Infrastructure Privatization and Regulation : Promises and Perils
Author(s)
Kessides, Ioannis N.Keywords
ECONOMIC REFORMOUTPUT
INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES
DEREGULATION
PRIVATE ENTITIES
DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
RAIL TRACK
COMPETITIVE MARKET
ACCOUNTABILITY
MANDATES
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
SAFETY
PRODUCTIVITY
REGULATORY AGENCY
RETURN ON EQUITY
TAX REVENUE
REGULATORY AGENCIES
INCOMES
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
PUBLIC FINANCES
PROPERTY RIGHTS
NATURAL MONOPOLY
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS
TRANSPORT
INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES
AIRPORT
MARKET ECONOMY
DISTRIBUTIONAL EQUITY
TAX
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
RAIL USERS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION
SEWAGE
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
INFLATION TAX
PROFITABILITY
CROSS SUBSIDIES
PUBLIC
TRANSITION ECONOMY
SOCIAL WELFARE
SAFETY NETS
ELECTRICITY
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
RAIL INDUSTRY
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
RAILWAYS
FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
ADVANCED ECONOMIES
ECONOMIC REFORMS
SANITATION
VERTICAL INTEGRATION
PUBLIC DEFICITS
MONOPOLY
INCOME GROUPS
REGULATORY OVERSIGHT
PRIVATE SECTOR
GLOBAL MARKET
POWER OUTAGES
BANKRUPTCY
WHOLESALE PRICES
TRANSPORT MODES
TRANSPARENCY
LEGISLATION
RAIL
PUBLIC UTILITY
RAIL SYSTEMS
TRANSPORTATION
AUTONOMY
REGULATORS
REORGANIZATION
REFORM PROGRAM
INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIES
RAILROAD
PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
REGULATOR
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
LIBERALIZATION
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
MARGINAL COSTS
PUBLIC SERVICES
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
PENALTIES
LONG-DISTANCE
PRICE CHANGES
PUBLIC SECTOR
EXCESS DEMAND
STATE ENTERPRISES
REVENUE ADEQUACY
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
TAX SYSTEM
HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION
FREIGHT
PUBLIC UTILITIES
JURISDICTIONS
CODES OF CONDUCT
TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM
INEFFICIENCY
INCOME LEVELS
TRANSPORT COSTS
SAVINGS
RISK PREMIUMS
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
INSTITUTION BUILDING
SCANDALS
CONSUMERS
FINANCIAL CRISES
PRIVATE CAPITAL
PUBLIC GOOD
TRUE
TAX SYSTEMS
TRANSPORT NETWORK
REGULATORY SYSTEM
COLLUSION
BANKING SECTOR
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
ECONOMIC SHOCKS
STOCK MARKET COLLAPSES
PRIVATE INVESTORS
REGULATORY BODIES
PRIVATIZATION
BUDGET DEFICITS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
NET ASSETS
OPERATING EFFICIENCY
FINANCING OF INFRASTRUCTURE
INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATIZATION
REGULATORY REGIMES
CIVIL SERVICE
EMPLOYMENT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
MONOPOLIES
PORT INFRASTRUCTURE
INFRASTRUCTURE REGULATION
POST OFFICES
STOCK MARKET
PRICE INCREASES
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
TAXATION
TRANSACTION COSTS
COMPETITIVENESS
INCOME TAXES
INFRASTRUCTURE REFORM
AUDITING
PUBLIC FUNDS
TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES
PUBLIC POLICY
MARKET SHARES
MARKET SHARE
PRIVATIZATIONS
INCOME
MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES
ECONOMIC THEORY
TRAFFIC GROWTH
REGULATORY SYSTEMS
RAILROADS
PORTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FREE MARKETS
WATER SUPPLY
INFLATION
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PORT AUTHORITY
RATE OF RETURN
VALUE ADDED
LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES
RAILWAY
EXTERNALITIES
FREIGHT TRAFFIC
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMPETITIVE MARKETS
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
TRANSITION ECONOMIES
INFLATION TAXES
TELEPHONE SERVICES
ROUTE
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT
FIXED ASSETS
NATURAL MONOPOLIES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PRICE RISKS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16404Abstract
Infrastructure is crucial for generating
 growth, alleviating poverty, and increasing international
 competitiveness. For much of the twentieth century and in
 most countries, the network utilities that delivered
 infrastructure services such as electricity, natural gas,
 telecommunications, railroads, and water supply were
 vertically and horizontally integrated state monopolies. But
 this approach often resulted in extremely weak services,
 especially in developing and transition economies and
 especially for poor people. Common problems included low
 productivity, high costs, bad quality, insufficient revenue,
 and shortfalls in investment. Over the past two decades many
 countries have implemented far-reaching institutional
 reforms restructuring, privatizing, and establishing new
 approaches to regulation. This article identifies the
 challenges involved in this massive policy redirection
 within the historical, economic, and institutional context
 of developing and transition economies. It also reviews the
 outcomes of these policy changes, including their
 distributional consequences especially for poor households
 and other disadvantaged groups. Drawing on a range of
 international experiences and empirical studies, it
 recommends directions for future reforms and research to
 improve infrastructure performance.Date
2013-12-19Type
Journal ArticleIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16404http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16404
World Bank Research Observer
doi:10.1093/wbro/lki003
DOI
10.1093/wbro/lki003Copyright/License
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGOae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/wbro/lki003
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Is the Level of Financial Sector Development a Key Determinant of Private Investment in the Power Sector?Gasmi, Farid; Ba, Lika; Noumba Um, Paul (2012-03-19)This paper seeks to assess the extent to which a country's overall level of development and that of its financial sector, in particular, are factors that attract private capital into infrastructure projects. The authors investigate these effects in a 1990-2007 dataset on the power sector in 37 developing countries. The results suggest that economic growth is a key determinant of private investors' investment in infrastructure projects, and that investors tend to take countries governance quality into account in their decisions to invest. The empirical results highlight that the development of the financial sector also plays a significant role in private investors' decisions to enter infrastructure sectors. In particular, the degree of country risk and exchange rate volatility is found to be negatively related to the volume of private sector investment in power projects. Furthermore, when the banking sector and the capital market are separately treated in the analysis, the existence of a well functioning capital market is the main attracting factor. In addition, the existence of an independent energy regulatory authority significantly improves the level of private investors' implication in energy projects. When accounting for the interactions between the overall economic development and the financial sector development variables, the effects of these variables are still significant and the results also confirm the importance of an independent energy sector regulator.
-
India - Uttarakhand Economic AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-02-12)In 2010, Uttarakhand entered the second decade of its existence as a separate State. During the first decade, average individual incomes rose by eight ranks in relation to the other States in India. Although these incomes are still below the median for India, they are growing significantly faster, which is leading to rapid convergence with the richer States. Looking ahead, the State can build upon its existing growth momentum, the economic diversification that has resulted from its industrial promotion policies, its favorable location in the dynamic North Indian economy, and good natural resources and skills bases to raise standards of living. This report intends to provide inputs for development thinking that is underway during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period. It covers the subjects of growth, inclusion, sustainability, public finance and administration, responding to the Government s request for a discussion of these areas. It attempts to strike a balance between broad-brushed strategies and specific and practical recommendations, bringing to bear experience from other States and countries when needed. The overall message to policymakers is: Over the next decade, Uttarakhand should aim to become the preferred State in North India for (a) investing in the production of high value goods and in services; (b) livability; (c) greening; and (d) good government. The global community, including India s multilateral and bilateral development partners can be rich sources of knowledge about design, funds, and implementation support for the State Government s development program. Early actions to engage a wide variety of development partners is likely to help Uttarakhand effectively and efficiently traverse a challenging and unique development path.
-
Unlocking Global Opportunities : The Aid for Trade Program of the World Bank GroupWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2009)Aid for trade is a means to help developing countries, especially low-income countries, integrate into the world economy as a way to spur growth. The recent financial crisis and global recession have, if anything, made aid for trade more urgent. Trade worldwide is likely to contract in 2009. It has become a main channel through which recessionary impulses from the United States and Europe are transmitted to developing countries. But these forces will sooner or later reverse: when growth does resume, trade is likely to be a leading source of demand. Helping countries to take full advantage of the global recovery, whenever it comes, has become a priority for rekindling growth, as well as sustaining rising incomes into the future. The aid-for-trade program of the World Bank Group, as with other donors, is multifaceted. It goes beyond concessional lending commitments to low-income countries (the conventional definition used by the OECD/WTO). It also involves World Bank non-concessional trade-related lending to middle-income countries. Promoting trade-led growth in middle-income countries creates market opportunities for neighboring low-income countries, to say nothing of the benefits such opportunities entail for trade creation worldwide. Moreover, investments by the World Bank's private sector arm, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), in private sector activities can also generate trade and growth by expanding productive capacity in tradable goods. IFC private investments in the financial sector have also been instrumental in overcoming crisis induced constraints on trade finance. Finally, focusing solely on financial flows would miss the important role of policy advice and technical assistance embodied in studies and capacity-building efforts of donors.