Report on the G20 Survey in De-Risking Activities in the Remittance Market
Author(s)
World Bank GroupKeywords
FINANCIAL EXCLUSIONACCESS POINT
ACCESS TO BANKING SERVICES
REVENUES
DISABLED
INDUSTRY
SAVINGS
COMPETITIVE MARKET
RISK MITIGATION
LACK OF ACCESS
REMITTANCE SERVICES
INTERNATIONAL BANK
CENTRAL BANK
PAYMENT SERVICES
MONEY LAUNDERING
ACCESS TO BANKING
PAYMENT SYSTEM
AMOUNT OF RISK
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
INVESTMENTS
BANK ACCOUNTS
FINANCING
MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS
MARKET CONDITIONS
RETAIL BANKING
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
PRIVATE INVESTMENTS
CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
BANKING SECTOR
ACCESS TO CREDIT
REGULATORY SCRUTINY
FINANCE
INTERNATIONAL BANKS
SUPERVISORY SANCTIONS
ACCESS TO BANK ACCOUNTS
POVERTY
PEOPLE
GUARANTEE
GOVERNMENTS
PAYMENT SYSTEMS
VALUE
ACCOUNT HOLDERS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
ENTERPRISES
MONEY TRANSFER
TRANSFERS
FAMILIES
LANGUAGE BARRIERS
SHARE
MICROFINANCE
ACCESS TO BANK
PROVISION OF FINANCE
PROFITABILITY
FINANCIAL SERVICE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
INTEREST
SETTLEMENT
MICROCREDIT
ACCESS TO PAYMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT
CREDIT INSTITUTION
DEPOSIT
WIRE TRANSFERS
FINANCIAL PRODUCTS
EXCLUSION
INFRASTRUCTURE
RISK
POLICY RESPONSE
BANKERS
REVENUE
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
OUTREACH
BANKING
WELFARE
HOUSING
MONEY MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL CLEARING
SMALL ENTERPRISES
PAYMENTS
OPTION
SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES
PORTFOLIO
DISBURSEMENT
WOMEN
SOURCE OF INCOME
AUDITING
PAYMENT
GOVERNANCE
SERVICES
MARKET PARTICIPANTS
MARKET
BANKS
PUBLIC POLICY
ACCESS TO BANK ACCOUNT
RISK PROFILE
REMITTANCES
MARKET SHARE
MARKET STRUCTURE
COMMERCIAL BANKS
BANKING SERVICES
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGISLATION
NATIONAL BANKERS
TRANSPARENCY
EXCHANGE
UNION
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
MARKETS
TERRORISM
RISK PERCEPTIONS
BANKING ASSOCIATIONS
FUTURE
BANKING RELATIONSHIPS
BANK ACCOUNT ACCESS
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING
PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
CONSUMER PROTECTION
DEPOSIT TAKING INSTITUTIONS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
SUBSIDIARY
AGENTS WITHOUT ACCESS
FEES
RISK PERCEPTION
REMITTANCE
FINANCIAL SERVICES
MARKET FINANCE
FINANCIAL STABILITY
PAYMENT SERVICE
GOOD
REMITTANCE SERVICE
CORRESPONDENT BANKS
PUBLIC POLICIES
PAYMENTS INFRASTRUCTURES
LENDING
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
BANK ACCOUNT
LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE
TRANSACTIONS
PENALTIES
BANK
ACCESS TO BANKS
CASH MANAGEMENT
CREDIT
MARKET INFRASTRUCTURES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23327Abstract
In September 2014, the Group of Twenty
 (G20) Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion (GPFI)
 requested the World Bank Group to undertake a survey in the
 G20 countries on the issue of commercial banks’ actions to
 de-risk their operations, specifically in relation to
 non-bank international remittance service providers or, as
 they are alternatively referred to throughout this report,
 money transfer operators (MTOs). The objective of the survey
 was to assess the status of the de-risking phenomenon in the
 G20 countries, and to collect evidence from which
 conclusions on the main drivers and the impact for the MTO
 market could be drawn. The key findings of this survey and
 the relative recommendations on potential actions are
 provided in this report to assist the G20 governments,
 standard setting bodies, private sector entities and the
 other relevant stakeholders in the financial sector on
 future discussions on this topic. In addition to working
 with the G20 on de-risking in the remittance market, the
 World Bank Group collaborated with the Financial Stability
 Board (FSB) and the Committee on Payments and Market
 Infrastructures (CPMI) to conduct a global survey on access
 to foreign correspondent banking relationships. This survey
 is focused on banking authorities, large international
 banks, and regional/local banks. The G20 Finance Ministers
 and Central Bank Governors endorsed this work in February 2015.Date
2015-12-10Type
Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/23327http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23327
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Migrant Remittance Flows : Findings from a Global Survey of Central BanksRatha, Dilip; Mohapatra, Sanket; Irving, Jacqueline (World Bank, 2012-03-19)Drawing on the findings from responses to a survey conducted in 2008-09 from 114 central banks worldwide (of which 33 are in Africa), this paper aims to better understand how central banks and other national institutions regulate and collect data and other information on cross-border remittance flows. Findings indicate that, although the vast majority of countries, in both sending and receiving countries, collect data on remittances, and 43 percent of receiving countries estimate informal remittances, there is a need for more frequent and better coordinated data collection, both across national institutions and among different divisions within the same national institution, as well as between countries. Survey results also indicate that many new market entrants' transfer activities are unregulated. Countries must take into account new channels and technologies, such as mobile phone service providers, in monitoring remittance flows. It will be important for national regulatory authorities to work closely with mobile telecoms network operators to strike the right regulatory balance, to better understand these new channels' associated risks and fully tap their potential for fostering inexpensive, efficient remittance transfer services. The high cost of transfers was cited in the survey as the top factor inhibiting migrants from using formal channels. Many countries, particularly in Africa, have made progress in rendering exclusivity contracts illegal, which can help increase competitiveness and reduce transfer costs. Further policy reforms and initiatives are needed to address the high costs of remittances.
-
Migrant Remittance Flows : Findings
 from a Global Survey of Central BanksRatha, Dilip; Mohapatra, Sanket; Irving, Jacqueline (World Bank, 2012-03-19)Drawing on the findings from responses
 to a survey conducted in 2008-09 from 114 central banks
 worldwide (of which 33 are in Africa), this paper aims to
 better understand how central banks and other national
 institutions regulate and collect data and other information
 on cross-border remittance flows. Findings indicate that,
 although the vast majority of countries, in both sending and
 receiving countries, collect data on remittances, and 43
 percent of receiving countries estimate informal
 remittances, there is a need for more frequent and better
 coordinated data collection, both across national
 institutions and among different divisions within the same
 national institution, as well as between countries. Survey
 results also indicate that many new market entrants'
 transfer activities are unregulated. Countries must take
 into account new channels and technologies, such as mobile
 phone service providers, in monitoring remittance flows. It
 will be important for national regulatory authorities to
 work closely with mobile telecoms network operators to
 strike the right regulatory balance, to better understand
 these new channels' associated risks and fully tap
 their potential for fostering inexpensive, efficient
 remittance transfer services. The high cost of transfers was
 cited in the survey as the top factor inhibiting migrants
 from using formal channels. Many countries, particularly in
 Africa, have made progress in rendering exclusivity
 contracts illegal, which can help increase competitiveness
 and reduce transfer costs. Further policy reforms and
 initiatives are needed to address the high costs of remittances.
-
The Remittance Market in India :
 Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy OptionsAfram, Gabi G. (World Bank, 2012-03-19)In chapter one, this report maps the
 patterns and characteristics of migration flows from India;
 in chapter two, it provides a detailed discussion of
 remittance flows to India in terms of their importance,
 sources, uses, trends, costs, and links to financial access.
 In chapter three, the report describes the remittance market
 (the players, the regulatory framework, as well as the
 existing operational schemes), setting the stage for chapter
 four, which presents a diagnostic of the remittance market
 based on the General Principles for International Remittance
 Services (GPs). The diagnostic covers the legal and
 regulatory framework, payment system infrastructure, market
 transparency and level of consumer protection, market
 structure, level of competition among remittance service
 providers, as well as market governance. It analyzes the
 existing situation in India and provides detailed
 recommendations (including lessons learned from
 international best practices) that are aimed at increasing
 competition in the remittance industry, providing broader
 access to payment system infrastructure, enhancing
 transparency, and ensuring a sound and predictable legal and
 regulatory framework. Several of the actions could set a
 basis for leveraging remittances to achieve other important
 public policy goals such as broadening financial access,
 expanding financial inclusion, and both strengthening and
 deepening the financial sector. The report was prepared
 through (a) background research (data research and mining,
 literature review, collection of relevant material and
 information, and background research), (b) a field visit in
 2009 (a team of experts visited India and conducted
 interviews and focus groups with all relevant stakeholders
 and major institutions active in the remittance market), and
 (c) surveys of both the authorities and the market players.