Analyzing the Effects of Policy
 Reforms on the Poor : An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of
 World Bank Support to Poverty and Social Impact Analyses
Author(s)
Independent Evaluation GroupKeywords
OPERATIONAL POLICYPOLICY AGENDA
POLICY CHOICE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
ACCOUNTABILITY
POLICY CHANGES
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
QUALITATIVE TECHNIQUES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
DISCRETION
SOCIAL PROTECTION
MANAGERS
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
COUNTRY CIRCUMSTANCES
ECONOMIC POLICIES
POLICY CHOICES
INITIATIVE
PUBLIC DEBATE
IMPACT OF POLICY
TECHNICAL QUALITY
BEST PRACTICE
FLEXIBILITY
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
SOCIAL IMPACTS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
CAPACITY BUILDING
POLICY REFORMS
POLICY DIALOGUE
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
COUNTRY ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES
COUNTRY ASSISTANCE STRATEGY
SECTOR WORK
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
LEARNING
POLICY DECISIONS
STAKEHOLDER
CIVIL SOCIETY
POVERTY REDUCTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
NATIONAL DEBATE
IMPACT POLICIES
PRIVATE SECTOR
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
LEGISLATION
CONFIDENCE
PUBLIC POLICY DEBATE
QUALITATIVE METHODS
SOCIAL IMPACT
LAND USE
COUNTRY POLICIES
INVESTIGATION
REFORM PROGRAM
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBSIDIARY
COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM
INCORPORATED
SOCIAL IMPACTS OF POLICY REFORMS
ACCOUNTING
POLICY DEBATE
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
COMPENSATION MEASURES
EVALUATION SYSTEM
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
INTERVENTION
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS
DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
SOCIAL ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
CAS
POVERTY EFFECTS
LAWS
PUBLIC SECTOR
SOCIAL ACCOUNTING MATRIX
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
SOCIAL ACCOUNTING MATRICES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
BENEFIT INCIDENCE
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT
CORPORATION
TRUST FUNDS
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF POLICY REFORMS
DATA COLLECTION
SOCIAL ANALYSES
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
BENEFICIARIES
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POOR PEOPLE
FOCUS GROUPS
MIXED METHODS
EX ANTE ANALYSIS
REFORM IMPLEMENTATION
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
POLICY FOR POVERTY REDUCTION
SOCIAL DIMENSIONS
POLITICAL ECONOMY RISKS
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES
SOCIAL GROUPS
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT NETWORK
EX ANTE
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
REFORM PROGRAMS
ACCESS TO EDUCATION
PRICE INCREASES
DEVELOPMENT POLICY OPERATIONS
SOCIAL IMPACTS OF POLICY
SOCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
EVALUATION SYSTEMS
SOCIAL CONCERNS
COUNTRY CAPACITY
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
COUNTRY TEAM
POLICY ACTION
REFORMULATION OF POLICY
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
POLICY CHANGE
POLITICAL RISKS
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
M&E
PUBLIC POLICY
RESIDENTIAL CONSUMERS
NGO
MARKET STRUCTURE
INCOME
EX POST
ANALYTICAL APPROACH
POLICY REFORM
COUNTRY STAKEHOLDERS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
BENEFIT INCIDENCE ANALYSIS
IMPACTS OF POLICY
ANALYSIS OF POVERTY
ANALYTICAL GAPS
LIMITED
CHOICE OF TOOLS
DATA COLLECTION EFFORTS
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF POLICY
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
POLICY DESIGN
POLICY CONTEXT
ANALYTICAL TOOLS
POVERTY ASSESSMENTS
POLICY ACTIONS
ECONOMIC AGENTS
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
COUNTRY OWNERSHIP
ANALYTICAL WORK
EQUILIBRIUM MODELS
POLICY ANALYSIS
M&E SYSTEMS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2484Abstract
The current global financial and
 economic crises are likely to put enormous pressure on
 governments to respond with immediate measures and to
 undertake far-reaching reforms in the medium term, requiring
 a substantial increase in donor support. To protect the poor
 and enhance benefits to them, key policy reforms will need
 to be underpinned by systematic analysis of their expected
 poverty and social impacts. The World Bank's experience
 to date with the Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA)
 approach provides useful lessons for addressing these
 issues. Overall, implementation of the PSIA approach has had
 considerable limitations. There have been tensions between
 the various operational objectives assigned to PSIAs. The
 tensions concern inconsistencies between informing country
 and Bank policy decisions in a timely way and building
 country analytic capacity. PSIAs have had limited ownership
 by Bank staff and managers and have often not been
 effectively integrated into country assistance programs.
 Quality assurance, monitoring, and evaluation of the overall
 effectiveness of PSIAs have been weak. To improve
 PSIAs' effectiveness, this evaluation recommends that
 the Bank take measures to ensure that staff fully
 understands what the PSIA approach is and when to use it,
 clarify the operational objectives of each PSIA, and ensure
 that the approach and timeline adopted are aligned with
 those objectives. Quality assurance mechanisms should be
 strengthened to ensure that PSIAs are designed to achieve
 the intended effects.Date
2012-03-19Type
Publications & Research :: PublicationIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2484http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2484
978-0-8213-8293-6
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) : Reviewing the Link with In-Country Policy and Planning Processes - Synthesis ReportWorld Bank (World Bank, 2009-05-01)The synthesis report concerns to go beyond a summary of the country studies to provide lessons and recommendations on how to further improve Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) effectiveness. To do so, it draws on findings from country case studies, the literature and recent internal Bank reviews (World Bank 2006, 2008) on PSIA. The synthesis is structured in three parts. Section two reviews the role of PSIA in country work drawing on internal guidance from the Bank and the wider literature. It introduces the PSIA framework and the main elements of an effective PSIA. Section two ends with a presentation of the review framework and the approach to sampling and methodology for the country studies. Section three presents the bulk of the review findings and lessons learned with a focus on lessons for embedding PSIA into country processes. Section four addresses the future of PSIA with recommendations aimed at: (i) improving the influence that PSIA has on policy and planning processes in-country, and (ii) ensuring that it is applied more routinely by partner governments and Bank programs.
-
The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution : Evaluation Techniques and ToolsPereira da Silva, Luiz A.; Bourguignon, Francois; Pereira da Silva, Luiz A.; Bourguignon, Francois (Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press, 2013-08-14)Development is about fundamental change
 in economic structures, about the movement of resources out
 of agriculture to services and industry, about migration to
 cities and international movement of labor, and about
 transformation in trade and technology. Social inclusion and
 change-change in health and life expectancy, in education
 and literacy, in population size and structure, and in
 gender relations-are at the heart of the story. The policy
 challenge is to help release and guide these forces of
 change and inclusion. But how can policymakers assess
 whether what they have done, or what they are doing, is
 right? Since the 1970s public economics has placed the
 serious analysis of growth at the center of its agenda. It
 has shown how to integrate growth and distribution - in
 simple terms, the size of the cake, and the distribution of
 the cake-rigorously into the discussion of public policy,
 both theoretically and empirically.
-
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis of Reform : Lessons and Examples from ImplementationCoudouel, Aline; Dani, Anis A.; Paternostro, Stefano (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-06-05)Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) is an approach used increasingly by governments, civil society organizations, the World Bank, and other development partners to examine the distributional impacts of policy reforms on the well-being of different stakeholders groups, particularly the poor and vulnerable. PSIA has an important role in the elaboration and implementation of poverty reduction strategies in developing countries because it promotes evidence-based policy choices and fosters debate on policy reform options. This publication presents a collection of case studies that illustrate the spectrum of sectors and policy reforms to which PSIA can be applied; it also elaborates on the broad range of analytical tools and techniques that can be used for PSIA. The case studies provide examples of the impact that PSIA can have on the design of policy reforms and draw operational lessons for PSIA implementation. The case studies deal largely with policy reforms in a single sector, such as agriculture (crop marketing boards in Malawi and Tanzania and cotton privatization in Tajikistan); energy (mining sector in Romania and oil subsidies in Ghana); utilities (power sector reform in Ghana, Rwanda, and transition economies, and water sector reform in Albania); social sectors (education reform in Mozambique and social welfare reform in Sri Lanka); taxation reform (Nicaragua); as well as macroeconomic modeling (Burkina Faso).