing lessons for the rest of
 India. There is a hierarchical arrangement of
 center-state-local governance. The 73rd Amendment to the
 Constitution made India one of the most politically
 decentralized countries in the developing world. By the
 Constitution and in practice, local government has an urban
 and a rural stream. Rural local governments are divided into
 three levels: district (zilla), block (taluk), and village
 (gram) panchayats. The design and implementation of the
 decentralization program are a state government
 responsibility. However implementation of key aspects of the
 program is lagging. Districts and blocks have no taxing
 powers and little expenditure autonomy. Both in Karnataka
 and Kerala, they more or less function as spending agents of
 higher-level governments. Gram panchayats are closest to the
 people, have some independent taxing power, and some
 discretion in expenditure decisions. Hence they are the
 primary subjects of this study.Date
2004-01-07Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Rural StudyIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14674http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14674
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sub-National Performance Incentives in the Intergovernmental FrameworkSmoke, Paul; Lewis, Blane D. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-06)This paper provides background for the
 Government of Indonesia as it considers if and how to
 introduce more robust local government performance
 incentives into the intergovernmental fiscal framework. The
 next section briefly examines the forces that have driven
 the recent national wave of interest in improving local
 government performance. This is followed by a review of the
 relatively limited set of local government performance
 incentives currently in force in Indonesia. The fourth
 section provides a conceptual overview of how to think about
 the possible expansion of local government incentive
 programs, outlining the potential role(s) of such programs
 in general and the key issues involved in designing and
 implementing them. The fifth section tentatively considers a
 number of options for additional local government incentives
 in Indonesia that the central government may wish to
 consider pursuing. The paper concludes with an outline of
 next steps for moving forward with the possible development
 of more purposeful and meaningful performance incentives in
 Indonesia's intergovernmental fiscal framework.
-
Decentralization, Accountability and Local Services in Sierra Leone : Situation Analysis, Key Challenges and Opportunities for ReformWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-04-15)Following years of civil war that ended
 in 2002, Sierra Leone has pursued a policy of
 decentralization, devolving responsibility for many
 government functions to the Local Council level. The aims of
 this policy include achieving a more equitable and inclusive
 access to public services across the national territory, in
 part to alleviate regional inequities that contributed to
 the civil war. The implementation of the decentralization
 policy has faced many obstacles, however, including the need
 to rebuild local government institutions and capacity after
 30 years of centrally dominated governance; the limited
 devolution of financial resources; and multifaceted
 political economy hurdles. This report, first, analyzes the
 current state of decentralization in Sierra Leone; second,
 identifies the most prominent challenges to continued
 decentralization; and, third, discusses options for the way
 forward. The report draws on qualitative and quantitative
 data collected from both central and local government
 stakeholders, and takes the perspective that
 decentralization and strengthened local governance
 institutions are an effective means to localize development
 and improve the effective and equitable delivery of key
 public services. The study focuses on progress to date and
 standing challenges in four key areas of analysis: fiscal
 decentralization, human resource decentralization, ensuring
 inclusivity and accountability in local governance, and
 ensuring efficiency and responsiveness in service delivery.
-
South East Europe Municipal Finance Review : Local Government Finance in the Western BalkansWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-07-22)This report addresses the limited access
 to local governments of data and knowledge of municipal
 finance issues in South East Europe (SEE). The objective of
 the analytical work under the SEE Municipal Finance Review
 (MFR) aims to (i) contribute to improved understanding of
 local government management and finance in the SEE Region;
 and (ii) contribute to improving the quality and consistency
 of key municipal finance data for improved evidence based
 policy making. The analysis presented in this report
 comprises the first attempt to review and analyze a regional
 set of disaggregated sub-national finance data in the SEE
 Region. Main findings of the MFR are presented in this
 report. Following an introductory chapter, chapter 2
 provides an overview of the decentralization framework in
 the SEE Region, including on the administrative and
 political structure of sub-national governments, their
 population size and distribution, and the service functions
 assigned to local governments. Chapter 3 explains in more
 detail the local government finance framework. This includes
 an overview of the structure and composition of sub-national
 finances, in particular (i) revenue and expenditure
 assignments; (ii) transfers and intergovernmental fiscal
 relations; and (iii) the evolving framework and realities of
 sub-national borrowing and debt. Chapter 4 provides a
 summary of the key trends and findings from the
 cross-country, regional analysis, complemented by detailed
 analysis of the disaggregated datasets, where available.
 Finally, Chapter 5 summarizes conclusions and provides some
 recommendations for a possible way forward. In the medium to
 long term, access to municipal finance information would
 contribute to increasing transparency and accountability of
 local governments, improving revenue collection and
 expenditure performance, optimizing budget allocation
 procedures, and strengthen local authorities' role and
 position in intergovernmental fiscal considerations and
 negotiations in the SEE countries.